> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Richard Eckart
> Sent: 01 November 2006 23:24
> To: dom4j-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [dom4j-dev] Bringing dom4j up-to-date
> What I keep thinking about
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Edelson, Justin
> Sent: 01 November 2006 20:25
> To: dom4j-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [dom4j-dev] Bringing dom4j up-to-date
>
>
> >I would like to
Am 01.11.2006 um 21:00 schrieb Mike Skells:
>
> For example, A few thinks that I would like to see ...
I personally don't want to add any new features at the moment, but of
course I think it's great you plans. You folk know much more about
the inner workings of dom4j than I do, so I'm not goi
ility.
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>Mike Skells
>Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 3:00 PM
>To: 'Richard Eckart'
>Cc: dom4j-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: [dom4j-dev] Bringing dom4j up-to-da
Hi richard et al,
> == CVS -> Subversion ==
+1 from me
I use SVN for all our projects and this is one of the last 2 CVS project
that I work on
> == Dependencies ==
Jaxen 1.2 is nearly out I believe
>a) should we upgrade all dependencies to current versions
> to see if dom4j runs
> com
Richard Eckart wrote:
> I noticed a few things that I would like to discuss with you
> before I start any work.
Hi Richard,
here are just a few notes from my perspective as the maintainer of dom4j in
Debian. dom4j is currently not in Debian, but will be added very soon.
> == Maven and friends =
Hello folks,
I have recently posted to this list asking if dom4j is still
maintained. Unfortunately it is not actively maintained at the
moment, due to a lack of time from the main developers. This has
resulted in the facts that dom4j currently
- can't compile with Java 1.5 because of ch
