Hi
By playing around with imap acl I managed to get another crash.
Setup is the same as in my last crash report ("1.2 beta4, crash with
ACL"), except updated from beta4 to rc2 and added the slash to the
prefix, as suggested by Timo: prefix: shared/%%d/%%n/
What I did:
logged in as sales
2 setacl
v1.2.rc1 + config rewrite + multi-dbox:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.3/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hmmm. I'm having difficulty finding a good place for a global Sieve script.
The problem seems to be related to saving the compiled version
(xxx.svbin.tmp) in the same location as the script (xxx.sieve), which
happens using the credentials of the recipient user.
i.e.
drwxr-xr-x dovecoter dovecote
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 14:17 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> As clean as this code compiles, there are still a couple of warnings I
> noticed. If these are being ignored on purpose - please ignore me. But
> if these have slipped through - sometimes another pair of eyes helps.
>
> index-mail.c: I
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/rc/dovecot-1.2.rc2.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/rc/dovecot-1.2.rc2.tar.gz.sig
Somehow I forgot to check that "make distcheck" finished successfully in
rc1, so rc1 didn't actually even fully compile. No other changes since
rc1 than th
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/rc/dovecot-1.2.rc2.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/rc/dovecot-1.2.rc2.tar.gz.sig
Somehow I forgot to check that "make distcheck" finished successfully in
rc1, so rc1 didn't actually even fully compile. No other changes since
rc1 than th
> On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 13:43 -0700, James Butler wrote:
>> And if it's not too much trouble, is there a way to include currently
>> un-included extensions, like 'editheader', into Dovecot/Sieve? How
>> complicated is it? I'm guessing that it is more complicated than simply
>> writing a Capability
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 13:43 -0700, James Butler wrote:
> And if it's not too much trouble, is there a way to include currently
> un-included extensions, like 'editheader', into Dovecot/Sieve? How
> complicated is it? I'm guessing that it is more complicated than simply
> writing a Capability defini
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/rc/dovecot-1.2.rc2.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/rc/dovecot-1.2.rc2.tar.gz.sig
Somehow I forgot to check that "make distcheck" finished successfully in
rc1, so rc1 didn't actually even fully compile. No other changes since
rc1 than the compile fix.
signa
And if it's not too much trouble, is there a way to include currently
un-included extensions, like 'editheader', into Dovecot/Sieve? How
complicated is it? I'm guessing that it is more complicated than simply
writing a Capability definition and generating a plugin ...
James
> On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 13:08 -0700, James Butler wrote:
>> - Dovecot v.1.2.beta4
>> - Sieve 0.1.4
>>
>> I am getting this in my sieve log:
>>
>> main script: line 7: error: unsupported sieve capability 'editheader'.
>
> Right, this isn't supported.
>
>> main script: line 7: error: unsupported siev
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 12:42 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
> make[4]: *** No rule to make target `rquota.x', needed by `rquota.h'. Stop.
:(
I always run "make distcheck", but this was probably the first time when
I didn't actually look at its result afterwards. Oh well, have to
release rc2 then.
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 13:23 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> Will Sieve become part of the standard distribution? Or will remain a
> patch/add-on for the foreseeable future?
The managesieve patch will hopefully go away around v2.0 release, but
it'll remain as a separate package.
signature.asc
D
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 13:08 -0700, James Butler wrote:
> - Dovecot v.1.2.beta4
> - Sieve 0.1.4
>
> I am getting this in my sieve log:
>
> main script: line 7: error: unsupported sieve capability 'editheader'.
Right, this isn't supported.
> main script: line 7: error: unsupported sieve capabilit
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 12:34 -0700, James Butler wrote:
How can I add an extension to Dovecot's Sieve implementation?
I would like to use 'editheader' and 'redirect'.
I'm not really sure what you mean. editheader isn't implemented,
although Konstantin is apparently
> On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 12:34 -0700, James Butler wrote:
>> How can I add an extension to Dovecot's Sieve implementation?
>>
>> I would like to use 'editheader' and 'redirect'.
>
> I'm not really sure what you mean. editheader isn't implemented,
> although Konstantin is apparently trying to impleme
> http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/rc/dovecot-1.2.rc1.tar.gz
> http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/rc/dovecot-1.2.rc1.tar.gz.sig
>
> I think it's time to get v1.2.0 out soon. Shared mailbox code is
> beginning to look like it's working and other features should work fine
> also. I don't really see any r
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 12:34 -0700, James Butler wrote:
> How can I add an extension to Dovecot's Sieve implementation?
>
> I would like to use 'editheader' and 'redirect'.
I'm not really sure what you mean. editheader isn't implemented,
although Konstantin is apparently trying to implement it for
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 14:34 -0500, Thomas M Goerger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having a problem with a webmail client trying to open multiple IMAP
> connections with dovecot, and hitting a cap. I see from the error logs
> from this program that it's hitting the mail_max_userip_connections cap,
> but I'
How can I add an extension to Dovecot's Sieve implementation?
I would like to use 'editheader' and 'redirect'.
Thank you!
James
Hi,
I'm having a problem with a webmail client trying to open multiple IMAP
connections with dovecot, and hitting a cap. I see from the error logs
from this program that it's hitting the mail_max_userip_connections cap,
but I'm not seeing this value as defined in the dovecot.conf file. Would
thi
Thank you very much :-)
On Apr 3, 2009, at 21:29 , Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 21:25 +0400, Konstantin Lepa wrote:
Yeah, but it doesn't work without i_stream_seek(stream, 0) before.
How can I remove EOH after i_stream_create_header_filter (second
'\n')? Is it possible?
You ca
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/rc/dovecot-1.2.rc1.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/rc/dovecot-1.2.rc1.tar.gz.sig
I think it's time to get v1.2.0 out soon. Shared mailbox code is
beginning to look like it's working and other features should work fine
also. I don't really see any reasons to d
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 21:25 +0400, Konstantin Lepa wrote:
> Yeah, but it doesn't work without i_stream_seek(stream, 0) before.
>
> How can I remove EOH after i_stream_create_header_filter (second
> '\n')? Is it possible?
You can give i_stream_create_header_filter() a callback function, which
ge
Yeah, but it doesn't work without i_stream_seek(stream, 0) before.
How can I remove EOH after i_stream_create_header_filter (second
'\n')? Is it possible?
I found next solution:
fname = t_strdup(mktemp("/tmp/temp.XX"));
fd = creat(fname, 0600);
* Timo Sirainen [2009-04-03 12:44]:
> On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 19:36 +0200, Holger Weiss wrote:
> > However, if the client does so, Dovecot will set the mtime of the
> > Maildir file in question to the date specified by the client even if
> > it's in the future. Since files with an mtime in the futu
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 17:37 +0400, Konstantin Lepa wrote:
> I fixed the problem and I created another :-)
>
> I removed header "Subject" and added "X-DSPAM: test value\n\n". Now,
> problem is message_get_header_size in create_stream_for_msgbody. It
> returns 0 :-( I don't know how to extract m
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 19:36 +0200, Holger Weiss wrote:
> However, if the client does so, Dovecot will set the mtime of the
> Maildir file in question to the date specified by the client even if
> it's in the future. Since files with an mtime in the future can cause
> all sorts of trouble (e.g., th
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 11:25 +0200, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
> Since I use "/usr/sbin/dovecot --exec-mail imap" from mutt I get a lot
> of these in my syslog:
>
> Apr 3 11:09:33 zenon IMAP(ldm): : Connection closed bytes=36/256
>
> Is it possible to suppress them while keeping the "re
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 12:37 +0200, Oli Schacher wrote:
> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
> #0 0x0011a664 in acl_shared_namespaces_add (ns=0x97cc720)
> at acl-shared-storage.c:52
> 52acl-shared-storage.c: No such file or directory.
> in acl-shared-storage.c
Oft
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 06:12 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 4/2/2009 6:24 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >> I think ACL changes should take immediate effect, or at least
> >> should be re-checked in reasonable intervals (which imo shouldn't
> >> exceed a few seconds).
>
> > I think this should work:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Apr 2, 2009, at 10:08 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
I can see where large mailservers would benefit from significant write
performance increases - but unless the server is being actively
limited by the local delivery agent, what other performance benefits
does this offer
* Ben Winslow [2009-04-03 10:59]:
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 01:14:47 +0200
> Holger Weiss wrote:
> > I'd guess most backup software will include files with an mtime newer
> > than the time of the previous backup in incremental backups. At
> > least, Bacula[*] and Veritas NetBackup do it that way.
>
On Apr 3, 2009, at 4:31 AM, Jiri Novosad wrote:
#0 0x003d5e60d6fc in ?? () from /lib64/libselinux.so.1
#1 0x003d5e60d86b in matchpathcon () from /lib64/libselinux.so.1
#2 0x003d64203d3b in ?? () from /usr/lib64/libkrb5support.so.0
#3 0x003d64204064 in krb5int_labeled_fopen ()
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 01:14:47 +0200
Holger Weiss wrote:
> I'd guess most backup software will include files with an mtime newer
> than the time of the previous backup in incremental backups. At
> least, Bacula[*] and Veritas NetBackup do it that way.
Aren't IMAP messages supposed to be immutable?
Also, i'd like to know how to cut last '\n' from header stream. If I
don't remove a last lf symbol, then all my headers'll added to message
body :-(
On Apr 3, 2009, at 17:37 , Konstantin Lepa wrote:
I fixed the problem and I created another :-)
I removed header "Subject" and added "X-DSPAM
I fixed the problem and I created another :-)
I removed header "Subject" and added "X-DSPAM: test value\n\n". Now,
problem is message_get_header_size in create_stream_for_msgbody. It
returns 0 :-( I don't know how to extract message body properly. Help
me to understand usage of struct messa
Timo Sirainen writes:
> On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 15:31 +0100, Jahnke-Zumbusch, Dirk wrote:
>> 1. I am puzzled about the credentials "i...@my.host.name" being obtained;
>> shouldn't this be
>>something like "imap/my.host.n...@my.realm" ?
>
> I don't know anything about Kerberos.
I suspect the "
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 20:08, Charles Marcus wrote:
> >> Hopefully you meant ntpd, not ntpdate... but I believe the OP was
> >> using a VM, so ntpd is not an option...
>
> > How is that so? we use some vmware and xen setups, and ntpd works
> > fine on both
>
> http://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Su
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
The limits in maildirsize file are ignored by Dovecot as long as you
defined quota_rules. So don't bother looking at them.
Thanks, that explains why my expectations about its contents were not met.
If then I do another IMAP GETQUOTAROOT the correct v
Hi
I'm betatesting the new acl features in dovecot 1.2.
System: Centos 5.2, dovecot 1.2beta4 built with the spec file from
http://dl.atrpms.net/all/dovecot.spec
I set up two accounts (sa...@domain, o...@domain), I could access them
both without problems (testing with Thunderbird)
Then I tried t
Hello.
I wrote the hook function for deliver. I want to add support of
editheaders in the plug-in for dovecot. For this purpose I wrote the
function rarules_get_stream. Remover of headrs works properly, but
adding does not work. I took Timo Sirainen's advice from http://markmail.org/message
On 4/2/2009 6:24 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> I think ACL changes should take immediate effect, or at least
>> should be re-checked in reasonable intervals (which imo shouldn't
>> exceed a few seconds).
> I think this should work:
>
> acl = vfile:/etc/dovecot/acls:cache_secs=1
>
> The default is
On 4/2/2009 6:05 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
>>> I see this all of the time on an EL4 machine when it is under
>>> high load. The clock is synced to ntp but I still get dovecot
>>> killing itself. Sometimes ntp looses sync but not always.
>> Hopefully you meant ntpd, not ntpdate... but I believe the OP
Hi,
Since I use "/usr/sbin/dovecot --exec-mail imap" from mutt I get a lot
of these in my syslog:
Apr 3 11:09:33 zenon IMAP(ldm): : Connection closed bytes=36/256
Is it possible to suppress them while keeping the "remote users"
messages:
Apr 3 10:52:05 zenon dovecot: IMAP(
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 06:28 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
>> On 4/1/2009 5:25 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
dovecot: Mar 27 12:00:34 Error: child 21838 (auth-worker) killed with
signal 6 (core not dumped)
dovecot: Mar 27 12:10:23 Error: child 22711 (auth-worker) kil
46 matches
Mail list logo
