On Tuesday, 30 June 2020 09:45:00 BST Tim Waugh wrote:
> Just spotted this: update on which existing drugs have come out on top
> so far, and an end date for the project (end of July).
Although they indicate that they have reached their conclusions, but
volunteers may continue to participate
Just spotted this: update on which existing drugs have come out on top
so far, and an end date for the project (end of July).
On 15/05/2020 10:56, Tim Waugh wrote:
> On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 10:29, Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty
> wrote:
>> I'm going to have one last go at getting GPU computing to work for
>> Folding soon, but if I can't make it work, does anyone think it's worth
>> doing CPU folding, or are the contributions so
On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 10:29, Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty
wrote:
> I'm going to have one last go at getting GPU computing to work for
> Folding soon, but if I can't make it work, does anyone think it's worth
> doing CPU folding, or are the contributions so small as to be pointless?
The CPU folding is
On Friday, 15 May 2020 10:28:36 BST Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty wrote:
> Aw that's a shame. I was just going to re-add this to my Ryzen system to
> contribute some more work.
Hamish,
Checkpointing is working; it's just ETA computation that isn't. All my Tasks
from yesterday survived shutdown and
On 15/05/2020 10:22, Terry Coles wrote:
> On Friday, 15 May 2020 08:47:08 BST Terry Coles wrote:
>> The ETA computation seems to be fixed as well. The client is now reporting
>> fractions of a percentage complete and shows no sign of freezing at any
>> point. One of yesterday's Tasks is now
On Friday, 15 May 2020 08:47:08 BST Terry Coles wrote:
> The ETA computation seems to be fixed as well. The client is now reporting
> fractions of a percentage complete and shows no sign of freezing at any
> point. One of yesterday's Tasks is now 'Ready to Report' and of the rest,
> six out of
On Thursday, 14 May 2020 10:15:31 BST Terry Coles wrote:
> 'We are doing checkpointing after each of these lines (in version 0.02 and
> in workunits like 13052020 or higher)'
I can report that this is working. I shut down last night instead of
Suspending and the Ibercivis Tasks all resumed this
On Thursday, 14 May 2020 09:59:24 BST Tim Waugh wrote:
> Thanks for the tip! I'll let these VM tasks drain until I see v0.02 tasks
> come in. Still curious about how the VM tasks actually perform in KVM.
I've been puzzling over that posting since I first read it. At the start of it
they say:
On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 07:22, Terry Coles wrote:
> However, there is a new posting on the Ibercivis Message Board that says
> they
> now have a new version of the app on the server which is supposed to fix
> the
> checkpointing problem (but not the computation issue).
>
Ah, yes:
On Wednesday, 13 May 2020 11:38:57 BST Tim Waugh wrote:
> I noticed that ibercivis released a whole load of new tasks. Still no
> checkpointing, and some of them take much longer now, 8-9 hours for me.
When the six that I've got arrived they were predicted to complete in 8-9
hours. They've all
On Wednesday, 13 May 2020 11:38:57 BST Tim Waugh wrote:
> I gave up on using hibernate ('systemctl hibernate') only because the FAH
> GPU task doesn't survive it.
I gave up on hibernate, because (K)Ubuntu doesn't support it and the
instructions to make it work have all sorts of issues.
> I
I gave up on using hibernate ('systemctl hibernate') only because the FAH
GPU task doesn't survive it.
I noticed that ibercivis released a whole load of new tasks. Still no
checkpointing, and some of them take much longer now, 8-9 hours for me.
That's a lot to lose to lack of checkpointing, so
--
Next meeting: Online, Jitsi, Tuesday, 2020-05-05 20:00
Check to whom you are replying
Meetings, mailing list, IRC, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk
New thread, don't hijack: mailto:dorset@mailman.lug.org.uk
On Tuesday, 5 May 2020 19:56:53 BST Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty wrote:
> I don't seem to have hibernate on either laptop or desktop. I manually
> enabled it before, but it never worked reliably.
>
> This is maybe one thing that Windows does better.
AFAIR it works OK on my laptop.
--
I don't seem to have hibernate on either laptop or desktop. I manually
enabled it before, but it never worked reliably.
This is maybe one thing that Windows does better.
Hamish
On 05/05/2020 18:23, Terry Coles wrote:
> On Tuesday, 5 May 2020 18:12:55 BST Tim Waugh wrote:
>> Hibernate is not
On Tuesday, 5 May 2020 18:12:55 BST Tim Waugh wrote:
> Hibernate is not only for laptops.
>
> If you hibernate (i.e. suspend-to-disk), then you can remove the power with
> impunity. When you power it back on it will resume from disk.
I couldn't agree more. Unfortunately the Kubuntu developers
On Tue, 5 May 2020 at 17:11, Terry Coles wrote:
> On Tuesday, 5 May 2020 16:56:40 BST Tim Waugh wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 May 2020 at 16:53, Terry Coles
> wrote:
> > > It still needs the mains to be on.
> >
> > For *hibernate*, i.e. suspend-to-disk?
>
> No. For Suspend. Hibernate is only available
On Tuesday, 5 May 2020 16:56:40 BST Tim Waugh wrote:
> On Tue, 5 May 2020 at 16:53, Terry Coles wrote:
> > It still needs the mains to be on.
>
> For *hibernate*, i.e. suspend-to-disk?
No. For Suspend. Hibernate is only available for laptops it seems.
It is definitely Suspend that is
On Tue, 5 May 2020 at 14:43, Terry Coles wrote:
> On Tuesday, 5 May 2020 14:28:35 BST Tim Waugh wrote:
> > Or alternatively, can suspend (or hibernate) be pressed into service?
> > Instead of shutting down at night, suspend/hibernate the machine
> overnight
> > so it can pick up where it left
On Tuesday, 5 May 2020 14:28:35 BST Tim Waugh wrote:
> Or alternatively, can suspend (or hibernate) be pressed into service?
> Instead of shutting down at night, suspend/hibernate the machine overnight
> so it can pick up where it left off when it is resumed in the morning.
It looks as if Kubuntu
On Tue, 5 May 2020 at 11:05, Terry Coles wrote:
> On Tuesday, 5 May 2020 11:02:01 BST Tim Waugh wrote:
> > Ibercivis may not have checkpointing, but what if I run it in a VM (using
> > kvm), and suspend *that* when I switch the machine off?
>
> The Client might get a bit confused with the
On Tuesday, 5 May 2020 11:02:01 BST Tim Waugh wrote:
> Ibercivis may not have checkpointing, but what if I run it in a VM (using
> kvm), and suspend *that* when I switch the machine off?
The Client might get a bit confused with the timestamps maybe. The only way
to find out is to try it I
Ibercivis may not have checkpointing, but what if I run it in a VM (using
kvm), and suspend *that* when I switch the machine off?
Tim.
*/
On Tue, 5 May 2020 at 10:47, Terry Coles wrote:
> On Tuesday, 5 May 2020 10:43:53 BST Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty wrote:
> > I'll have to abort on one machine
On Tuesday, 5 May 2020 10:43:53 BST Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty wrote:
> I'll have to abort on one machine too, it doesn't complete tasks quickly
> enough for that to work.
I've posted a comment on the Ibercivis forum, requesting that the developers
let us know (by publishing a Notice perhaps), when
On 05/05/2020 10:00, Terry Coles wrote:
> On Tuesday, 5 May 2020 09:45:15 BST Tim Waugh wrote:
>> There are several things at play I think:
>> - ibercivis has not implemented checkpointing yet, which means if you
>> switch the computer off all running tasks lose their progress(!)
> In that case,
On Tuesday, 5 May 2020 09:45:15 BST Tim Waugh wrote:
> There are several things at play I think:
> - ibercivis has not implemented checkpointing yet, which means if you
> switch the computer off all running tasks lose their progress(!)
In that case, I'd be better off sticking to Rosetta because
There are several things at play I think:
- ibercivis has not implemented checkpointing yet, which means if you
switch the computer off all running tasks lose their progress(!)
- the percentage-completion report seems to be a guess: I see it go up in
10% increments, and sometimes tasks complete
On Sunday, 3 May 2020 14:59:02 BST Terry Coles wrote:
> I just got seven Tasks. They are currently shown as 'Ready to Start',
> presumably waiting until some of the Rosetta Tasks are complete.
This project is weird!
Yesterday when the Tasks started, the estimated remaining time for each was
On Sunday, 3 May 2020 14:22:16 BST Tim Waugh wrote:
> I saw some Ibercivis tasks start today.
I just got seven Tasks. They are currently shown as 'Ready to Start',
presumably waiting until some of the Rosetta Tasks are complete.
--
Terry Coles
--
Next meeting: Online,
I saw some Ibercivis tasks start today.
Thanks for the tip about this project!
Tim.
*/
On Sat, 2 May 2020 at 16:13, Terry Coles wrote:
> On Saturday, 2 May 2020 16:07:17 BST Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty wrote:
> > Unfortunately no. I guess they're having the same problem Rosetta has
> > been
On Saturday, 2 May 2020 16:07:17 BST Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty wrote:
> Unfortunately no. I guess they're having the same problem Rosetta has
> been having (though I now get a steady stream of tasks from Rosetta).
Rosetta never stopped giving me tasks, although a few days ago, they started
only
Unfortunately no. I guess they're having the same problem Rosetta has
been having (though I now get a steady stream of tasks from Rosetta).
Hamish
On 02/05/2020 11:21, Terry Coles wrote:
> On Thursday, 30 April 2020 15:27:33 BST Terry Coles wrote:
>> Still no Ibercivis Tasks, but new Rosetta
On Thursday, 30 April 2020 15:27:33 BST Terry Coles wrote:
> Still no Ibercivis Tasks, but new Rosetta Tasks still seem to be coming in.
> The Client seems to be waiting longer before downloading new ones, so it's
> presumably waiting to see if any higher priority Tasks arrive before
> allowing
On Thursday, 30 April 2020 11:43:26 BST Terry Coles wrote:
> So I may suspend Ibercivis if no new Tasks are downloaded when the current
> batch have finished processing. I currently have six tasks Running, two
> Waiting for Memory and one not started.
Still no Ibercivis Tasks, but new Rosetta
On Thursday, 30 April 2020 11:30:11 BST Tim Waugh wrote:
> Looks interesting. Are you picking up tasks from it? I haven't seen any
> yet, just see this in the logs:
>
> 30-Apr-2020 09:42:04 [ibercivis] Project has no tasks available
Yes. This is what I get:
Thu 30 Apr 2020 10:47:50 BST |
On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 10:21, Terry Coles wrote:
> On Wednesday, 29 April 2020 09:50:22 BST Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty wrote:
> > Just happened across a new project today:
> >
> https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto=en=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.csi
> > c.es
>
On 29/04/2020 10:20, Terry Coles wrote:
> On Wednesday, 29 April 2020 09:50:22 BST Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty wrote:
>> Just happened across a new project today:
>> https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto=en=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.csi
>>
On Wednesday, 29 April 2020 09:50:22 BST Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty wrote:
> Just happened across a new project today:
> https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto=en=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.csi
> c.es%2Fes%2Factualidad-del-csic%2Fel-csic-e-ibercivis-lanzan-un-proyecto-de-
>
Just happened across a new project today:
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto=en=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.csic.es%2Fes%2Factualidad-del-csic%2Fel-csic-e-ibercivis-lanzan-un-proyecto-de-ciencia-ciudadana-que-busca-farmacos
I think some of you are volunteering CPU/GPU time as well so thought I
40 matches
Mail list logo
