Re: [DOTNET] Super stupid version question...

2002-04-24 Thread Murphy, James
1.0.0.0" where all components of the version are specified. Jim > -Original Message- > From: Blain Timberlake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 8:30 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Super stupid version question... > > > Inter

Re: [DOTNET] Super stupid version question...

2002-04-24 Thread Blain Timberlake
- From: dotnet discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don McNamara Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 8:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Super stupid version question... Rory, I was having the same problem. I personally would consider it a bug, but I did find thi

Re: [DOTNET] Super stupid version question...

2002-04-24 Thread Don McNamara
t discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Super stupid version question... If you are using Visual Studio.NET, under the project properties dialog there is an option (in 'Configuration Properties/Advanced') called Incremental build. Hope t

Re: [DOTNET] Super stupid version question...

2002-04-24 Thread Mackay, Scott
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Super stupid version question... AssemblyInfo.vb is definitely in the project. (I assume that this will be enough to get it compiled into the exe. And the following line is the last in AssemblyInfo.vb As a test, I created a new VB.Net Windows Application

Re: [DOTNET] Super stupid version question...

2002-04-24 Thread Rory Becker
AssemblyInfo.vb is definitely in the project. (I assume that this will be enough to get it compiled into the exe. And the following line is the last in AssemblyInfo.vb As a test, I created a new VB.Net Windows Application Project. I compiled this and checked the product file and Assembly Versio

Re: [DOTNET] Super stupid version question...

2002-04-24 Thread Brad Wilson
Rory Becker wrote: > I can't get this to work. > It does not seem to affect the version number displayed under the > properties of the exe produced. > Can anyone think of a way I might have turned the incrementation off? Only two ways I know of. One is, the file with your assembly properties

Re: [DOTNET] Super stupid version question...

2002-04-24 Thread Rory Becker
tefan Finch Sent: 23 April 2002 16:40 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Super stupid version question... This takes the form of major/minor/build/revision The build number based on the number of days since Feb 2000, so this will increment daily. The revision number is the number of se

Re: [DOTNET] Super stupid version question...

2002-04-23 Thread Stefan Finch
course change this to whatever you like (1.0.356.0). HTH -Original Message- From: Blain Timberlake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 April 2002 16:33 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Super stupid version question... Hehehe Okay now the default it was set

Re: [DOTNET] Super stupid version question...

2002-04-23 Thread Blain Timberlake
ave to manually change it every time, or let it put in whatever #'s it wants. Thanks all. -Blain -Original Message- From: dotnet discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mitch Walker Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Super stu

Re: [DOTNET] Super stupid version question...

2002-04-23 Thread Blain Timberlake
As an addendum so I don't look like I complete dolt I know it is getting A versionit gets the assembly, File and Product version if you check the file properties but where is that all controlled from and how do you manually do it? =Blain -Original Message- From: dotnet discu

Re: [DOTNET] Super stupid version question...

2002-04-23 Thread Mitch Walker
t: Re: [DOTNET] Super stupid version question... -Original Message- From: Blain Timberlake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tue 4/23/2002 10:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROT

Re: [DOTNET] Super stupid version question...

2002-04-23 Thread Mitch Walker
-Original Message- From: Blain Timberlake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tue 4/23/2002 10:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: [DOTNET] Super stupid version question... Okay, now I feel like