Timo Sirainen escribió:
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 15:08 +0200, Peter Eriksson wrote:
Perhaps the Dovecot master process should raise it's own limit to the
allowed maximum when it starts? (getrlimit()+setrlimit()), or be
user configurable?
I guess this could be a good idea. Added to v1.1:
I'm
Hi,
I allow only TLS/SSL connection to dovecot. The managesieve doesn't work
with TLS but it works without it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ gnutls-cli -p 2000 -s --insecure -V
milliways.cynapses.org
Resolving 'milliways.cynapses.org'...
Connecting to '213.239.217.124:2000'...
- Simple Client Mode:
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 09:07:10AM +0200, Angel Marin wrote:
Timo Sirainen escribió:
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 15:08 +0200, Peter Eriksson wrote:
Perhaps the Dovecot master process should raise it's own limit to the
allowed maximum when it starts?
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Schneider schreef:
I allow only TLS/SSL connection to dovecot. The managesieve doesn't work
with TLS but it works without it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ gnutls-cli -p 2000 -s --insecure -V
milliways.cynapses.org
Resolving 'milliways.cynapses.org'...
Connecting to
Stephan Bosch wrote:
Hi Andreas,
Hi Stephan,
Did you press Ctrl-D at this point? It is necessary to start the TLS
transcation at your end using gnutls-cli. Tests using gnutls-cli were
described earlier:
http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2007-August/024470.html
Hi Timo,
many thanks, I could restore all emails.
Regards,
Oliver
Timo Sirainen wrote:
When you delete a folder with Thunderbird it usually renames it under
Trash (e.g. box - Trash.box), so you should still be able to rescue it.
If Trash was already compacted, then Thunderbird issued a DELETE
Hi,
You may be interested in this report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254217
Regards,
--
Nicolas Mailhot
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 01:06:37AM +0200, Stephan Bosch wrote:
This patch still includes (yet another) instance of the CMU Sieve source,
as explained in one of my previous e-mails.
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 12:10:35AM +0200, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Considering the dovecot-sieve plugin, I noticed
Timo Sirainen a écrit :
You could strace imap-login process to see what it's doing while the
connection is hanging, and what changes when the handshake starts. Set
login_processes_count=1 to make it easier to figure out what imap-login
process to strace.
Thank you Timo, but how can I figure out
Hello Geert,
Geert Hendrickx schreef:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 01:06:37AM +0200, Stephan Bosch wrote:
This patch still includes (yet another) instance of the CMU Sieve source,
as explained in one of my previous e-mails.
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 12:10:35AM +0200, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Hello Andreas,
Andreas Schneider wrote:
Stephan Bosch wrote:
Did you press Ctrl-D at this point? It is necessary to start the TLS
transcation at your end using gnutls-cli. Tests using gnutls-cli were
described earlier:
http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2007-August/024470.html
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 05:43:08PM +0200, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Unless you or Timo have strong arguments to the opposite, I currently
have no plans to change the current connection of sieve to the
managesieve patch until dovecot(-sieve) 2.0.
Ok. I just thought you wanted to get rid of the
Hello,
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:05:41 +1000 Tim Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dave McGuire wrote:
On Aug 26, 2007, at 4:00 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
Several good centralized software management schemes have been
around for a very, very long time. I don't use *any* package
management
Hello,
I have a postfix server which uses procmail as its delivery agent to
deliver incoming messages to several maildirs. For several reasons,
not really relevant here, I need to process/refilter/sort again the
content of these mailboxes before delivering the messages to the
_other_ maildirs
formail
darix
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 21:21:31 PM +0200, Marcus Rueckert ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
formail
No, sorry.
I just come from a thread in the procmail mailing list whose result is
that formail is either unusable or unnecessary in cases like this:
On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 21:23 +0200, M. Fioretti wrote:
Hello,
I have a postfix server which uses procmail as its delivery agent to
deliver incoming messages to several maildirs. For several reasons,
not really relevant here, I need to process/refilter/sort again the
content of these
17 matches
Mail list logo
