On Fre, 2009-12-18 at 18:32 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 12/18/2009, JW (j...@mailsw.com) wrote:
> > I'm sorry, I forgot to specify that I was using Debian Linux:
>
> You also forgot the bare neceesities, like dovecot version, dovecot -n
> output and log entries exhibiting the problem.
And fo
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:31:02 +0100
> Von: Stephan Bosch
> An: Dovecot Mailing List
> Betreff: Re: [Dovecot] Release candidates for Sieve v0.1.14 and ManageSieve
> v0.11.10 for Dovecot v1.2.8
> Steve wrote:
>
> >> Well, I got sued, so that took some o
On 12/18/2009, JW (j...@mailsw.com) wrote:
> I'm sorry, I forgot to specify that I was using Debian Linux:
You also forgot the bare neceesities, like dovecot version, dovecot -n
output and log entries exhibiting the problem.
I'm actually amazed at how many people post on support lists and say
'He
On Dec 18, 2009, at 6:12 PM, Mario Antonio wrote:
> JW wrote:You could try:
> /etc/security/limits.conf
>
>
>
> your_dovecot_user soft nofile 524288
> your_dovecot_user hard nofile 524288
I think these are read by PAM when user logs in. Dovecot never uses them. I'm
not sure if even setting ro
On Dec 18, 2009, at 5:57 PM, b...@electricembers.net wrote:
> with two separate dovecot/backend servers accessing one central mysql server,
> will it be ok to have them both use the same expires table? Or will that
> confuse the actual
> dovecot --exec-mail ext /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/expire-
JW wrote:
On Friday 18 December 2009 16:00:48 Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Dec 18, 2009, at 4:47 PM, JW wrote:
I've researched this problem a number of times, usually I see suggestions
to increase ulimit.
I've done this a number of times, all the way up to:
ulimit -n 8192
I've put that in
On Dec 18, 2009, at 5:46 PM, JW wrote:
> I'm sorry, I forgot to specify that I was using Debian Linux:
>
>
>echo -n "Starting $DESC: $NAME"
>ulimit -n 8192
>start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --oknodo --exec $DAEMON
Well, this seemed to work in Debian unstable.. So maybe
with two separate dovecot/backend servers accessing one central mysql
server, will it be ok to have them both use the same expires table? Or
will that confuse the actual
dovecot --exec-mail ext /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/expire-tool.sh
cronjob since some of the entries mailboxes won't exist loc
On Friday 18 December 2009 16:00:48 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Dec 18, 2009, at 4:47 PM, JW wrote:
> > I've researched this problem a number of times, usually I see suggestions
> > to increase ulimit.
> >
> > I've done this a number of times, all the way up to:
> >
> > ulimit -n 8192
> >
> > I've pu
On Dec 18, 2009, at 4:47 PM, JW wrote:
> I've researched this problem a number of times, usually I see suggestions to
> increase ulimit.
>
> I've done this a number of times, all the way up to:
>
> ulimit -n 8192
>
> I've put that in the init script right above the daemon start line.
What exac
On Dec 18, 2009, at 4:42 PM, Brandon Davidson wrote:
> The Wiki article on NFS states that 1.1 and newer will flush attribute
> caches if necessary with mail_nfs_storage=yes. We're running 1.2.8 with
> that set, as well as mail_nfs_index=yes, mmap_disable=yes and
> fsync_disable=no. We have a poo
In the past few months we've been having increasing problems with dovecot
timing out pop3 logins.
As best I can tell it gets to the point where it won't accept any new pop3
logins.
The error in the mail log is:
dovecot: pipe() failed: Too many open files
I've researched this problem a number
Hi Timo,
We've been running Dovecot with Maildir on NFS for quite a while - since
back in the 1.0 days I believe. I'm somewhat new here. Anyway...
The Wiki article on NFS states that 1.1 and newer will flush attribute
caches if necessary with mail_nfs_storage=yes. We're running 1.2.8 with
that s
Steve wrote:
Well, I got sued, so that took some of my attention.
How did it end for you? I hope, I wish it ended good for you?
Yes, for some reason the lawsuit was withdrawn the day before, probably
due to our written defense. I don't know. At least it's gone for now.
Regards,
Stephan.
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:21:21 +0100
> Von: Stephan Bosch
> An: Bruce Bodger
> CC: Dovecot Mailing List
> Betreff: Re: [Dovecot] Release candidates for Sieve v0.1.14 and ManageSieve
> v0.11.10 for Dovecot v1.2.8
> Bruce Bodger wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 25
Bruce Bodger wrote:
On Nov 25, 2009, at 4:51 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Hello Dovecot users,
I am getting closer to new releases for Sieve and ManageSieve for
Dovecot v1.2.8. However, the release for Sieve includes a large
restructuring of the sources to improve extension handling and to
rem
On Nov 25, 2009, at 4:51 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Hello Dovecot users,
I am getting closer to new releases for Sieve and ManageSieve for
Dovecot v1.2.8. However, the release for Sieve includes a large
restructuring of the sources to improve extension handling and to
remove global state.
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> On Dec 18, 2009, at 11:08 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator wrote:
>
We use the original RH dovecot-1.0.7, mbox-format and mailboxes up to 4
GB ... (historicaly grown ...)
>>> Have you set mbox_very_dirty_syncs=yes?
>> grep mbox_very_dirty_syncs /etc/dovecot.con
On Dec 18, 2009, at 11:08 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator wrote:
>>> We use the original RH dovecot-1.0.7, mbox-format and mailboxes up to 4
>>> GB ... (historicaly grown ...)
>>
>> Have you set mbox_very_dirty_syncs=yes?
>
> grep mbox_very_dirty_syncs /etc/dovecot.conf
> #mbox_very_dirty_syn
Hi Timo,
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> On Dec 18, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator wrote:
>
>> But the mailclients (mostly thunderbird and apple mail) still reporte
>> the timeouts by accessing the mailboxes.
>>
>> The server is doing smtp, imap/pop3, webmailsystem and
>> spam/antivir
On Dec 18, 2009, at 7:26 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On tor 17 dec 2009 21:30:37 CET, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote
Most everything seems to work but my webmail (roundcube) clients
are not seeing their subscribed folders.
roundcube 0.3.1 > settings > server settings > Use IMAP
Subscriptions (to
On Dec 18, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator wrote:
> But the mailclients (mostly thunderbird and apple mail) still reporte
> the timeouts by accessing the mailboxes.
>
> The server is doing smtp, imap/pop3, webmailsystem and
> spam/antivirus-checking all together. (RH EL 5, sendm
Hi,
since some time ago we do have a lot of "timeouts" connecting to our
imap/po3 server. This week I switched the whole system to a new dual
quadcore xeon, 24GB RAM, SAS2 RAID-10. (SUN Fire 4170)
But the mailclients (mostly thunderbird and apple mail) still reporte
the timeouts by accessing the
On tor 17 dec 2009 21:30:37 CET, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote
Most everything seems to work but my webmail (roundcube) clients are
not seeing their subscribed folders.
roundcube 0.3.1 > settings > server settings > Use IMAP Subscriptions (togle)
--
xpoint
pgpR5bCrVR5rM.pgp
Description: PGP dig
On 18/12/2009 15:08, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> We have something in the
>> region of 1000 concurrent connections and login_max_processes_count *
>> login_max_connections = 128 * 256 should be enough for 32000+ of them!
>>
>> Would it be better to have login_max_connections = 1024 (or even higher)?
>
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 14:56 +, Chris Wakelin wrote:
> > I guess the crash is caused by the "connection queue full". I'll see about
> > fixing the crash, but you shouldn't let it get full in any case. So
> > increase your login_max_connections value.
> >
>
> That's puzzling, I thought it was
On 18/12/2009 01:11, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2009, at 8:01 PM, Chris Wakelin wrote:
>
>>> Dec 18 00:27:58 imap-login: Info: Disconnected: Connection queue full (auth
>>> failed, 1 attempts): user=, method=PLAIN, rip=,
>>> lip=134.225.32.156, TLS
>>> Dec 18 00:27:58 imap-login: Panic: f
On Dec 18, 2009, at 8:41 AM, Daniel Campos wrote:
> We're planning to deploy a large e-mail system storing maildirs in a NAS
> system through NFS. One of the options we're thinking on is using
> Dovecot+EXIM.
>
> As far as I've read in both project's documentation, both services implement
> locki
On Sex, 18 Dez 2009, Daniel Campos wrote:
We're planning to deploy a large e-mail system storing maildirs in a NAS
system through NFS. One of the options we're thinking on is using
Dovecot+EXIM.
As far as I've read in both project's documentation, both services implement
locking allowing multipl
Hi all:
We're planning to deploy a large e-mail system storing maildirs in a NAS
system through NFS. One of the options we're thinking on is using
Dovecot+EXIM.
As far as I've read in both project's documentation, both services implement
locking allowing multiple servers to access the same maildi
30 matches
Mail list logo
