Re: [Dovecot] [OT] Webmail Recommendation

* Chris Wakelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > With Dovecot's caching and indexing, things are much better, but there is > still a significant overhead on opening lots of connections, I fear, > especially for mboxes (moving to maildir would help of course). I would > consider using imapproxy (designed

Re: [Dovecot] Webmail Recommendation

On 22:19:16 2008-01-10 Thomas Løcke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter Sparkes wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I want to install webmail. I am using Dovecot with Exim4. > > > > Recommendations requested please. > > > > Thanks > > > > Peter Sparkes > > http://hastymail.sourceforge.net/ > > Hastymail is v

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot-imap, tls, gnus

On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 17:21 +0100, Richard G Riley wrote: > I have a connection to my dovecot server from gnus: > > , > | (add-to-list 'gnus-secondary-select-methods > | '(nnimap "hermes" > | (nnimap-stream starttls) > | (nnimap-address "hermes") >

Re: [Dovecot] Test Environment Question

On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 09:22 -0500, Stewart Dean wrote: > I have my master IMAP server running DC V1.0.10. The homedir and > INBOXdir are physically resident there and NFS exported (no caching) to > 3 other machines. I have installed V1.1beta13 on one of them (which > thus accesses the homedir/

Re: [Dovecot] Custom 'quota exceeded' message + Sieve script from database

On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 19:11 +0100, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote: > 1. Customized "quota exceeded" message. > > http://czajnick.sitenet.pl/dovecot/dovecot_1.0.9_quota_exceeded_message.diff > > - quick hack to let me define custom message instead of typical "Quota > exceeded", simply by using plugins

Re: [Dovecot] deliver triggering SELinux AVC denials

On Tue, 2008-01-01 at 21:36 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >From: Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Date: 2008/01/01 Tue PM 09:18:05 CST > >To: Gerry Reno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org > >Subject: Re: [Dovecot] deliver triggering SELinux AVC denials > ... > >Set dotlock_use_e

Re: [Dovecot] number of auth process

On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 08:32 +0100, Jorge Salamero Sanz wrote: > hi there, > > what are exactly the differences between > > auth_worker_max_count = 30 Auth workers are used for "blocking lookups". With v1.0 that's mainly happening with MySQL. So the main dovecot-auth handles the authentication me

Re: [Dovecot] Allow_nets

On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 12:28 +0200, Evaggelos Balaskas wrote: > I use the allow_nets password extra field [0] for my users. Is there a > way to use this functionality for ALL users, and not to edit my > passwd-file every time a new user is added ? Unfortunately not. > The alternative i am working

Re: [Dovecot] Indexes

On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 09:55 -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote: > Timo Sirainen wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 10:54 -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote: > > > >> When something "bad" happens to the indexes, my e-mail client > >> (Thunderbird) reports an "unable to succeed" error on opening a > >> mail

Re: [Dovecot] [dovecot][configure] docdir option lost

On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 17:43 +0100, Guth wrote: > Hi, > While building dovecot-1.0.10 i've a trouble with --docdir configure option. > It seems this option overload is "lost" during makefiles recurse > generation (i didn't check others overload). That's because --docdir is a somewhat new automake a

Re: [Dovecot] virtual domains/users and LDAP

On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 14:28 -0800, Anil wrote: > Here's an (excerpt) of the dovecot.conf file I am using: > > auth_bind = yes > base = ou=People,o=%d > scope = onelevel > > pass_attrs = mail=user > pass_filter = (uid=%n) > > userdb static { > args = uid=vmail gid=vmail home=/var/mail/apps/%d/%

Re: [Dovecot] %d not recognized with LDAP

On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 16:39 -0800, Anil wrote: > LDAP will return whatever the LDAP schema is defined as (for the > case), which is "uid". > > I took out the pass_attrs, but didn't appear to be working. Empty pass_attrs actually means "return all fields from LDAP". I had forgotten this, and maybe

Re: [Dovecot] Problems with AUTH=PLAIN in pop3

On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 01:39 -0500, Maykel Moya wrote: > I'm using Dovecot (1.0.10) locally to test SugarCRM. When I tried to set > up a mail account in Sugar, it complains with > > -- > SECURITY PROBLEM: insecure server advertised AUTH=PLAIN > Please check your settings and try again. It wants t

Re: [Dovecot] randomly disconnected with imap, and latest hg

On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 14:37 +0100, Daniel wrote: > On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 11:11:44 +0100 > Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > I'm using latest hg from the 1.1 branch, and noticed that since > > yesterday's updates, dovecot randomly disconnects clients when using > > imap, with these

Re: [Dovecot] [OT] Webmail Recommendation

On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 15:19 -0700, Aria Stewart wrote: > > > > OK, let's try to get a bit more on topic and go back to the original > > question of what's a good webmail client for Dovecot? > > > > We went with Prayer Webmail (written by the University of Cambridge) > > as it's killer feature w

Re: [Dovecot] Webmail Recommendation

Peter Eriksson wrote: All the suggested ones have just one big FAT problem - they are all written in that security bug ridden language that the hackers just love to exploit - PHP. Running a web application available to the whole wide internet written in PHP is just asking for someone to break

Re: [Dovecot] Is there a way to limit multiple POP3 connections?

On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 20:30 +0200, arvids wrote: > On Thursday 10 January 2008 20:08:43 Charles Marcus wrote: > > Ok, I guess we both may need to read it a few more time - not surprising > > in my case... :) > OK, done :) > > > > > It doesn't say you don't need the index files - it says you don't

Re: [Dovecot] Is there a way to limit multiple POP3 connections?

On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 11:17 +0100, Laurent PELLISSIER wrote: > Timo Sirainen a écrit : > > > I updated http://wiki.dovecot.org/POP3Server. See maildir performance > > and session locking. > > Why with mbox the performance is getting worse for users that don't > keep mails on server ? Tha

Re: [Dovecot] Imap assertion (dovecot-1.1.beta13)

On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 20:46 +, Nuno Lopes wrote: > Hi Timo, > I just discovered that this bug is showing up in the folder where I > archive this mailing list. I also noticed that this problem is happening > on folders where I was trying the zlib plugin for maildirs (introduced > in 1.1.beta5)

Re: [Dovecot] Webmail Recommendation

Tim Alberts wrote: I'll add Usermin (http://webmin.com/usermin.html) to the list, which is part of the webmin (http://webmin.com/) program. It's more than just a web based email client, but you can limit features that you don't want users to access. Out of curiosity, I Yahood 'java mbox mai

Re: [Dovecot] Webmail Recommendation

* Thomas Løcke, 2008-01-10 22:19 http://hastymail.sourceforge.net/ Hastymail is very light, fast and extremely easy to setup and maintain. I can highly recommend it. Beware of the sorting bug, though: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1263979&group_id=66202&atid=51368

Re: [Dovecot] Webmail Recommendation

I'll add Usermin (http://webmin.com/usermin.html) to the list, which is part of the webmin (http://webmin.com/) program. It's more than just a web based email client, but you can limit features that you don't want users to access.

Re: [Dovecot] Webmail Recommendation

Peter Eriksson wrote: All the suggested ones have just one big FAT problem - they are all written in that security bug ridden language that the hackers just love to exploit - PHP. Running a web application available to the whole wide internet written in PHP is just asking for someone to break i

Re: [Dovecot] Please help me resolve why mail isn't being delivered to virtual users

on 1/10/2008 1:20 PM Evaggelos Balaskas spake the following: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I don't understand why people always want something more :D Can you expand on that? ;-P -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they d

Re: [Dovecot] [OT] Webmail Recommendation

OK, let's try to get a bit more on topic and go back to the original question of what's a good webmail client for Dovecot? We went with Prayer Webmail (written by the University of Cambridge) as it's killer feature was *persistent* IMAP connections. Persistence is a total win for webmai

Re: [Dovecot] Webmail Recommendation

I want to install webmail. I am using Dovecot with Exim4. Recommendations requested please. Squirrel Mail is very fast and has a lot of plug-ins. http://www.squirrelmail.org/ there is also a forked version of squirrelmail called overlook that is worth checking out: http://www.openit.it/in

Re: [Dovecot] Please help me resolve why mail isn't being delivered to virtual users

On 1/10/2008, Brian T Glenn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Is it really that foreign of a concept to encounter a term you are not familiar with, copy it into your clipboard, and paste it into Google? I thought that was half of being successful at IT? I love the ContextSearch extension (used to wor

Re: [Dovecot] [OT] Webmail Recommendation

Robert Tomanek wrote: Hello Peter, Thursday, January 10, 2008, 8:17:15 PM, you wrote: All the suggested ones have just one big FAT problem - they are all written in that security bug ridden language that the hackers just love to exploit - PHP. Running a web application available to the whole

Re: [Dovecot] Webmail Recommendation

Peter Sparkes wrote: > Hi, > > I want to install webmail. I am using Dovecot with Exim4. > > Recommendations requested please. Currently the best webmailer is Horde http://www.horde.org/ It has several components you could put together to get sieve scripting support, calendar etc. It is the

Re: [Dovecot] Please help me resolve why mail isn't being delivered to virtual users

Andrew Falanga wrote: > > [snip] > > If it's expected that the reader knows what the difference between mbox and > MAILDIR is, then a "disclaimer" or sorts should be given at least in the > opening page of the wiki. Something like, "It's assumed that the reader has > more than a basic understand

Re: [Dovecot] [debian] Etch Packages Available for v1.0.10

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 01:44:35PM +0100, Frank Kintrup may have written: > > Has anyone already made debian packages for one of the > 1.1.x releases of Dovecot? I would recommend grabbing my source package, grabbing the tarball of

Re: [Dovecot] Please help me resolve why mail isn't being delivered to virtual users

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I dont understand why people always want something more :D Charles Marcus wrote: | So go for it! You have a brain. You have a library somehwere close by. | You have bookstores. You have fingers. You have a computer. You have an | internet connection.

Re: [Dovecot] Webmail Recommendation

Peter Sparkes wrote: Hi, I want to install webmail. I am using Dovecot with Exim4. Recommendations requested please. Thanks Peter Sparkes http://hastymail.sourceforge.net/ Hastymail is very light, fast and extremely easy to setup and maintain. I can highly recommend it. Regards, Thomas

Re: [Dovecot] Please help me resolve why mail isn't being delivered to virtual users

On 1/10/2008, Andrew Falanga ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: What I wasn't clear on was how the mail actually ended up into a persons "INBOX." This process was unknown to me. It was educational to me that it was sendmail that handles this. Actually, it is the DELIVERY AGENT that is responsible for

Re: [Dovecot] Imap assertion (dovecot-1.1.beta13)

Hi Timo, I just discovered that this bug is showing up in the folder where I archive this mailing list. I also noticed that this problem is happening on folders where I was trying the zlib plugin for maildirs (introduced in 1.1.beta5). Since this folder hasn't got any confidential mail I can make

Re: [Dovecot] Please help me resolve why mail isn't being delivered to virtual users

on 1/10/2008 10:37 AM Brian T Glenn spake the following: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:26:05AM -0700, Andrew Falanga may have written: In an ideal world, perhaps, no one would setup a mail server unless they knew how to. The trouble is, this position

Re: [Dovecot] [OT] Webmail Recommendation

Hello Peter, Thursday, January 10, 2008, 8:17:15 PM, you wrote: > All the suggested ones have just one big FAT problem - they are all > written in that security bug ridden language that the hackers just love > to exploit - PHP. Running a web application available to the whole wide > internet writt

Re: [Dovecot] Webmail Recommendation

On Do 10 Jan 2008 08:17:15p Peter Eriksson wrote: > All the suggested ones have just one big FAT problem - they are > all written in that security bug ridden language that the hackers > just love to exploit - PHP. Hi, you could try NeoMail, written in Perl. http://sourceforge.net/projects/neoma

Re: [Dovecot] Webmail Recommendation

zbigniew szalbot skrev: Hi Peter, Peter Sparkes pisze: Hi, I want to install webmail. I am using Dovecot with Exim4. Recommendations requested please. Squirrel Mail is very fast and has a lot of plug-ins. http://www.squirrelmail.org/ RoundCube looks very nice and has drag and drop featu

Re: [Dovecot] Is there a way to limit multiple POP3 connections?

on 1/10/2008 8:37 AM Charles Marcus spake the following: On 1/10/2008, arvids ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I updated http://wiki.dovecot.org/POP3Server. See maildir performance and session locking. so according to this for POP3-only setups and v1.1 it is better to disable index files completely

Re: [Dovecot] Webmail Recommendation

Hello Peter, Wednesday, January 10, 2007, 6:41:46 PM, you wrote: > I want to install webmail. I am using Dovecot with Exim4. > Recommendations requested please. I can confirm RoundCube ( http://www.roundcube.net/ ) is a good recommendation. Don't get discouraged by the early beta version numb

Re: [Dovecot] Webmail Recommendation

On Jan 10, 2007 1:41 PM, Peter Sparkes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I want to install webmail. I am using Dovecot with Exim4. > > Recommendations requested please. > > Thanks > > Peter Sparkes > Try nasmail: http://www.nasmail.org/ instead of squirrelmail. It has many working plugins and

Re: [Dovecot] Please help me resolve why mail isn't being delivered to virtual users

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:26:05AM -0700, Andrew Falanga may have written: > > In an ideal world, perhaps, no one would setup a mail server unless they > knew how to. The trouble is, this position doesn't take into account that > we *DON'T* live in a

Re: [Dovecot] Is there a way to limit multiple POP3 connections?

On Thursday 10 January 2008 20:08:43 Charles Marcus wrote: > Ok, I guess we both may need to read it a few more time - not surprising > in my case... :) OK, done :) > > It doesn't say you don't need the index files - it says you don't need > the dovecot.index.CACHE file... > > According to this th

Re: [Dovecot] Is there a way to limit multiple POP3 connections?

On 1/10/2008, arvids ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: So maybe you also should read it again :) Ok... ... done. ;) I mean 'Maildir Performance' section, not 'mbox Performance' - according to it all that POP3 needs is in dovecot-uidlist file(with v.1.1), so I assume that index files are not needed

Re: [Dovecot] Webmail Recommendation

Peter Sparkes wrote: Hi, I want to install webmail. I am using Dovecot with Exim4. Recommendations requested please. RoundCube is nice, but development is slow http://roundcube.net/ @mail is very good, has optional user management module also. @mail is commercial but then again it is the

Re: [Dovecot] do not lose mail when dovecot is dead

On Thursday 10 January 2008 05:24:01 Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 21:50 +0100, Daniel wrote: > > Recently I've experienced problems with dovecot. Dovecot died > > silently, what means is that there are no core files, nor any > > indication in the log files, just the "kevent(): Inval

Re: [Dovecot] Webmail Recommendation

Hi Peter, Peter Sparkes pisze: Hi, I want to install webmail. I am using Dovecot with Exim4. Recommendations requested please. Squirrel Mail is very fast and has a lot of plug-ins. http://www.squirrelmail.org/ RoundCube looks very nice and has drag and drop feature but it is a tad slowe

Re: [Dovecot] Webmail Recommendation

Peter Sparkes wrote: > Hi, > > I want to install webmail. I am using Dovecot with Exim4. > > Recommendations requested please. Not perfect, but great: . /L

[Dovecot] Webmail Recommendation

Hi, I want to install webmail. I am using Dovecot with Exim4. Recommendations requested please. Thanks Peter Sparkes

Re: [Dovecot] Please help me resolve why mail isn't being delivered to virtual users

On Jan 10, 2008 9:03 AM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 1/9/2008 3:02 PM Andrew Falanga spake the following: > > On Jan 9, 2008 3:24 PM, Pascal Volk < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > >> Am 09.01.2008 22:51 schrieb Asheesh Laroia: > >>> As they say, I have been schooled. (-: > >>

Re: [Dovecot] Please help me resolve why mail isn't being delivered to virtual users

On Jan 10, 2008 5:28 AM, Charles Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Falanga, on 1/9/2008 6:02 PM, said the following: > >> What should I say? The Dovecot wiki is very > >> informative. :-) > > > Very informative yes, but at the same time it seems to make the same

Re: [Dovecot] Is there a way to limit multiple POP3 connections?

On Thursday 10 January 2008 18:37:51 Charles Marcus wrote: > On 1/10/2008, arvids ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >> I updated http://wiki.dovecot.org/POP3Server. See maildir > >> performance and session locking. > > > > so according to this for POP3-only setups and v1.1 it is better to > > disable in

Re: [Dovecot] Is there a way to limit multiple POP3 connections?

On 1/10/2008, arvids ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I updated http://wiki.dovecot.org/POP3Server. See maildir performance and session locking. so according to this for POP3-only setups and v1.1 it is better to disable index files completely? Are there any drawbacks of disabling index files for PO

Re: [Dovecot] Is there a way to limit multiple POP3 connections?

On Thursday 10 January 2008 05:59:27 Timo Sirainen wrote: > I updated http://wiki.dovecot.org/POP3Server. See maildir performance > and session locking. so according to this for POP3-only setups and v1.1 it is better to disable index files completely? Are there any drawbacks of disabling index fi

[Dovecot] Dovecot-imap, tls, gnus

I have a connection to my dovecot server from gnus: , | (add-to-list 'gnus-secondary-select-methods |'(nnimap "hermes" | (nnimap-stream starttls) | (nnimap-address "hermes") | (nnimap-authinfo-file "~/.authinfo"))) `

Re: [Dovecot] Please help me resolve why mail isn't being delivered to virtual users

on 1/9/2008 3:02 PM Andrew Falanga spake the following: On Jan 9, 2008 3:24 PM, Pascal Volk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Am 09.01.2008 22:51 schrieb Asheesh Laroia: As they say, I have been schooled. (-: My apologies - I wasn't aware of these "virtual user with a UID" setups. I was only aware o

Re: [Dovecot] Too many open files

We were running 1.015r (since that is what Redhat distributes) and had the "Too many open files" problem. We were using PAM at first and then userdb ldap. We upgraded to 1.10 and all seems to be fixed for us now. I have no idea about the in between versions. Upgrading to 1.10 seems to

Re: [Dovecot] Please help me resolve why mail isn't being delivered to virtual users

On Jan 10, 2008 4:55 AM, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Falanga wrote: > > > > You have no idea how much I appreciate this posting. I installed > procmail > > last night, but couldn't find any reliable information on how to > integrate > > it into my sendmail system. This is most help

Re: [Dovecot] quota_wrning not working for me (quota_rewrite patch for dovecot 1.0.8) and dovecot 1.1.beta13

Hello Timo, have you had the time to take a look at this code for the quota-warning to run. In the quota-rewrite patch and in the 1.1beta13 code the warning command is executed with this condition if ((bytes_current < warnings[i].bytes_limit && bytes_current >= w

Re: [Dovecot] Switch from courier to dovecot

Out of curiosity how did you handle the courierimapsubscribed and courierimapuiddb file name differences? Did you just rename them? Cheers, Jan -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Richard G Riley Verzonden: donderdag 10 januari 2008 13:30 Aan:

Re: [Dovecot] Deliver core dump in b13 (hg 20080102)

On Thu, January 10, 2008 1:25 pm, Timo Sirainen wrote: Hi Timo, thanks for looking into this. > On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 23:05 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Yes, because unfortunately that's the only way to flush NFS file handle > cache. Although if it gives this error, it probably doesn't even

Re: [Dovecot] Too many open files

Timo Sirainen wrote: The problem with "Too many open files" has disappeared here when using the version dovecot.i386 1:1.0.9-0_65.fc7 on a system running Fedora 7. With the more recent version dovecot.i386 1:1.0.10-0_66.fc7, the problem occurs again as it did previously. There's hardly any di

Re: [Dovecot] Switch from courier to dovecot

On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 13:29 +0100, Richard G Riley wrote: > I have an courier IMAP server running. To get sib dirs working I had to > rename them all to begin with a period ".". > > e.g > > Maildir > Maildir/{cur,new,tmp} > Maildir/.account1/{cur,new,tmp} > Maildir/.account2/{cur,new,tmp} > Maild

Re: [Dovecot] Deliver core dump in b13 (hg 20080102)

On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 14:25 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 23:05 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The “nfs_flush_file_handle_cache_dir” error makes me wonder - seems like > > it tries to delete the homedir of the accounts maildir storage. > > Yes, because unfortunately that

[Dovecot] Switch from courier to dovecot

I have an courier IMAP server running. To get sib dirs working I had to rename them all to begin with a period ".". e.g Maildir Maildir/{cur,new,tmp} Maildir/.account1/{cur,new,tmp} Maildir/.account2/{cur,new,tmp} Maildir/.account3/{cur,new,tmp} etc If I uninstall Courier and install dovecot,

Re: [Dovecot] Please help me resolve why mail isn't being delivered to virtual users

Andrew Falanga, on 1/9/2008 6:02 PM, said the following: What should I say? The Dovecot wiki is very informative. :-) Very informative yes, but at the same time it seems to make the same mistake all people make when writing documentation. There are many assumptions

Re: [Dovecot] Deliver core dump in b13 (hg 20080102)

On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 23:05 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The “nfs_flush_file_handle_cache_dir” error makes me wonder - seems like > it tries to delete the homedir of the accounts maildir storage. Yes, because unfortunately that's the only way to flush NFS file handle cache. Although if it giv

Re: [Dovecot] Deliver core dump in b13 (hg 20080102)

Just tested hg 20080110 with the same result. - Mikkel

Re: [Dovecot] Please help me resolve why mail isn't being delivered to virtual users

Andrew Falanga wrote: You have no idea how much I appreciate this posting. I installed procmail last night, but couldn't find any reliable information on how to integrate it into my sendmail system. This is most helpful. Just out of curiosity, would you know how difficult it would be to confi

Re: [Dovecot] Please help me resolve why mail isn't being delivered to virtual users

Timo Sirainen wrote: On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 09:32 +0100, mouss wrote: Pascal Volk wrote: Am 09.01.2008 21:43 schrieb Asheesh Laroia: Not in the way I was describing: Let's say some person logs on to your Dovecot-based IMAP service and figures out how to take over Dovecot to read and modify ar

Re: [Dovecot] Is there a way to limit multiple POP3 connections?

Timo Sirainen a écrit : I updated http://wiki.dovecot.org/POP3Server. See maildir performance and session locking. Why with mbox the performance is getting worse for users that don't keep mails on server ? Is it because dovecot does not delete the index entry when it delete a mail ? So inde

Re: [Dovecot] Too many open files

On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 07:41 +0100, Claude Frantz wrote: > Hello ! > > The problem with "Too many open files" has disappeared here when using > the version dovecot.i386 1:1.0.9-0_65.fc7 on a system running Fedora 7. > With the more recent version dovecot.i386 1:1.0.10-0_66.fc7, the problem > occu

Re: [Dovecot] Too many open files

Hello ! The problem with "Too many open files" has disappeared here when using the version dovecot.i386 1:1.0.9-0_65.fc7 on a system running Fedora 7. With the more recent version dovecot.i386 1:1.0.10-0_66.fc7, the problem occurs again as it did previously. Thanks a lot ! Claude

Re: [Dovecot] Please help me resolve why mail isn't being delivered to virtual users

On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 09:32 +0100, mouss wrote: > Pascal Volk wrote: > > Am 09.01.2008 21:43 schrieb Asheesh Laroia: > >> Not in the way I was describing: > >> > >> Let's say some person logs on to your Dovecot-based IMAP service and > >> figures out how to take over Dovecot to read and modify arb

Re: [Dovecot] Please help me resolve why mail isn't being delivered to virtual users

Pascal Volk wrote: > Am 09.01.2008 21:43 schrieb Asheesh Laroia: >> Not in the way I was describing: >> >> Let's say some person logs on to your Dovecot-based IMAP service and >> figures out how to take over Dovecot to read and modify arbitrary files on >> the system. (Timo, I hope this doesn't

Re: [Dovecot] Per user mailbox quota

I have read the links and where can I mention these extra fields (in /etc/passwd file??). Thanks BAT Message: 2 Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:47:05 +0100 From: Luuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Per user mailbox quota To: Dovecot Mailing List Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type