So let me get this straight. This is list is coming to an end? And this is
not the last post?
-Original Message-
From: Shannon Ahern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 July 2002 19:39
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Last! (NOT)
http://discuss.develop.com/archives/wa.exe?A2=
http://discuss.develop.com/archives/wa.exe?A2=ind0205e&L=dotnet&O=A&P=44886
:-)
Shannon
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002 13:00:09 -0500, Cesar Rodriguez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>So,
>
> What are the new lists for those of us who miss those e-mails? :-)
>
>César Rodríguez
>BORN. Leading business through
The changes were announced here:
http://discuss.develop.com/archives/wa.exe?A2=ind0205E&L=DOTNET&P=R24281
- Jim
-Original Message-
From: The DOTNET list is retired as of 7/1/02
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cesar Rodriguez
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 2:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECT
So,
What are the new lists for those of us who miss those e-mails? :-)
César Rodríguez
BORN. Leading business through technology
Microsoft Enterprise Solutions Consultant
Phone: (952) 258-6693
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Brian Graf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
Let this be the end of all the post. Thanks to everyone.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Burns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 2:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Last! (NOT)
OK...uhm...so?
> -Original Message-
> From: The DOTNET list is r
OK...uhm...so?
> -Original Message-
> From: The DOTNET list is retired as of 7/1/02
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steve Holak
> Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 2:00 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Last! (NOT)
>
>
> -- Information from the mail header
You guys are going to get kicked off this retired, nonfunctional list if
you keep up posting non-messages to the !list
Steve Holak
Senior Software Architect
Brokerage Concepts IS Dept.
610-491-4879
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mathieu Rachlin
Will the list stay alive as long as this tread doesn't die?
-Original Message-
From: The DOTNET list is retired as of 7/1/02
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Buksbaum, David
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 1:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Last! (NOT)
yes
-Orig
this is the list that never-really-ends... la la la...
-Original Message-
From: Buksbaum, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 1:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Last! (NOT)
yes
-Original Message-
From: Zane Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
yes
-Original Message-
From: Zane Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 1:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Last! (NOT)
Is this still going on?
Zane
You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or
subscribe to other D
Is this still going on?
Zane
You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
> -Original Message-
> From: Buksbaum, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 10:54 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Last! (NOT)
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Burns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 1
Thanks for the information. I think that using "Work Offline" from IE is as
you stated a hack and fairly ugly for a production system, so I still want
to pursue an alternate solution. Is there any way that I can access the
Download Cache directory consistently (i.e., is there a property that
conta
I still don't understand why you just don't use the SourceSafe client and
not worry about the studio integration. Grab a local copy thru the VSS
client to get it on a machine. Once it's on the machine, open the project in
studio and dump into ClearCase.
8)
sean
-Original Message-
From: G
I agreee.
In one Enterprise Network test system that i developed, it was supposed to
emulate 1000s of NT users doing file operations/printing, etc. Therades were
created, and LogOnUser(), ImpersonateUser() were called by each thread for
the unique user. There was no other way to emulate thousands
Hi
Some architecture related queries:
What happened to COM load balancing/middle-tier scalability concepts that
started with COM Router/Application Center? How do we achieve that
load-balancing act in .Net framework? Do we still have to use AppCenter and
ServiceComponent in .Net? And is this muc
-Original Message-
From: Mark Burns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 11:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Last! (NOT)
*Bang!*
> -Original Message-
> From: The DOTNET list is retired as of 7/1/02
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of A
If you define the event on an interface, and make all your UserControls
implement that interface, you shouldn't need to use reflection to wire
up the events at all...
> -Original Message-
> From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Keith
I tried this in the web forum to no avail, so I'll try here.
I'm trying to write a test application to test my web services. The
logical method is to add a web reference to get the proxy generated, and
then create and call the proxy. This part is trivial.
By default, .NET uses Connection Groups
EventInfo.AddEventHandler requires a delegate as its second parameter. The
syntax you require is therefore:
ei.AddEventHandler(Ctrl, new EventHandler(StatusBarEventHandler));
--
Ian Griffiths
DevelopMentor
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Balaam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> My applicatio
Well... As Chris Sells pointed out, if you actually put IE into Work
Offline mode, it works fine - this seems to trap the request to the web
server and it just runs off the cached copy.
There are actually two cached copies here. What seems to happen is that the
CLR looks at the copy in the IE c
"Thomas Tomiczek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I know of NO (!) operating system so far that is made to handle
> a high amount of threads running into hundreds.
*Fires up Task Manager. Goes to the Performance tab. Looks at the Totals
group box.*
Well my Windows XP system here seems to be run
Keith,
Try
ei.AddEventHandler(Ctrl, new EventHandler(this.StatusBarEventHandler));
That is, you have to wrap the event-handling method in a event-handler. So, the
delegate itsself is *not* the event handler.
HTH,
Stefan
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Balaam" <[EMAIL PROTECT
Thomas
I would question the statement that a hundred threads will effect
performance greatly simply because I just checked the number of threads in
use here on my development machine. While I do have a number of programs
running that I would never run on a production server, I have no problems
w
*Bang!*
> -Original Message-
> From: The DOTNET list is retired as of 7/1/02
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Alois Reisinger
> Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 6:16 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Last! (NOT)
>
>
> -- Information from the mail header
>
It is possible to download the messages archive?
Stephane
Thanks
_
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or
subscribe to other D
Look at the Convert class it has a methods to convert to and from
loads of types. Check the Convert.ToString() convert method. Not
100% it will do the trick but it should.
>
>I was trying to do a little dot net proj to list all sp's and their
>definitions:
>
>sProcName = CStr(lstSP.It
thx god, this will be closed, so no more "try" shots... like this:
SHOT :-))
-Original Message-
From: Knebels, Francis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Dienstag, 02. Juli 2002 06:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Last! (NOT)
well at least one try
-Original Message-
28 matches
Mail list logo
