Hi List,
This is my first post to this list so please be gentle :-).
First of all, kudos to the developers of dovecot!
Im trying to implement quota, and I followed the instructions in the wiki.
My problem is the quota specified per user is not being honored, only the
global quota setting.
I do
Hi Timo,
You said it was solved since 1.0.rc29 but i am using 1.0.0 . After i try to
start dovecot while dovecot is working i take below error
May 22 12:36:03 mailtest mail:err|error dovecot: imap-login: No
authentication sockets found
Maybe you can check this issue.
Thanx and best regards Timo.
Dear Timo,
How about managedsieve?
Regards,
Steve
Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 15:44 +0400, Andrey Panin wrote:
Add some const's. I think patch is self-explaining :)
Committed. I even managed to do the import right the first time. :)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Dear all,
I would like to use shared folders but I'm not quite sure whether
Dovecot supports it the way I want it:
-user A should be able to share a folder with users B, C, D
-B, C and D should have read-access to this folder
Did anyone implement shared folders like this?
Regards,
David
--
* Uldis Pakuls [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In Debian bug reports I found following post (15/04/2007):
-fstack-protector works fine with glibc 2.5, or with '-lssp' if ssp
support is /not/ included in libc. Debian 4.0 is currently broken in
this way (as of libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13), so it would be nice to
I have to face it, my users are retards:
* either they're using crap MUAs which will not display their quota to them
* or they're using POP with leave mail on server and will never
notice their quota, unless it's too late
* and once their quota is exceeded, their mails will bounce -- they'll
Hi there,
On Mon, 21 May 2007, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
I have to face it, my users are retards:
Every one have such users... :)
* either they're using crap MUAs which will not display their quota to them
* or they're using POP with leave mail on server and will never
notice their quota,
We have for many years been a UW-IMAP site, with users having their own
traditional, private, mbox-format INBOX and folders: almost (but not
quite) no complications of shared or simultaneous access. We have just
completed a transparent transition to dovecot (official 1.0.0 release).
But we have
On 5/21/07, Ralf Hildebrandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to face it, my users are retards:
Level1: You ALMOST exceeded your quota, you're at 90% now
Level2: You're very close to exceededin your quota, you're at 95% now
Level3: Would you please clean up now? You're at 99% now
I use
David Lee wrote:
We have for many years been a UW-IMAP site, with users having their own
traditional, private, mbox-format INBOX and folders: almost (but not
quite) no complications of shared or simultaneous access. We have just
completed a transparent transition to dovecot (official 1.0.0
This initial proposal for a Feature Request is the result of my desire
to implement quotas, but not have the attendant headaches that
inevitably accompany its implementation.
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
I have to face it, my users are retards:
Is there any other kind of user? ;)
snip
Thus I
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 04:22:46PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 18:49 +0200, Rachid Zarouali wrote:
hy all,
i'm trying to make an acl so a local unix user 'sie' can access exalead
mboxes.
my exalead mboxes are stored in :
/opt/exalead/mail/sie/
..
This increases communication and locking significantly. The locking alone
will likely be a choke point.
My plan would require the locking only when the mailbox is being updated
and the global lock isn't already owned by the server. If you want to
avoid different servers from constantly
Timo Sirainen spake the following on 5/22/2007 5:38 AM:
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 16:09 -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
# Protocols we want to be serving: imap imaps pop3 pop3s
# If you only want to use dovecot-auth, you can set this to none.
#protocols = imap imaps pop3 pop3s
/quote
So this is NOT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes I knew I was authenticating against pam. Didnt do an ls -l of the
/var/run/dovecot. Wouldnt a restart of dovecot fix that though?
Correct, the concept was *before* you restarted the daemon, to try and
capture as much info first. It's hard when you're under the
On 5/22/07, Charles Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Have two 'special' user-specific folders (by special, I mean like the
Drafts, Sent, Templates folders) that dovecot controls:
These are just special in terms of the client side of things. The
only special folder might be 'Trash' and
Gabriel Millerd wrote:
On 5/22/07, Charles Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Have two 'special' user-specific folders (by special, I mean
like the Drafts, Sent, Templates folders) that dovecot controls:
These are just special in terms of the client side of things.
Special, in that the
On 5/22/07, Charles Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your taking control of my email and not delivering it?
That is not what I said - it is delivered - the system admin simply
prevents the end user from seeing it unless/until they rectify their
over-quota condition.
Unlikely the user will
Your taking control of my email and not delivering it?
That is not what I said - it is delivered - the system admin simply
prevents the end user from seeing it unless/until they rectify their
over-quota condition.
Unlikely the user will see the difference in deliver and received.
Sure
20 matches
Mail list logo
