Hi Terry,
On Thursday, 22 June 2017, at 13:23:35 BST, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> That's sounding as if you'd have a database server sitting on
> the network with all the slave and the master being its
> clients, sending SQL to modify tables. And if the slaves are
> writing to the tables, and the
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 13:23:35 BST Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> I'm assuming that minimising power consumption won't be an issue either
> way.
Obviously we won't want to install a heavier sub-station for the WMT, but no;
we have no known issues with power ATM :-)
> I'm guessing slave Pis will
Hi Terry
On 22/06/17 12:25, Terry Coles wrote:
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 12:17:56 BST Terry Coles wrote:
I'm not sure that I understand how this works. Taking the Remote Pi; it
reads the water level and writes the value to a variable. Fine so far, but
how can the Master Pi, then read that
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 12:17:56 BST Terry Coles wrote:
> I'm not sure that I understand how this works. Taking the Remote Pi; it
> reads the water level and writes the value to a variable. Fine so far, but
> how can the Master Pi, then read that variable? That variable is a
> location in the
Hi,
(Yet Another Wimborne Model Town Question) :-)
The system design for the WMT River System Water Sustainability Programme
(that really is its name) is progressing slowly and we have tentatively agreed
on a number of things.
The control system will be a distributed network of Raspberry Pis,
5 matches
Mail list logo
