Ok,
sorry i've just re-activate an old account for that ... :-)
-> https://github.com/Dolibarr/dolibarr/pull/11354
Éric
Le 11/06/2019 à 18:10, Laurent Destailleur (aka Eldy) a écrit :
> We never tried this but it may be a good case to test this
>
> Le lun. 20 mai 2019 à 12:40, Eric Seigne
Excuse me if I fall into this, but isnt it possible to do PR and apply
a simple patch simply with git ?
git diff should be enough to submit a patch to the ML for review and
then it is easy to apply if all is ok.
Just my 2 cents, why migrate everything to a gitlab or other portal ???
Rgds
Saxa
We never tried this but it may be a good case to test this
Le lun. 20 mai 2019 à 12:40, Eric Seigne a écrit :
> Hello all,
>
> i'm sorry but i don't want to have and use a github account :-)
>
>
> https://help.github.com/en/articles/github-terms-of-service#d-user-generated-content
>
>
>
Hello all,
i'm sorry but i don't want to have and use a github account :-)
https://help.github.com/en/articles/github-terms-of-service#d-user-generated-content
https://help.github.com/en/articles/github-terms-of-service#f-copyright-infringement-and-dmca-policy
so i will do the job on something
If you want to avoid using git, you can still edit online the files with
your modifications from your fork done on github and send the PR that
github can generate for you.
Le mar. 23 avr. 2019 à 11:06, Eric Seigne a écrit :
> Hello all,
>
> here is a patch for dolibarr 9.0.2 wich replace
Hello all,
here is a patch for dolibarr 9.0.2 wich replace "empty" by "!= '' tests
againts fournisseurs accounts because i use "0" as prefix for theses
accounts.
i don't know if it could be used in official dolibarr sources ? if yes i
can make a pull request for that.
Éric
--
Éric Seigne
