Hi Stas,
>> Some of the few people still active on the list also
>> know a lot about dosemu. Including a number of things
>> which changed since the last official stable release.
> Then lets CC to the list.
> I don't know whom do you mean.
Mainly Bart and you. Solarflow is also very active
and E
23.10.2012 01:24, Eric Auer пишет:
>> I think "too humble" is exactly fine for a quick release done
>> not by a developer. Ideally, 1.6 should follow soon, but this
>> may not happen.
> Some of the few people still active on the list also
> know a lot about dosemu. Including a number of things
> wh
22.10.2012 20:11, Bart Oldeman пишет:
> my reasoning goes like this: current "git" is much better than 1.4.0
> even if there are a few minor regressions we don't know about. So if
> 1.4.0 is "stable" then what is released now should also be stable,
> so as to not confuse users, who should really no
22.10.2012 17:27, Bart Oldeman пишет:
> I allowed some mild development but that's mostly new features that
> don't break code. Of course, the non-zero base changes affected a lot
> of code but those were no-ops in the case of a zero base.
Bugs happen from any intrusive (and even non-intrusive) cha
Oh, goodness:
---
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
dosemu-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT
TO::
host sfs-lb-ml.v29.ch3.sourceforge.c
Hi,
> Yes because the rate of the development is very slow.
> If the commits are more frequent, then the chances are
> high to get a broken snapshot.
Yes, exactly, I never opened a development branch because the activity
on the main branch was very slow and mostly bug fixing.
I allowed some mild
20.10.2012 05:00, Bart Oldeman пишет:
> There's a backlog of SF issues that should be resolved (including also
I've just wiped the entire "Patches" section.
(without applying a single patch though)
So the backlog became smaller.
You can review just a couple of patches that left.
--
22.10.2012 06:41, solarflow99 пишет:
> its fine by me, if someone can create a 1.5 tag then, I can build and
> test with that.
Just proceed with HEAD for now, and if no regressions pop up,
I can create a tag.
> sure how git works, I've been taking the latest git when making an RPM
> when it was ti
Hi.
22.10.2012 02:46, Eric Auer пишет:
> it is exciting to hear that there are plans for a new release :-)
How about a new release but without any plans?
Still exciting? :)
> Maybe you would like to ask on the freedos lists for some tests?
Would be nice to get some testing of the current git.
And
