Dear team,
I'm sorry if this is a stupid question, but I'd like to know the behavior
of dovecot in a particular stuation. My questions are as follows.
In /etc/dovecot-ldap.conf, 'hosts=' field is the one which can be used
to specify availabled ldap server to access from the clients to authorize.
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
On Jan 18, 2009, at 7:45 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Hi Timo
i found the bug
with autocreate in dovecot 1.2
last weeks i tested a lot with namespaces
i finally declared shared namespace before private namespace
in dovecot.conf by doing a lot of copy paste
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, Seth Mattinen wrote:
As a mail admin, I never want to see deliver generating its own messages to
potentially forged addresses and spamming innocent people. The MTA should do
this during the SMTP transaction.
Which MTA tries
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Is there any reason not to make (for v1.2)
1) deliver -e behavior the defaut?
2) not even provide the option for the current default (have deliver send
bounces itself)?
I have no objections again 1)
On 1/18/2009 2:58 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
2) not even provide the option for the current default (have deliver
send bounces itself)?
I assume you mean respond with an smtp-reject?
My understanding of 'bounces' is they should only ever be generated by
the SENDERS MTA?
--
Best regards,
On 1/18/2009 5:47 PM, Gary V wrote:
The only functional difference I can see (at least as far
as 'over quota' is concerned) is who sends the bounce (and
subsequently - what message the bounce contains). If that's the case,
it's a matter of which notification the mail admin prefers.
Again...
You message was rejected by... no thank you, I do not want ever to see
this:
On M 19 Jan, 2009, at 10:24 , Steffen Kaiser wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, Seth Mattinen wrote:
As a mail admin, I never want to see deliver generating its own
messages to potentially forged addresses and spamming
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:26:46PM -0700, Gary V wrote:
Just as a matter of interest. On my Postfix system:
a) Using deliver -e, Postfix bounces the message immediately 5.7.0 -
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender. Partial body:
t...@example.com: permission denied. Command output:
Hello again,
I have a coding question again:
I can obtain the path of the current user's mailbox with the function
mail_storage_get_mailbox_path(...) - so far so good. But is it possible to get
this mailbox path for another user than the logged in one?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards.
Stefan
Steffen Kaiser schrieb:
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, Seth Mattinen wrote:
As a mail admin, I never want to see deliver generating its own
messages to potentially forged addresses and spamming innocent people.
The MTA should do this during the SMTP transaction.
Which MTA tries to deliver the mail
hi,
I have problems with the dovecot-uidlist in version 1.1.4 and 1.1.8.
I was using dovecot 1.1.4 and think, I fix it with new dovecot 1.1.8, but
still the same problem.
Here a discription to reconstruct the problem:
I have an fit dovecot-uidlist with one email in cur/ folder.
Now I try to
* Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
Did that and recompiled, deactivated valgrind, let's see what happens.
Right now I don't see any more libc related crashes.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (ralf.hildebra...@charite.de) snick...@charite.de
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung
Outlook 2007 allows you to change the destination of deleted
items Check your outlook settings...
On Jan 16, 2009, at 3:06 AM, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
Hello.
Our clients use damn Outlook 2007 and it is can not move deleted
messages to Trash folder.
As I see dovecot have a
Romer Ventura пишет:
Outlook 2007 allows you to change the destination of deleted items
Check your outlook settings...
Well I search it but not found anything.
I can do 2 things:
Expunge all deleted on exit
Expunge all deleted on folder change.
On Jan 16, 2009, at 3:06 AM, Proskurin
On Jan 19, 2009, at 7:30 AM, Stefan Jurisch wrote:
I have a coding question again:
I can obtain the path of the current user's mailbox with the
function mail_storage_get_mailbox_path(...) - so far so good. But is
it possible to get this mailbox path for another user than the
logged in
On Jan 19, 2009, at 7:12 AM, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
I found what if you have a something like this:
autocreate = Trash
autocreate2 = Sent
autocreate3 = Spam
*Then I delete autocreate2 string* and... autocreate3 will not work.
If I add autocreate2 - all work well.
Yes it is seems to be right
On Jan 19, 2009, at 3:04 AM, Masaharu Kawada wrote:
In /etc/dovecot-ldap.conf, 'hosts=' field is the one which can be used
to specify availabled ldap server to access from the clients to
authorize.
And also sevral ldap servers can be specified in 'hosts =' field as
shown
like below.
hosts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Proskurin Kirill said the following on 19/01/09 16:06:
Well I search it but not found anything.
Outlook settings are a mess!
In some tab of the Options menu, you should find a button that opens a window
where you can specify the location of
On Jan 19, 2009, at 9:39 AM, Stephan Dietrich wrote:
After this I look into the dovecot-uidlist and I see this new email
only!
The dovecot-uidlist is rewritten, but only this this new incoming
email.
After login into mailbox, make a SELECT INBOX and NOOP, the
dovecot-uidlist is rewritten
Hmm, okay... thanks. :-)
But this brings me to the following short question: is the 1.2 code stable
enough to be used productive? And when do you think might the first stable
release of the 1.2 come up?
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:32:12AM -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Jan 19, 2009, at 7:30
Try to run 'cat /proc/sys/fs/epoll/max_user_instances' . It will propablly
print 128 which is default on recent kernels. You need to raise to say
1024 using 'echo 1204 /proc/sys/fs/epoll/max_user_instances' or via
sysctl.
--
View this message in context:
Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, Seth Mattinen wrote:
As a mail admin, I never want to see deliver generating its own
messages to potentially forged addresses and spamming innocent people.
The MTA should do this during the SMTP
Robert Schetterer wrote:
Steffen Kaiser schrieb:
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, Seth Mattinen wrote:
As a mail admin, I never want to see deliver generating its own
messages to potentially forged addresses and spamming innocent people.
The MTA should do this during the SMTP transaction.
Which MTA
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 17:06 +0100, Stefan Jurisch wrote:
Hmm, okay... thanks. :-)
But this brings me to the following short question: is the 1.2 code
stable enough to be used productive?
It should be pretty good, but I don't know if there are many real world
users yet.
And when do you
Well, that sounds good. If this version is stable enough and the beta will come
soon, then it should be enough for us at the moment.
Perhaps you should know: we implement groupware servers for our customers, and
we like dovecot because it is quite easy to implement multidomain virtual
mailbox
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 18:16 +0100, Stefan Jurisch wrote:
Well, that sounds good. If this version is stable enough and the beta will
come soon, then it should be enough for us at the moment.
Perhaps you should know: we implement groupware servers for our customers,
and we like dovecot
Hi,
are there any known issues with symlinked-shared-mailboxes and kmail?
I use virtual users (LDAP), so there are no unix-permissions related
problems here: all mailboxes are owned by the local user vmail.
Each user maildir has some symlinks to shared mailboxes. This works
fine if I use
Outlook 2007 allows you to change the destination of deleted
items Check your outlook settings...
On Jan 16, 2009, at 3:06 AM, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
Hello.
Our clients use damn Outlook 2007 and it is can not move deleted
messages to Trash folder.
As I see dovecot have a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Proskurin Kirill said the following on 19/01/09 16:06:
Well I search it but not found anything.
Outlook settings are a mess!
In some tab of the Options menu, you should find a button that opens a
window
where you can specify the location of
Just wondering if you don't respond to donations or don't get notified?
On 1/19/2009 11:51 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
http://vda.sourceforge.net/
Just realize using this patch will void the postfix warranty (you won't
get much help on the postfix list)...
--
Best regards,
Charles
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 1/19/2009 11:51 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
http://vda.sourceforge.net/
Just realize using this patch will void the postfix warranty (you won't
get much help on the postfix list)...
I've never personally used it so i can't vouch for it (I prefer using a
pre-queue
Hi,
ok, I'm am developing a new solution that includes dovecot, and will be
wanting to use the latest sieve implementation, so I have chosen to
start with 1.2 as the base.
I had a working install of 1.1.8 installed, and got a checkpassword
setup working properly with it to authenticate a user. I
Hi,
according to the both discussions in the last few days I've tried to
find a solution for Postfix with a PostgreSQL back-end.
Its working nice for regular recipient addresses like u...@example.com
and addresses with an extension like user+...@example.com.
Alias addresses are currently ignored.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff Grossman said the following on 19/01/09 18:43:
You are thinking of Outlook Express or Windows Mail. Outlook does not
have a Special Folders setting.
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 11:44 -0800, Ed Ewing wrote:
Just wondering if you don't respond to donations or don't get notified?
I haven't even thought about it before. Maybe I should start doing it.
Anyway: I did see a donation from you, thanks!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 12:17 -0800, Tim Traver wrote:
Is it possible that checks for the return code from calling the
checkpassword script have changed between the versions??? I currently
exit the checkpassword script with _exit(0); to make the status 0 when
it is successful, and I also set the
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 18:32 +0100, Wilhelm Meier wrote:
kmail instead seems to have some problems: if I save a mail into the
shared-folder, the other users are seeing this new mail almost
immediately. But if I delete(!) a mail from the shared-folder, the
list of the other kmails remains
On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 23:32 -0800, JANE CUA wrote:
sample temp files that gets create in /var/spool/mail
-rw-- jane mail _43398509485894865jane
I'm certain Dovecot didn't create this file at least directly.
-rw-- jane mail jane.lock
This is a dotlock and it can be
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 12:17 -0800, Tim Traver wrote:
Is it possible that checks for the return code from calling the
checkpassword script have changed between the versions??? I currently
exit the checkpassword script with _exit(0); to make the status 0 when
it is
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 14:51 -0800, Tim Traver wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 12:17 -0800, Tim Traver wrote:
Is it possible that checks for the return code from calling the
checkpassword script have changed between the versions??? I currently
exit the checkpassword
On 1/19/09, Ulrich Zehl wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:26:46PM -0700, Gary V wrote:
Just as a matter of interest. On my Postfix system:
a) Using deliver -e, Postfix bounces the message immediately 5.7.0 -
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender. Partial body:
t...@example.com:
Right, thank you so much. I thought there was something like
delay_warning_time that could make c) a workable choice. In fact, now
I remember setting that up on my production server (when I had one a
year ago) so senders would get notified their mail was still queued:
But then this creates an
Dear list,
Thank you very much for your quick answer.
This question is actually due to a phenomenon that the customer
got about a month ago. For the detail of the phenomenon, please
see bellow.
**
-2008/11/16
The customer updated openldap package
openldap-2.2.13-6.4E ⇒
Hi all,
I am running Dovecot v1.1.7 in a relatively quiet and calm environment.
Suddenly overnight cron job started throwing out errors like:
/usr/sbin/dovecot --exec-mail ext /usr/lib/dovecot/expire-tool
Error: userdb(us...@mail.example) didn't return a home directory
Error:
Hello,
Yet I do not know, what functionality the 1.2 provides. In fact I just need an
implementation of the 4 IMAP commands MYRIGHTS, GETACL, SETACL and DELETEACL
and the ability for the user to share mailboxes himself by using these commands.
The groupware we distribute (Open-Xchange, perhaps
Masaharu Kawada a écrit :
I'm pretty sure that configuration will simply use both the servers
all the time more or less randomly. Unless OpenLDAP library has some
code that does something similar to what you're talking about, but
somehow I doubt that.
Here we use uris parameter instead
47 matches
Mail list logo
