On Tuesday, 31 March 2020 23:24:36 BST Patrick Wigmore wrote:
> Meanwhile, it looks the Rosetta@home job queue has run completely dry
> and my machine has run out of jobs to process, though over a million
> jobs are still being processed by other clients.
In the Tasks View of the Manager I have
On 31/03/2020 23:24, Patrick Wigmore wrote:
Meanwhile, it looks the Rosetta@home job queue has run completely dry
and my machine has run out of jobs to process, though over a million
jobs are still being processed by other clients.
From here:
I just read this document about Science United:
https://scienceunited.org/doc/implementation.pdf
Comparing BOINC's credit system to Science United's, it provides some
insight into another reason why credit for BOINC tasks may not appear
instantly:
> BOINC has a sophisticated credit system for
On Sunday, 29 March 2020 12:19:12 BST Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> I haven't been following closely, but ‘Credit reporting and display’ in
> https://boinc.berkeley.edu/boinc_papers/credit/text.php may be relevant
> to Terry's question.
Ralph,
Whenever I can't find the answer in Google, you pop up and
Hi Patrick,
I haven't been following closely, but ‘Credit reporting and display’ in
https://boinc.berkeley.edu/boinc_papers/credit/text.php may be relevant
to Terry's question.
--
Cheers, Ralph.
--
Next meeting: BEC, Bournemouth, Tuesday, post-lurgi 20:00
Check to whom you are replying
On Sunday, 29 March 2020 12:04:53 BST Terry Coles wrote:
> As far as I know, I don't have an account and presumably am computing as
> 'Anonymous'. I don't recall being asked to set one up.
Correction. I do have an account; I'm very forgetful these days.
--
Terry Coles
--
On Sunday, 29 March 2020 11:53:27 BST Patrick Wigmore wrote:
> As best I can tell by looking at my own figures, the "Work done for
> this project" figure shown in your screenshot corresponds to the total
> amount of credit awarded to your user account. The terms "work done"
> and "credit" seem to
On Sun, 29 Mar 2020 11:53:27 +0100, Patrick Wigmore wrote:
> it seems it requests the latest statistics *before* telling the
> server about the work it has just completed
Or, possibly, it requests the statistics after telling the server
about the work done, but the server hasn't updated the
Hi Terry
On Sun, 29 Mar 2020 10:26:46 +0100, Terry Coles wrote:
> For several days the 'Work done for this project' read 0 because the
> first Task was yet to complete. Yesterday morning I was informed
> that the work done was 1, as expected, but I definitely didn't
> expect to log in this
On Sunday, 29 March 2020 11:44:39 BST Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty wrote:
> There is a delay, so it might be you were awarded 2 days of work at once
> or something?
So the Statistics don't directly reflect how many Tasks that have been
completed, but are calculated by the server every now and then?
I can't remember, but I ran it for years on a raspberry pi.
There is a delay, so it might be you were awarded 2 days of work at once
or something?
Hamish
On 29/03/2020 11:39, Terry Coles wrote:
> On Sunday, 29 March 2020 11:33:22 BST Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty wrote:
>> Work done is more of a
On Sunday, 29 March 2020 11:33:22 BST Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty wrote:
> Work done is more of a measure of the computational difficulty of the
> tasks you completed, not the number of tasks - some tasks are
> shorter/simpler than others :)
Where does it say that? I couldn't find anything.
Even
Terry,
Work done is more of a measure of the computational difficulty of the
tasks you completed, not the number of tasks - some tasks are
shorter/simpler than others :)
Hamish
On 29/03/2020 10:26, Terry Coles wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is anyone else out there using the BOINC client? As related a few
Hi,
Is anyone else out there using the BOINC client? As related a few days ago I
had problems
with F@H (which Tim is using) so I installed BOINC from the repository and have
been
running it ever since.
As also related, I found it initially overworked my CPUs and caused serious
overheating
14 matches
Mail list logo
