Hi Victor,
> Seems like others have had the same issue ("80 minutes!?") as there is
> a "Readers' Digest Condensed" version (more just someone's selected
> highlights, actually) at [1]. Although TBH I don't know how useful the
> video snippets would be on their own if you hadn't already seen the
2009/6/10 Ralph Corderoy :
>
> I've not managed to do that, even now. Partly it's the amount of time
> required, and partly that I tend to find videos provide a low signal to
> noise and I'm stuck at their speed. The written word can be more useful
> and I've just read http://mashable.com/2009/05
Hi Terry,
> For those who haven't spotted this yet, and if you have the time, (1
> hr 20 mins actually), get over to http://wave.google.com/ and have a
> look at Google's latest product, due for launch later this year.
I've not managed to do that, even now. Partly it's the amount of time
requir
On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 17:29 +0100, Peter Merchant wrote:
> But he doesn't answer the question about who is going to pay to store
> all this stuff that we do with Wave, who owns it, and how long it has to
> be kept for legal reasons.
That depends where it's stored. Wave is a distributed system, l
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 22:24 +0100, Andrew Morgan wrote:
> Terry Coles wrote:
> > On Tuesday 02 Jun 2009, Victor Churchill wrote:
> >
> >> I did find myself wondering how well it would hold up in a less
> >> favourable network environment: whether the latency might become a
> >> problem.
> >>
Terry Coles wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 Jun 2009, Victor Churchill wrote:
>
>> I did find myself wondering how well it would hold up in a less
>> favourable network environment: whether the latency might become a
>> problem.
>>
>
> Two things here. First of all, networks are beginning to get fa
On Tuesday 02 Jun 2009, Victor Churchill wrote:
> I did find myself wondering how well it would hold up in a less
> favourable network environment: whether the latency might become a
> problem.
Two things here. First of all, networks are beginning to get faster and more
reliable, so in time I be
I can see it being used on company intranets where security and network
spped won't be an issue and features such as colaborative editing etc
will be more useful. I had some concerns about everything being sored on
another server if using it over the internet and what the security would
be like, on
Simon P Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 19:47:22 +0100, Victor Churchill
> wrote:
>> I did find myself wondering how well it would hold up in a less
>> favourable network environment: whether the latency might become a
>> problem.
>>
>
> This is something that concerned me. There is more and m
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 19:47:22 +0100, Victor Churchill
wrote:
>
> I did find myself wondering how well it would hold up in a less
> favourable network environment: whether the latency might become a
> problem.
>
This is something that concerned me. There is more and more reliance
on the network
Slightly surprised there hasn't been more noise about this. Maybe they
should have made a quicker 'highlights' video since possibly the
length might put a lot of potential viewers off.
I went from 'Wow' to 'OK, and..' to 'hmm... dunno' during the course
of the talk & demo. Yes there is some very n
On Friday 29 May 2009, Terry Coles wrote:
> The good news is that most of the code is going to be Open Sourced and the
> protocols are open too. Google have already been collaborating with two
> other organisations who have produced their own clients for this. They say
> that they gained so much
Terry Coles wrote:
> So have a look and let us know what you think of it.
>
>
Stunning - I watched it earlier - they've put a massive amount of work
and thought into it and I reckon it'll be massive once folk get their
collective, collaborative heads around it.
Sean
--
www.funkygibbins.me.uk
For those who haven't spotted this yet, and if you have the time, (1 hr 20
mins actually), get over to http://wave.google.com/ and have a look at
Google's latest product, due for launch later this year. The video is in high
definition and is well worth watching all the way through, otherwise yo
14 matches
Mail list logo
