Karl Schmidt wrote:
I just moved to dovecot with Maildir. I think this is probably a
stupid question, but I couldn't find an answer after an hour of
googling and searching the wiki.
What would happen if I ran a script that did this:
mv ~/Maildir/.folder_one/cur/* ~/Maildir/.folder_two/cur/
Le Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:10:29 +0300
Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrit:
On Apr 18, 2008, at 5:46 PM, Laurent Papier wrote:
Hi,
I have tested dovecot 1.1.rc4. I seems to works fine with my
configuration.
I have also tested the downgrade from 1.1rc4 to 1.0.10. It seems to
work
I've managed to get it working with the following patch.
There may be a better way, deeper in the code, to do it. Timo or
Johannes ... any sugestions?
--- dovecot-antispam/mailtrain.c2008-04-19 22:20:32.0 +0100
+++ dovecot-antispam-qmail/mailtrain.c 2008-04-19
ML wrote:
I'm not a developper so I can't do it by myself, but I wonder if it
could be possible to use tagSpam and tagNospam DSPAM feature to ehance
user's dspam lerning experience. I even don't know if this must be
done by DSPAM itself or by dovecot, but let me explain :
The feature would
I'm not a developper so I can't do it by myself, but I wonder if it
could be possible to use tagSpam and tagNospam DSPAM feature to ehance
user's dspam lerning experience. I even don't know if this must be
done by DSPAM itself or by dovecot, but let me explain :
The feature would be done
Surely spam filtering/rejection should be done by the MTA, preferably during the
SMTP protocol conversation so as to prevent the black-holing of legitimate
e-mails (i.e. the sender doesn't know it's not been delivered) and the
prevention of joe-job collateral spamming?
It should also be noted
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 12:18 +0200, ML wrote:
I'm not a developper so I can't do it by myself,
# msgtag.spam
If this message was classified SPAM by mistake, please click here :
http://example.com/dspam-retrain.cgi?sig=
{DSPAM_SIG}
# msgtag.nonspam
If this message should have been
Le 21 avr. 08 à 13:58, Johannes Berg a écrit :
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 12:18 +0200, ML wrote:
I'm not a developper so I can't do it by myself,
# msgtag.spam
If this message was classified SPAM by mistake, please click here :
http://example.com/dspam-retrain.cgi?sig=
{DSPAM_SIG}
#
Hi,
I'm using postfix with Dovecot 1.0.5 and getting the following errors
when a user moves a massive folders contents to trash (65000 or so
messages):
Apr 21 15:31:01 mink dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Timeout while
waiting for lock for transaction log file
Le 21 avr. 08 à 12:49, Hugo Monteiro a écrit :
Never the less, it would be a nice idea, but i think you're
forgetting the technicalities. I assume that such http submission
would be authenticated. Do you want to nag your users constantly
with authentication popups, and windows opening,
ML wrote:
Le 21 avr. 08 à 12:49, Hugo Monteiro a écrit :
Never the less, it would be a nice idea, but i think you're
forgetting the technicalities. I assume that such http submission
would be authenticated. Do you want to nag your users constantly with
authentication popups, and windows
mouss wrote:
karl wrote:
What would happen if I ran a script that did this:
mv ~/Maildir/.folder_one/cur/* ~/Maildir/.folder_two/cur/
My hunch is it might break things.
shouldn't break anything. if the MUA is caching actions (happens with
thunderbird at least), then the view in the client
On 4/21/2008 1:15 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
So - how hard would it be to make dovecot simply accept the last
defined setting read, instead of refusing to start?
That seems like a major change in function. To some admins it would be
like suddenly having to drive your car from the other side.
on 4-18-2008 3:43 AM Charles Marcus spake the following:
Hey Timo,
I was wondering how much trouble it would be to again emulate the way
postfix does something - in this case, the way it reads its config file
when starting up.
Current behavior:
Postfix:
If postfix encounters the same
Karl Schmidt wrote:
mouss wrote:
karl wrote:
What would happen if I ran a script that did this:
mv ~/Maildir/.folder_one/cur/* ~/Maildir/.folder_two/cur/
My hunch is it might break things.
shouldn't break anything. if the MUA is caching actions (happens
with thunderbird at least), then the
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, mouss wrote:
Karl Schmidt wrote:
mouss wrote:
karl wrote:
What would happen if I ran a script that did this:
mv ~/Maildir/.folder_one/cur/* ~/Maildir/.folder_two/cur/
My hunch is it might break things.
shouldn't break anything. if the MUA is caching actions (happens
Asheesh Laroia wrote:
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, mouss wrote:
Karl Schmidt wrote:
mouss wrote:
karl wrote:
What would happen if I ran a script that did this:
mv ~/Maildir/.folder_one/cur/* ~/Maildir/.folder_two/cur/
My hunch is it might break things.
shouldn't break anything. if the MUA is
ML wrote:
Le 21 avr. 08 à 13:58, Johannes Berg a écrit :
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 12:18 +0200, ML wrote:
I'm not a developper so I can't do it by myself,
# msgtag.spam
If this message was classified SPAM by mistake, please click here :
http://example.com/dspam-retrain.cgi?sig=
{DSPAM_SIG}
#
hey,
in my dspam database there has been some odd behaviour:
during training dspam had created an uid entry named by the local part
of the email. i.e.:
user1
I use a virtual setup using dovecot, postfix and postfixadmin. On my
first try I set up a database for dspam itself and there this
mouss wrote:
Karl Schmidt wrote:
mouss wrote:
karl wrote:
What would happen if I ran a script that did this:
mv ~/Maildir/.folder_one/cur/* ~/Maildir/.folder_two/cur/
My hunch is it might break things.
shouldn't break anything. if the MUA is caching actions (happens
with thunderbird at
The correct way has to be one or the other:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Exim
are mutually exclusive with
http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/DebianStable
It appears that exim can either call dovecot's LDA or make the delivery itself. There may
be good reasons to do it one way or the other.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am trying to implement public folders on my Fedora 8 + Postfix 2.5.1 +
MySQL + Dovecot 1.0.13. I have Public folder shown in for my users but
when they choose the folder Public they receive the error The mail
server responded: Mailbox doesn't
I have Dovecot 1.0.9 running right now and I'm looking to upgrade but at
the same time re-compile with SSL support. Dovecot's been working great
for me so far. When I try to compile I keep getting this at the end:
Building with SSL support ... : no
Building with IPv6 support ..
23 matches
Mail list logo