At 08:29 05/10/2001 +0100, James Strachan wrote:
>Hi Dennis
>
> > I'll update the results on my web site, at least. I'll forward separately
>a
> > couple of emails from the JDOM list discussing how XMLS could be made the
>normal
> > serialization method while still allowing people to use default
>
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Nichols" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Yes I like this idea too and it should be fairly easy to add as a
> >configurable option to dom4j's SAXReader, though hopefully this could be
a
> >SAX parser property so everyone can benefit.
> >
> >The problem is though, w
Hi Dennis
> I'll update the results on my web site, at least. I'll forward separately
a
> couple of emails from the JDOM list discussing how XMLS could be made the
normal
> serialization method while still allowing people to use default
serialization if
> they want (useful if they're associating
as I've a few cycles
> I want to make your XMLS the standard serialization mechanism for dom4j.
>
> James
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dennis Sosnoski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "dom4j-dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, October 04,
ndard serialization mechanism for dom4j.
James
- Original Message -
From: "Dennis Sosnoski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "dom4j-dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 9:45 AM
Subject: [dom4j-dev] Java document model performance
> My artic
My article on Java document model performance is available on IBM XML
developerWorks, at
http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-injava/index.html This has
the results from performance tests run at the end of July. I'll update my site
with new results in early November, so if there's a
