[dom4j-user] parsetext with xmlns

2007-04-03 Thread dennis
s like due to the xmlns attribute in the input xml. How do I deal with this type of xml input? Thanks, Dennis - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you

[dom4j-user] unsubscibe

2003-06-27 Thread dennis bekkering
Hello,   How do I unsubscibe from the list?   Dennis

RE: [dom4j-user] extending DefaultElement (igor)

2003-02-28 Thread dennis bekkering
Igor, There does'nt seem to be any , check the source org.dom4j.tree.* regards dennis Where do I find documentation about classes like DefaultElement? I did not know they are accessible from "outside" without their in

[dom4j-user] (no subject)

2003-02-26 Thread dennis bekkering
Mike, I indeed took the wrong one. Thanx dennis _ Hotmail en Messenger on the move http://www.msn.nl/communicatie/smsdiensten/hotmailsmsv2/ --- This SF.net email is

[dom4j-user] extending DefaultElement

2003-02-25 Thread dennis bekkering
system.out.print) regards dennis _ MSN Zoeken, voor duidelijke zoekresultaten! http://search.msn.nl --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http

Re: [dom4j-user] Re: [dom4j-dev] RE: Thread Safety

2002-10-22 Thread Dennis Sosnoski
esn't appear to do this, except by way of the static QNameCache instance. - Dennis Jim Brain wrote: In the case I have, we are doing: public static Element doThis() { Element e=DocumentHelper.createElement("Jim"); e.addElement("Fred"); return e; } According t

[dom4j-user] Re: [dom4j-dev] RE: Thread Safety

2002-10-22 Thread Dennis Sosnoski
ot in QNameCache - James, are you out there for comment? - Dennis Dennis Sosnoski wrote: In the simple case where multiple threads are building separate documents simultaneously you only need to change the static data structures: QNameCache and NamespaceCache that I know of. Using non-threadsafe

[dom4j-user] Re: [dom4j-dev] RE: Thread Safety

2002-10-22 Thread Dennis Sosnoski
calls with a synchronize on the document object. - Dennis David Hooker wrote: I second this (or is it third?) also. I've seen some weird exceptions coming out of DOM4J on SMP (multi-cpu) machines. While I can't definitively blame Dom4J, it would at least lessen the risk in this