Hi All,
I tried to build dovecot-1.1.rc9 on a HP-UX machine, but failed to configure
with the following message:
configure: error: You don't appear to have C99 compatible vsnprintf() call
The environment is like the following:
- command: ./configure
- uname: HP-UX B.11.23 U ia64
- aCC
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 23:37 -0700, Woonsan Ko wrote:
Hi All,
I tried to build dovecot-1.1.rc9 on a HP-UX machine, but failed to configure
with the following message:
configure: error: You don't appear to have C99 compatible vsnprintf() call
You're in luck, I just yesterday fixed a lot of
Hi Timo,
Thank you very much for quick response.
I have just tested with your new package, but they print other errors during
`make':
1. `make' after `configure'
Error 239: str-find.c, line 17 # A struct/union shall not contain a member
with incomplete type.
int goodtab[];
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 00:12 -0700, Woonsan Ko wrote:
Hi Timo,
Thank you very much for quick response.
I have just tested with your new package, but they print other errors during
`make':
1. `make' after `configure'
Error 239: str-find.c, line 17 # A struct/union shall not contain a
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 09:40 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 23:37 -0700, Woonsan Ko wrote:
Hi All,
I tried to build dovecot-1.1.rc9 on a HP-UX machine, but failed to
configure with the following message:
configure: error: You don't appear to have C99 compatible
Hi Timo,
Please see comments below.
--- On Fri, 6/13/08, Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] configure error on HP-UX: C99 compatible vsnprintf()
call
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Dovecot Mailing List dovecot@dovecot.org
Date:
It is like the following in the generated Makefile:
MODULE_SUFFIX = .so
--- On Fri, 6/13/08, Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] configure error on HP-UX: C99 compatible vsnprintf()
call
To: Dovecot Mailing List
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 00:55 -0700, Woonsan Ko wrote:
It is like the following in the generated Makefile:
MODULE_SUFFIX = .so
Are the plugins created using .so or .sl suffix?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Actually I'm testing with two HP-UX machine here.
[1] `uname': HP-UX B.11.23 U
`model': 9000/800/rp3440
CPU: PA-RISC
`aCC --version': HP ANSI C++ B3910B A.03.80
[2] `uname': HP-UX B.11.23 U ia64
`model': ia64 hp server rx5670
CPU: Itanium
`aCC --version': HP aC++/ANSI C
Hi,
I'm using dovecot for the first time on a production server (before
dovecot I used bincimapd). I have a question about the number of imap
(not imap-login) processes created for a user. I've seen 100+
processes for just 1 user. So far it only occurs for 1 user, other
users have just 1
By the way, on the [1] machine, I succeeded in `make' by using gcc like the
following:
$ ./configure CC=/opt/hp-gcc64-4.2.1/bin/gcc
[1] `uname': HP-UX B.11.23 U
`model': 9000/800/rp3440
CPU: PA-RISC
`aCC --version': HP ANSI C++ B3910B A.03.80
The plugins are created with .sl
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc10.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc10.tar.gz.sig
v1.1.0 will be released on next Friday if nothing horrible happens.
* LIST X-STATUS renamed to LIST STATUS and fixed its behavior with
LIST-EXTENDED
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 02:09 -0700, Woonsan Ko wrote:
By the way, on the [1] machine, I succeeded in `make' by using gcc like the
following:
$ ./configure CC=/opt/hp-gcc64-4.2.1/bin/gcc
[1] `uname': HP-UX B.11.23 U
`model': 9000/800/rp3440
CPU: PA-RISC
`aCC --version': HP
Dovecot version: 1.1-rc8, 1.1-rc9
System: Linux-2.6.2x
User-Agent: claws-mail-3.3 and 3.4
When appending messages (e.g. copy from mailclient local folder or
second server to dovecot imap folder) dovecot answers with:
tag OK [APPENDUID n m] Append completed\r\n
This answer often reaches the
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 10:58 +0200, Martijn de Munnik wrote:
Hi,
I'm using dovecot for the first time on a production server (before
dovecot I used bincimapd). I have a question about the number of imap
(not imap-login) processes created for a user. I've seen 100+
processes for just 1
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 11:04 +0200, Bruno Prémont wrote:
The attached patch makes dovecot send the whole answer in a single
packet, thus not triggering the delay issue.
Although the patch works for this APPEND case, it probably adds
I succeeded in installing rc10 under HP-UX PA-RISC machine with gcc
(hp-gcc64-4.2.1). It created .sl suffixed libraries.
Also, I succeeded in making rc10 under HP-UX Itanium machine with the following
configuration:
$ ./configure CC=/opt/aCC/bin/aCC -AC99
It created .so suffixed libraries.
Just for info - release 1.1.rc10 builds successfully on Fedora Rawhide
on all 4 architectures.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=660479
Dan
--
Fedora and Red Hat package maintainer
Hello,
i'm using in my installation qmail+vpopmail and now I have migrated from
courier-imap to dovecot.
Dovecot is very much faster with large mailbox than courier-imap.
But I have a problem.
vpopmail has a feature that allows you to Disable non webmail IMAP access,
many webmail using imap
On Jun 13, 2008, at 7:02 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
Just for info - release 1.1.rc10 builds successfully on Fedora Rawhide
on all 4 architectures.
Also compiles successfully on OS X 10.4.11 using...
./configure --with-ssldir=/System/Library/OpenSSL --with-ssl=openssl
--with-notify=kqueue
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 15:08 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
Hello,
Well, I have a brain-dead user (using Thunderbird 2.0.0.14) who just
won't listen when I tell them not to try to move 5000+ messages at one
time (or if deleting, bypass the Trash), and they managed to
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 01:57 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
There's no Dovecot v1.0 used anywhere? How did you get these
dovecot-uidlist files created? Did you use a Courier migration script
or
rename them manually?
I used courier migration script.
These error messages can happen only when
Hi -
Last year I set up a new CentOS 5 server and through the install
process permitted it to set up dovecot as my IMAP server.
./dovecote --version returns 1.0.rc15
With the system up and running I moved the tar files of my old email
accounts over and everything seemed to be just fine.
Hi,
I am migrating from 0.99.14 to 1.1.rc10 and from mbox to maildir.
During the conversion, via convert plugin, I get this assertion failure:
2008-06-13 14:12:51 Error: IMAP(username): Next message unexpectedly lost from
4700
2008-06-13 14:12:51 Error: IMAP(username): Next message
At 5:08 AM +0300 6/13/08, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 19:28 -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
At 1:17 AM +0300 6/13/08, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 11:10 -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
[...]
However, I DO clobber the dovecot-uidlist in .Trash as part of my
monthly
On 6/13/2008, Dan Roberts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
./dovecote --version returns 1.0.rc15
Upgrade... then we'll talk...
rc15 is just too old and buggy...
--
Best regards,
Charles
Charles Marcus píše v Pá 13. 06. 2008 v 11:50 -0400:
On 6/13/2008, Dan Roberts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
./dovecote --version returns 1.0.rc15
Upgrade... then we'll talk...
rc15 is just too old and buggy...
When CentOS 5.2 is released (I hope it is only very few weeks away), you
will
On 6/13/2008, Dan Horák ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
When CentOS 5.2 is released (I hope it is only very few weeks away), you
will get 1.0.7, the same as is in RHEL 5.2.
I would *never* use any OS/distro that dictated what version of what s/w
I could run.
In this case, all you need to do is
The intent on my part was not to be trapped, but to simplify life. I
don't work at a command line or system level on a regular enough basis
these days to be 100% confident that I won't screw it up, so relying
on a system that is pseudo capable of keeping itself together was a
saccrifice
on 6-13-2008 10:24 AM Dan Roberts spake the following:
The intent on my part was not to be trapped, but to simplify life. I
don't work at a command line or system level on a regular enough basis
these days to be 100% confident that I won't screw it up, so relying on
a system that is pseudo
On 6/13/2008, Dan Roberts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Using Yum (or whatever it is called) I thought things were up to
date. Though I use to hack code and fearlessly write perl, my
skills are rusty and I don't want to blow a whole in the system.
As I said... add atrpms.net to your available
Scott Silva wrote:
on 6-13-2008 10:24 AM Dan Roberts spake the following:
The intent on my part was not to be trapped, but to simplify life.
I don't work at a command line or system level on a regular enough
basis these days to be 100% confident that I won't screw it up, so
relying on a
On Jun 13, 2008, at 5:44 PM, Dan Roberts wrote:
mail_location: mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u
Like others said, mbox is your problem. For migrating to maildir, see
for example http://wiki.dovecot.org/Migration/MailFormat. Don't bother
trying the convert plugin though, it's broken in
33 matches
Mail list logo
