Re: [DOTNET] Eventlog Viewer

2002-06-05 Thread Powell, Simon
]] On Behalf Of Sean Greer (SBI-Chico) Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Eventlog Viewer Wow! The same code that requires 1.2 seconds on my machine requires 43 seconds on your machine? Are you running an x86 emulator on a 68030? :-) I adde

Re: [DOTNET] Eventlog Viewer

2002-06-05 Thread Powell, Simon
Those results look familiar... Populating the listview is also slow. Is there away of improving it's performance. -Original Message- From: Walt Ritscher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 May 2002 20:25 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Eventlog Viewer I tested your

Re: [DOTNET] Eventlog Viewer

2002-06-05 Thread Powell, Simon
Sorry, I've go that back to front. Remote access slow. Local access fast. I need to read my email before pressing send. -Original Message- From: Wayne Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 May 2002 19:26 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Eventlog Viewer Ah, I mu

Re: [DOTNET] Eventlog Viewer

2002-05-31 Thread Walt Ritscher
ehalf Of Sean Greer (SBI-Chico) Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Eventlog Viewer Wow! The same code that requires 1.2 seconds on my machine requires 43 seconds on your machine? Are you running an x86 emulator on a 68030? :-) I added the BeginU

Re: [DOTNET] Eventlog Viewer

2002-05-31 Thread Sean Greer (SBI-Chico)
odd. I'd love to know what the discrepancy is between our machines... Seang -Original Message- From: Walt Ritscher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Eventlog Viewer The Listview control adds some overhead to th

Re: [DOTNET] Eventlog Viewer

2002-05-31 Thread Wayne Lee
Wow, that is a huge difference man Wayne Lee This email has been scanned with Norton AntiVirus 2002 -Original Message- From: dotnet discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Walt Ritscher Sent: 31 May 2002 20:25 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Eventlog Viewer I

Re: [DOTNET] Eventlog Viewer

2002-05-31 Thread Walt Ritscher
chine). After adding the calls to BegingUpdate and EndUpdate the time dropped to 3.2 seconds. Walt Ritscher -Original Message- From: dotnet discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sean Greer (SBI-Chico) Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Eve

Re: [DOTNET] Eventlog Viewer

2002-05-31 Thread Sean Greer (SBI-Chico)
I made some changes to the code that you posted and running against a remote workstation with 1100 entries it takes 1.2 seconds to populate the listview (100 Mbps, dual 1.2 GHz Athlon). If I fetch the Message property, the time goes up to ~ 5 seconds. One of the things that I notice is that you'

Re: [DOTNET] Eventlog Viewer

2002-05-31 Thread Walt Ritscher
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Powell, Simon Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 3:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Eventlog Viewer It takes 1 minutes 40 sec to read 2218 entries from a remote workstation. I need to use the Listview to keep a similar look and feel as the Windows NT event

Re: [DOTNET] Eventlog Viewer

2002-05-31 Thread Wayne Lee
Wayne Lee This email has been scanned with Norton AntiVirus 2002 -Original Message- From: dotnet discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Powell, Simon Sent: 31 May 2002 13:40 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Eventlog Viewer I'm running Windows XP. Are you read

Re: [DOTNET] Eventlog Viewer

2002-05-31 Thread Powell, Simon
I'm running Windows XP. Are you reading your local application eventlog? My times are for reading the log of a remote machine. Simon -Original Message- From: Wayne Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 May 2002 11:58 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Eventlog Viewer

Re: [DOTNET] Eventlog Viewer

2002-05-31 Thread Wayne Lee
ssion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Vincent Van Proosdij Sent: 31 May 2002 09:53 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Eventlog Viewer How many entries are there in your log? Maybe you can display only the errors. I tried your code on 1000 entries, writing only the errors to xml a

Re: [DOTNET] Eventlog Viewer

2002-05-31 Thread Powell, Simon
] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Eventlog Viewer How many entries are there in your log? Maybe you can display only the errors. I tried your code on 1000 entries, writing only the errors to xml and it performs quite nice. Thanks for the snippet. I was not aware of how easy this Was. I've incorporated it

Re: [DOTNET] Eventlog Viewer

2002-05-31 Thread Vincent Van Proosdij
acing framework. -Original Message- From: Powell, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: vrijdag 31 mei 2002 10:04 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [DOTNET] Eventlog Viewer Hi, I'm still fairly new to .NET, but I want to create an eventlog viewer using C#. Attached at the bottom is some

[DOTNET] Eventlog Viewer

2002-05-31 Thread Powell, Simon
Hi, I'm still fairly new to .NET, but I want to create an eventlog viewer using C#. Attached at the bottom is some code I've already written. My problem is that I can't match the performance of the Windows NT eventview for reading the application event log. I can read a remote machine's app log i