* Claudio Prono [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Same problem to me... :(
What can be the problem?
What I'm seeeing is this:
* people are (according to deliver imap) over quota
* when I check the maildirsite file I see stuff like
744288000S
78182 4815
-200635743 -15
-100099910 -14
Which - to me -
Hello
I have a user that experience troubles with it's pop3 client (eudora)
at random time/hour the dovecot server refuse the connection to his
machine during several minutes then it restart normally to download its emails
...
the message is like the following :
dovecot: Oct 09 15:36:35
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 23:33 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 22:01 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
When is the maildir quota usages recalculated and written to the
second line of the maildirsize file?
I'm using 1.1.4, and I reset the quotas for my users by just taking
Same problem to me... :(
What can be the problem?
Ralf Hildebrandt ha scritto:
* Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
How badly wrong are your quotas?
Totally off. The recalculation after 15m doesn't work at all
3-6 examples?
How about 15.000?
My users get a lot
On Oct 10, 2008, at 2:19 PM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
dovecot: Oct 09 15:36:35 Info: pop3-login: Internal login failure
(auth failed, 1 attempts): user=xxx,
Internal login failure means that it should have logged a real error
message. The error messages may be elsewhere than these
I have just switched my mail server. I have copied (I think) the config files
from the old to new. Exim is work fine on the new machine as I can see email
file showing up in /var/mail/lists/new . However, dovecot reports nothing when
I check mail . I am have turn on logging on both machines
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 10:51 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Claudio Prono [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Same problem to me... :(
What can be the problem?
What I'm seeeing is this:
* people are (according to deliver imap) over quota
* when I check the maildirsite file I see stuff like
Cotiatododia (with upper case C) is in the first line but
cotiatododia (lower case) is only on the second one.
My rule is case sensitive (as far as I know):
if anyof (header :contains [From, Reply-To, To, Cc]
[cotiatododia, ganhedinheiro.com, 1000deaths.com, ione.correia,
nsbezerra,
* Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
a) = file is 5120 bytes
b) file is older than 15 mins and it contains more than two lines
(header + the first value line)
Actually I forgot one important part about b): It's only done if user is
over quota.
Aha!
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL
CJ Keist [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[On why mbox and not maildir]
It's to do with how our current file services are setup and a personal
preference and familiarity with the mbox format.
FWIW it was familiarity with mbox, and that maildir was a big unknown
for me, that almost made me choose mbox.
But
Steinar Bang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I can see one issue with it, when using rsync to back up the mailboxes
to a different machine:
since the file names of the articles change when they are read, and when
the state changes, rsync may ending up transferring the same article
more than once (unless
Started with a new conf file and now it's working. I guess there is a
configuration difference between 1.0.14 and 1.1.2
On Fri October 10 2008 08:01:34 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just switched my mail server. I have copied (I think) the config files
from the old to new. Exim is
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:52:22 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Started with a new conf file and now it's working. I guess there is a
configuration difference between 1.0.14 and 1.1.2
/snip
For future reference: http://wiki.dovecot.org/Upgrading/1.1
--
Elisamuel Resto | GPG:
2) recompiled dovecot without optimization (ie, gcc -O0 instead of -O2)
(as per http://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot@dovecot.org/msg12936.html)
The problem here turned out to be a bug in Sun CC (and gcc -O2
apparently worked after all, so maybe a problem with testing).
Thanks. I'll
I'm sorry it is my mistake
I forgot to add a stop. There was another rule at the bottom of my script:
if allof (header :contains X-Spam-Flag YES) {
fileinto Junk;
}
which overruled the first
I apologize for taking your time.
Sincerely,
Dennis
-
Sascha Wilde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sep 30, 2008, at 6:08 PM, Sascha Wilde wrote:
[...]
So I guess what is needed is a new userdb backend which is explicitly
runs an arbitrary external program to get the user data (instead of
caching the passdb
On Oct 10, 2008, at 9:22 PM, Steven Winikoff wrote:
I had hoped v1.1.3 would have fixed this. But perhaps this is also
related to the disk quota issues. Are there any other errors that are
logged before the assert?
Nothing obvious, I'm afraid. For example, this occurence is typical
of
the
[...]
Oct 8 13:56:40 alcor dovecot: Panic: imap[15143] USER4,
NNN.NNN.NNN.NNN: file index-mail.c: line 1091 (index_mail_close):
assertion failed: (!mail-data.destroying_stream)
Hmm. I think I thought of a different assert before when commenting.
This assert should be fixed by 1.1.4 /
18 matches
Mail list logo
