http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.18.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.18.tar.gz.sig
A few more fixes to v1.1 series. It probably won't have many released
left.
+ dovecot -n/-a now outputs also lda settings.
- Maildir++ quota: Quota was sometimes
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.2.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.2.tar.gz.sig
Found and fixes several v1.2-specific bugs. Hopefully it's now stable
for most people's usage.
* GSSAPI: More changes to authentication. Hopefully good now.
*
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.18.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.18.tar.gz.sig
A few more fixes to v1.1 series. It probably won't have many released
left.
+ dovecot -n/-a now outputs also lda settings.
- Maildir++ quota: Quota was sometimes
Hi Timo,
building dovecot 1.2.2 on AIX (5.3) fails with the new !include feature:
settings.c, line 132.31: 1506-045 (S) Undeclared identifier GLOB_BRACE.
This is because AIX glob doesn't support GLOB_BRACE :-|
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 08:49 +0200, Ralf Becker wrote:
settings.c, line 132.31: 1506-045 (S) Undeclared identifier GLOB_BRACE.
This is because AIX glob doesn't support GLOB_BRACE :-|
Should have known.. Solaris is also broken, but BSDs are fine, so
hopefully not too many people will complain.
* Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi:
Is it possible that the entire virus-al mailbox gets deleted and
recreated (while the mailbox is open)?
No.
There may be processes that delete files/mails from the Maildir, though.
Do you have any UIDVALIDITY changed lines in logs?
# zfgrep -h virus-al
On Jul 27, 2009, at 3:11 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi:
Is it possible that the entire virus-al mailbox gets deleted and
recreated (while the mailbox is open)?
No.
There may be processes that delete files/mails from the Maildir,
though.
Do you have any
Timo Sirainen schrieb am 27.07.2009 08:54:
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 08:49 +0200, Ralf Becker wrote:
settings.c, line 132.31: 1506-045 (S) Undeclared identifier GLOB_BRACE.
This is because AIX glob doesn't support GLOB_BRACE :-|
Should have known.. Solaris is also broken, but BSDs are fine, so
* Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi:
# zfgrep -h virus-al /var/log/OLD/2009-07-*/pop3d-imapd.log |grep
UIDVALIDITY
Jul 2 02:27:19 postamt dovecot: IMAP(virus-al): Maildir /home/v/i/
virus-al/Maildir: UIDVALIDITY changed (1246493487 - 1246494049)
Jul 2 22:25:34 postamt dovecot: IMAP(virus-al):
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
The problem is most likely that since you're using LAYOUT=fs, gtd/ is
accessible using both namespaces. Change the virtual to something
like:
location = virtual:~/res/gtd
Excellent, that did the trick! Many thanks,
t
On Jul 27, 2009, at 3:29 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
OK, that definitely means something's either deleting dovecot-uidlist
files or changing that mailbox's index files in some way, which then
causes the UIDVALIDITY changed errors and/or next_uid changed errors.
Neither should really be
Hi Timo,
thanks for your time and analysis.
We upgraded our dovecot installations to
# dovecot --version
1.1.13
(Debian Lenny backport package) and the problem went away. It might have
been due to our particular infrastructure, now luckily it's working fine.
Regards,
Sandro
Timo Sirainen
Hi guys,
I already use Dovecot for imap/pop3 with some simple quota options.
I'm starting to look at the switch from maildrop to dovecot lda and
I'm wondering whether it's possible to do our unusual quota management
with the quota plugin.
We have the users total quota in MySQL along with a
On Jul 27, 2009, at 4:55 AM, Guy wrote:
We have the users total quota in MySQL along with a number of grace
days (counts up to 7). The amount of space used is stored in
maildirsize in the users maildir.
What we currently some bits of voodoo which allow the user to go up to
200% of their quota.
Where can I change this setting... Can't find this setting in dovecot.conf
Regards,
BTJ
--
---
Bjørn T Johansen
b...@havleik.no
Charles Marcus schreef:
On 7/27/2009 12:58 AM, Steve wrote:
Enough, I'm really only interested in further responses if someone
actually wants to respond to the subject of the message.
Here you go:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=276480
Thanks for trying, but that is not an
On 7/27/2009 6:22 AM, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
Where can I change this setting... Can't find this setting in dovecot.conf
mail_max_userip_connections = 10
Maximum number of IMAP connections allowed for a user from each IP
address. NOTE: The username is compared case-sensitively.
--
On Jul 27, 2009, at 5:06 AM, Peter Eriksson wrote:
mech-gssapi.c, line 276: undefined symbol: gss_mech_krb5
mech-gssapi.c, line 276: warning: improper pointer/integer
combination: arg #2
..
gss_mech_krb5 is not a valid variable on Solaris.
Oh, there are more GSSAPI implementations than just
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 06:32:43 -0400
Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 7/27/2009 6:22 AM, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
Where can I change this setting... Can't find this setting in
dovecot.conf
mail_max_userip_connections = 10
Maximum number of IMAP connections allowed
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 06:12:44 -0400
Von: Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com
An: Dovecot Mailing List dovecot@dovecot.org
Betreff: Re: [Dovecot] Gentoo overlay?
On 7/27/2009 12:58 AM, Steve wrote:
Enough, I'm really only interested in further
Hi,
I've just tried upgrading from 1.1.8 to 1.2.2. As soon as the new
version was started up the number of imap/pop3 processes began to
climb to 800+, where I normally have about 300 or so connections at
any given time. The load on the server also climbed to 150+.
I've reverted back to 1.1.18,
I've just tried upgrading from 1.1.8 to 1.2.2. As soon as the new
version was started up the number of imap/pop3 processes began to
climb to 800+, where I normally have about 300 or so connections at
any given time. The load on the server also climbed to 150+.
I've reverted back to 1.1.18, which
- kernel
r...@stoat:/# uname -a
Linux stoat.aluminati.org 2.6.24-23-server #1 SMP Mon Jan 26 01:36:05
UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux
- the output of dovecot --build-options
This is from the current 1.1.18 install, but 1.2 was compiled with the
same configuration options, so they should be the
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Another issue when building 1.2.2 that wasn't there with 1.2.1 is that
-lsocket seems
to be missing causing linking errors. One example:
Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/cd29b745c8dd
It is not working for me. -lrt is already set before checking
If you want to run Dovecot on Debian Lenny for a Production System (with
Fast Upgrade System for Security Patches),
What would you recommend?
Stick to the current port with Dovecot Version 1.0.15 (1:1.0.15-2.3)
Use Backports Version 1.1.13 (1:1.1.13-2~bpo50+1)
or Use any of the packages from:
Mario Antonio wrote:
If you want to run Dovecot on Debian Lenny for a Production System (with
Fast Upgrade System for Security Patches),
What would you recommend?
Stick to the current port with Dovecot Version 1.0.15 (1:1.0.15-2.3)
This version is ancient. The last release is 13 months old.
Hello, dovecot-users ...
as you may read at
http://lists.horde.org/archives/horde/Week-of-Mon-20090706/037786.html
I am stuck getting dovecot-sieve working with the ingo-application of
the horde-framework.
To me it seems as if ingo doesn't even trigger any request/command to
managesieve ... I
On Monday 27 July 2009 16:21:53 Stephan Bosch wrote:
or Use any of the packages from:
Dovecot v1.2 for Debian Testing (binary and source):
deb http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/ testing-auto/dovecot-1.2 main
deb-src http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/ testing-auto/dovecot-1.2 main
Stefan G. Weichinger schrieb:
Hello, dovecot-users ...
as you may read at
http://lists.horde.org/archives/horde/Week-of-Mon-20090706/037786.html
I am stuck getting dovecot-sieve working with the ingo-application of
the horde-framework.
To me it seems as if ingo doesn't even trigger
Charles Marcus wrote:
A quick google shows: http://tiny.pl/hhc4k
Hi Charles
Writing a decent ebuild from scratch which is good enough to be accepted
IS fairly tricky, but the good news is a good enough one is fairly
straightforward.
Actually the whole thing sounds more grandiose than
Hi list
I'm trying to set up shared public folders with individual SEEN flags.
I've set up three test users, but as soon as one of them marks a mail in
the public folder as seen or unseen, that change is propagated to all
three users. If I watch the dovecot.index.log file in each user's
directory
Mario Antonio wrote:
If you want to run Dovecot on Debian Lenny for a Production System (with
Fast Upgrade System for Security Patches),
What would you recommend?
Stick to the current port with Dovecot Version 1.0.15 (1:1.0.15-2.3)
Use Backports Version 1.1.13 (1:1.1.13-2~bpo50+1)
Do you
On 7/27/2009 11:43 AM, Ed W wrote:
A quick google shows: http://tiny.pl/hhc4k
Writing a decent ebuild from scratch which is good enough to be accepted
IS fairly tricky, but the good news is a good enough one is fairly
straightforward.
Hi Ed,
Thanks very much for your detailed reply... I may
Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 11 Jul 2009, Ed W wrote:
per host (current situation is rather difficult... I'm using a cert
with multiple names on it, but this is hard to buy)
What expieriences do you have on client-side with those certs?
I
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
Let me state it again: nothing is gained with server-side *de*cryption
which can't be achieved more easily with disk encryption. Werver-side
encryption is another thing...
One use case is where you have regulatory or policy determination that
certain email should
I think there is a whitepaper from Dovecot's current main sponsor
(before they were called Rackspace) which described their architecture
using pairs of servers and DRBD between them. Each server is moderately
loaded and active. If one server fails then half the users don't notice
and the
Ed W wrote:
I think there is a whitepaper from Dovecot's current main sponsor
(before they were called Rackspace) which described their architecture
using pairs of servers and DRBD between them. Each server is moderately
loaded and active. If one server fails then half the users don't notice
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.2.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.2.tar.gz.sig
Refreshed ManageSieve patch:
http://www.rename-it.nl/dovecot/1.2/dovecot-1.2.2-managesieve-0.11.7.diff.gz
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.18.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.18.tar.gz.sig
Updated ManageSieve patch:
http://www.rename-it.nl/dovecot/1.1/dovecot-1.1.18-managesieve-0.10.7.diff.gz
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 10:22 -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Ed W wrote:
I think there is a whitepaper from Dovecot's current main sponsor
(before they were called Rackspace) which described their architecture
using pairs of servers and DRBD between them. Each server is moderately
loaded and
BTW. http://dovecot.org/talks/berlin-2009-07-02.pdf has a list of some
possible ways to cluster Dovecot.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sun, 2009-07-19 at 17:00 +, Diego Roversi wrote:
You shouldn't need more than one namespace. Try something like:
mail_location = maildir:~/Mail:INBOX=~/Mail/inbox:LAYOUT=fs
And only a single namespace.
Looks like it works:
b LIST *
* LIST (\HasNoChildren)
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 08:23 -0500, Mike Abbott wrote:
There is still lots of noise in the log though. The attached perl
script just sends and retrieves mail over and over:
..
When run against a Mac OS X server with dovecot-1.1.16 and dovecot's
deliver via postfix, there are lots of errors
Is that a normal HFS+ filesystem?
Yup.
Anything special done to it?
Nope.
With case-insensitive filenames?
Yup.
Have you tried my imaptest tool (http://imapwiki.org/ImapTest) to
see if it gives errors?
I'll try that soon and let you know.
BTW. Is there some really easy way to get
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 23:42 +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Hi Timo,
all of my tests fail
with expire plugin, mail simply not get deleted
i cant find any stuff in the logs why it does not or should not work.
Try with 1.2.2 and check the mails' save dates now that you have the
FETCH
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 15:02 +0200, Jernej Porenta wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Another issue when building 1.2.2 that wasn't there with 1.2.1 is that
-lsocket seems
to be missing causing linking errors. One example:
Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/cd29b745c8dd
It is not
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 12:14 +0100, Guy wrote:
I've just tried upgrading from 1.1.8 to 1.2.2. As soon as the new
version was started up the number of imap/pop3 processes began to
climb to 800+, where I normally have about 300 or so connections at
any given time. The load on the server also
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 16:56 +0100, Keith Edmunds wrote:
# ls -l /home/publicfolders/dovecot-shared
-rw-rw-r-- 1 publicfolders publicfolders 0 2009-07-27
15:01 /home/publicfolders/dovecot-shared
This file probably isn't in the right place. It needs to be in each
maildir under the
On Monday 20 July 2009 15:15:29 Michael wrote:
Hi,
Am 18.04.2009 22:31, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 22:26 +0200, Christian Rueger wrote:
dovecot: imap-login: Disconnected (no auth attempts): rip=Y.Y.Y.Y,
lip=X.X.X.X, TLS handshaking: SSL_accept() failed:
On Jul 27, 2009, at 8:02 PM, Brad wrote:
Jul 20 20:34:38 warden dovecot: imap-login: Disconnected (no auth
attempts): rip=80.237.136.4, lip=80.237.235.10, TLS handshaking: SS
L_accept() failed: error:03078041:bignum
routines:BN_EXPAND_INTERNAL:malloc failure
However, deleting the
50 matches
Mail list logo
