Re: [DOTNET] calling static constructors

2002-06-06 Thread Avinash Lakshman
Can someone explain to me the rationale behind having a static constructor ? Thanks in advance A >From: Jeroen Frijters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: The DOTNET list will be retired 7/1/02 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [DOTNET] calling s

Re: [DOTNET] calling static constructors

2002-06-05 Thread Mitch Denny
nt: Wednesday, 5 June 2002 22:37 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [DOTNET] calling static constructors Is there a way to ensure that a static constructor is called for a class without creating an instance or calling some other static function? Thanks, Dejan (www.jelovic.com) You can read messages from t

Re: [DOTNET] calling static constructors

2002-06-05 Thread Jeroen Frijters
-Original Message- > From: The DOTNET list will be retired 7/1/02 > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dejan Jelovic > Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 14:37 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [DOTNET] calling static constructors > > > Is there a way to ensure that a

[DOTNET] calling static constructors

2002-06-05 Thread Dejan Jelovic
Is there a way to ensure that a static constructor is called for a class without creating an instance or calling some other static function? Thanks, Dejan (www.jelovic.com) You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http:/