Steve Loughran wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From: "Erick Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 14:22
>Subject: Re: Using XML/XSLT to generate WinForm reports
>
>
>
>As an aside, Ant 1.5 (due to hit beta in a week or two) now has a
>WsdlToDotnet wrapper round wsdl.ex
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:52 AM
> Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Using XML/XSLT to generate WinForm reports
>
>
> > Microsoft see xHTML + CSS + SVG as the universal display formatting
> > technology, not XML + XSL:FO. They like XSLT as a _data_
- Original Message -
From: "Erick Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 14:22
Subject: Re: Using XML/XSLT to generate WinForm reports
> The ten foot pole comment wasn't meant to reflect on the quality of FOP
> (which I have heard good things about), but more about th
t: Re: [DOTNET] Using XML/XSLT to generate WinForm reports
I always thought that SVG was mainly an alternative to flash. I can see
how
it could be used as a reporting language, but I still like the look of
XSL:FO, as it leverages the same XSLT skills that I already need. Is
there
some reason why xHTML
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Birkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:52 AM
Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Using XML/XSLT to generate WinForm reports
> Microsoft see xHTML + CSS + SVG as the universal display formatting
> technology,
s language translation goes.
Erick
- Original Message -
From: "Phill Tornroth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:36 AM
Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Using XML/XSLT to generate WinForm reports
> Ok, not with a ten foot pole.. Seriously? Ap
(the same is
true for CSS isn't it?)
I'm likely missing something here..
~Phill
-Original Message-
From: Richard Birkby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Using XML/XSLT to generate WinForm reports
Microsoft s
we've all been trying to get away
from for the past 7 years.
Richard
> -Original Message-
> From: dotnet discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Phill Tornroth
> Sent: 12 April 2002 16:36
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Using XML/X
Erick,
TOTALLY NON .NET
We've had lots of success using the browser control and customizing
print templates (Requires IE > 5.5). Not a dot net solution, but
effective. If you can get past the print template quirks and security
issues (setting margins on network printers), then all is good. We b
Ok, not with a ten foot pole.. Seriously? Apache's FOP is amazing, we've
been working with it for documentation and reporting for a over a year now.
I'm very much planning on using it in our .NET project too.
On a side note, I specifically asked Mr. Box (and maybe he can comment
further if he's r
I've been using the web browser control for formatted output and been
mostly happy with the results. I, too, wish there was a managed version.
Chris Sells
http://www.sellsbrothers.com/
> -Original Message-
> From: dotnet discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of
> Erick Thompson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Check out the java to c# converter from MS.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/downloads/jca/default.asp
(watch for word wrap)
I have used this to port some of apache's Avalon project and have been
pleased. I think you could port some of the FO stu
12 matches
Mail list logo
