David Jonas writes:
Or perhaps similar to postfix, like dovecot/deliver[pid]:
I think that one would be the best scenario.
When dovecot works - it works great, and I thank you. But it seems like
every time I setup a new server, it's a challenge getting the IMAP
logins to work reliably.
The changelog's top comment is stamped 2007-01-05, 18:48 if that helps
nail down the version (I'm using a Debian/Ubuntu package).
It is solved in rc29, this patch was necesary:
# diff -Naur src/auth/userdb-vpopmail.c.ori src/auth/userdb-vpopmail.c
--- src/auth/userdb-vpopmail.c.ori 2007-04-03 15:43:10.0 -0400
+++ src/auth/userdb-vpopmail.c 2007-04-03 15:43:16.0 -0400
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
r
On 19:52:38 2007-04-03 David Jonas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Lee wrote:
> > We do some routine logfile (syslog) gathering and analysis. I've been
> > looking at extending this to parse the syslog output of dovecot.
> > Hmmm... ...
> > For instance:
> > 1. All lines, including the "deliver
Timo,
Thanks for your time.
On 4/2/07, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 13:10 -0600, Jason Warner wrote:
> Fedora pushed out an update to Dovecot 1.0 rc 28 today. After
> upgrading, mail isn't delivered to local recipients. My log file is
> full of error messages s
In my installation "deliver" die if global sieve script turn on. Is there
anything I have missed? Thanks..
Flex 2.5.33
Dovecot 1.0.rc29
postfix 2.3.8
In maillog:
Apr 3 13:29:58 minigrass postfix/pipe[24691]: CA194121BC5: to=<[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>,
relay=dovecot, delay=0.24, delays=0.14/0.01/0/0.
David Lee wrote:
> We do some routine logfile (syslog) gathering and analysis. I've been
> looking at extending this to parse the syslog output of dovecot. Hmmm...
> ...
> For instance:
> 1. All lines, including the "deliver", to begin "dovecot:";
> 2. The "IMAP(): Disconnected" to become "im
We do some routine logfile (syslog) gathering and analysis. I've been
looking at extending this to parse the syslog output of dovecot. Hmmm...
Ignoring the leading 'date hostname' prefix, some sample lines are:
dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=, method=PLAIN, rip=dd.dd.dd.dd,
lip=dd.dd.dd.d
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 04:12 -0400, Steve Mulligan wrote:
I'm using the latest Thunderbird & Dovecot. I'm trying to setup either
pop3s or imaps. The plain versions of the protocols both work fine for
me, even with the TLS option selected in Thunderbird. But when I try
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi @ll,
i try use acl with imap with dovecot latest
but i dont get trough , is there more info online then written in the wiki ?
i have a setup like
http://wiki.dovecot.org/DovecotLDAPostfixAdminMySQL
but with this acl dont seems to work , and folders
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 12:15:38PM +0100, Hugo Monteiro wrote:
>
> I've had several setups for SPAM/Virus handling in qmail servers,
> and the best solution so far was a combination of simscan + dspam +
> clamav. All the other qmail-queue replacements i've tried, including
> qpsmtpd, where jus
Timo Sirainen writes:
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 22:31 -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote:
Based on some TCP dumps we did we noticed that Outlook was doing LIST, but
no select (except at account) creation.
Could you show me the tcpdumps?
Will report back today.
After we upgraded to r29 and had both na
Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> >> **sieve plugin tries to forward mail... and fails when chroot enabled.
>> >> Put the sendmail binary inside chroot and change sendmail_path setting.
>> >> Although I don't know if even that will work. It might want to write
>> >> directly to the mail spool instead of con
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> The other possibility is to disable chrooting with deliver.
Is it possible to disable chrooting for deliver only? What about
maildir/box paths then?
Uldis
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 15:10 +0300, Uldis Pakuls wrote:
> deliver([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Apr 03 12:03:06 Fatal:
> execv(/usr/lib/sendmail) failed: No such file or directory
..
> **sieve plugin tries to forward mail... and fails when chroot enabled.
Put the sendmail binary inside chroot and change send
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 08:17 +0300, Uldis Pakuls wrote:
>
>> setuid works, but another problem arise: when chrooted, deliver can't
>> find plugins
>> e.g "Fatal: opendir (/usr/lib/dovedot/modules/lda) failed: no such
>> file
>> or directory"
>>
>
> Fixed: http://doveco
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 11:50 +0200, Johnny Chadda wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Well, I'm not that big of an OpenSSL guru, but googling shows that with
other software it's often a certificate configuration problem.
Did you set ssl_ca_file and does the file contain a valid CA
On Monday 02 April 2007 16:37, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> So here should be:
>
> CONCAT('dict:storage=2', ceil(quota/1000), ' proxy::quotadict') AS quota
ok, this is working some way (without the "2" in the storage= ... right?) ..
but I have still some things not clear... only some users have their
Manilal K M wrote:
> On 03/04/07, Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 12:21 +0530, Manilal K M wrote:
>>
>> > > Also, I forgot one thing: It's not a plugin for dspam, it's a
>> plugin for
>> > > dovecot that links dspam to dovecot.
>> >
>> > I know :)
>>
>> :)
>>
>> It
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 11:50 +0200, Johnny Chadda wrote:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > Well, I'm not that big of an OpenSSL guru, but googling shows that with
> > other software it's often a certificate configuration problem.
> >
> > Did you set ssl_ca_file and does the file contain a valid CA and CRL
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Well, I'm not that big of an OpenSSL guru, but googling shows that with
other software it's often a certificate configuration problem.
Did you set ssl_ca_file and does the file contain a valid CA and CRL?
Yes, the certificates are Ok. It works if I explicitly select which
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 09:47 +0200, Johnny Chadda wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm setting up Dovecot with client certificates and everything is
> working fine as long as the client only has one certificate in his
> store. If he has more than one, the wrong one might be sent to the server.
>
> The root o
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 04:12 -0400, Steve Mulligan wrote:
> I'm using the latest Thunderbird & Dovecot. I'm trying to setup either
> pop3s or imaps. The plain versions of the protocols both work fine for
> me, even with the TLS option selected in Thunderbird. But when I try to
> use the ssl v
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 11:28 +0200, Samuel HAMEAU wrote:
>
> > I didn't really understand where you're forwarding the mail to. Is
> > Dovecot also running there?
> >
> >
> I was forwarding a mail comming from a user of the same domain (we
> are
> running dovecot/maildir), to another domain w
Timo Sirainen a écrit :
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 22:01 +0200, Samuel HAMEAU wrote:
I experience problems everytime i forward a mail (basically, when
forwarding an email containing an attachement)
..
Here is as attachement a diff of two maildir files : the one in the sent
folder, an
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 13:38 +0530, Manilal K M wrote:
> Basically my primary objective is to prevent spam and today i got an
> interesting link to it:
> http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/tip/0%2C289483%2Csid39_gci1235770%2C00.html
>
> and
> http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/sysadmin/2005/
Hi there,
I'm using the latest Thunderbird & Dovecot. I'm trying to setup either
pop3s or imaps. The plain versions of the protocols both work fine for
me, even with the TLS option selected in Thunderbird. But when I try to
use the ssl versions, my client does not negotiate - it just time'
On 03/04/07, Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 12:21 +0530, Manilal K M wrote:
> > Also, I forgot one thing: It's not a plugin for dspam, it's a plugin for
> > dovecot that links dspam to dovecot.
>
> I know :)
:)
It seemed you were a bit confused when you asked if
Hello,
I'm setting up Dovecot with client certificates and everything is
working fine as long as the client only has one certificate in his
store. If he has more than one, the wrong one might be sent to the server.
The root of the problem is that Dovecot does not send out a list of
valid CA
Kenneth Porter schrieb:
> --On Saturday, March 31, 2007 8:55 AM -0400 Gerard
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Personally, I like the LDA feature in Dovecot. Procmail is a memory hog
>> with a cavorted rules configuration scheme. Its use has seriously
>> declined in favor of better products now av
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> Trying to figure out how to get dovecot to startup at boot. I saw the
> Ubuntu script on the dovecot site, but that didn't work on my system (SuSe
> 10.2). Of course, copying the /usr/local/sbin/dovecot file into
> /etc/init.d doesn't work at all. Any one h
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 12:21 +0530, Manilal K M wrote:
> > Also, I forgot one thing: It's not a plugin for dspam, it's a plugin for
> > dovecot that links dspam to dovecot.
>
> I know :)
:)
It seemed you were a bit confused when you asked if it would be included
with dspam. FWIW, I'm using it wi
32 matches
Mail list logo
