I am looking at porting and generalizing an old in-house patch that I'm
using for the CMU Sieve plugin. It allows sieve script to test lookup
arguments from LDAP.
Before getting too involved in this, I'd like to discuss my goals here
in the hopes that someone else also thinks this would be
Timo Sirainen put forth on 1/5/2010 1:32 AM:
On 5.1.2010, at 7.44, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
As we can see from the 1% I/O wait on CPU0 and 0% on CPU1, it's seems pretty
clear that the CPUs are being occupied by the dovecot search code, not by
disk
I/O.
v1.1+ has somewhat faster search code.
On 5.1.2010, at 10.02, Martin F. Foster wrote:
I am looking at porting and generalizing an old in-house patch that I'm using
for the CMU Sieve plugin. It allows sieve script to test lookup arguments
from LDAP.
..
Related work:
1. Pigeonhole low priority TODO would like to implement
On 5.1.2010, at 10.17, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
v1.1+ has somewhat faster search code. At least it's using boyer-moore with
some of my own uglyness to make it support incremental searches. Wonder if
there's a nicer and faster way to do that than what I implemented.
Hi Timo,
I'm not sure if
joa...@verona.se writes:
I'm looking for a spec/rpm file suitable for fedora 11/12,
for dovecot and pidgenhole sieve.
Has anyone done this yet? Otherwise I will attempt to the dovecot 1.2
spec files for f11.
I've done a rudimentary conversion of the f11 spec file for dovecot to
use
On Ter, 05 Jan 2010, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I've looked a little at both now and am still reading. One thing I
don't like
is that I'm seeing requirements a SQL server. That adds unnecessary
complexity
to the system and I'd rather avoid it if possible. IIRC, one of the
reasons I
chose
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 09:15:54AM -0200, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
On Ter, 05 Jan 2010, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I've looked a little at both now and am still reading. One thing I
don't like is that I'm seeing requirements a SQL server. That adds
unnecessary complexity to the system and I'd
Hello people,
After a lot of wading through the dovecot documentation (which btw, is
excellent !, everything lies under dovecot/doc/wiki), I managed to
authenticate a couple of accounts.
For starters, I want dovecot to work as an imap/imaps box and nothing
else.
So , I went ahead and created a
On 2010-01-04, David Abrahams (d...@boostpro.com) wrote:
The problem is that I really need to practice Inbox Zero. I need to
not see the things I've decided I'm through with (in every mail
client I use), and having the client decide I'm through when I've
read a message is highly prone to
On 2010-01-04, Ronald MacDonald (ron...@rmacd.com) wrote:
2010/1/4 Anthony Nedland anthony.nedl...@baldwin-telecom.net:
Charles Marcus wrote:
dovecot -n output shows which config file dovecot is actually using, as
opposed to which one you *think* it is using.
Then how do I change the one
On 1/4/2010 4:00 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Greetings everyone,
I'd like to install a webmail package on the same host. I used Squirrelmail for
this purpose many years ago and I wasn't wholly impressed with the user
interface. I'm also not impressed by the fact that I regularly receive spam
On 2010-01-04 4:21 PM, Pascal Volk wrote:
On 01/04/2010 10:11 PM Anthony Nedland wrote:
[picture]
This is the Dovecot mailing list - not a picture gallery!
Use `dovecot -n -c /etc/dovecot/dovecot-postfix.conf `
Question: if you use an alternate location for the config file, and
start
On 1/5/2010 1:32 AM, Ken Price wrote:
If this is more than a hobby system, then you'll need to account for
address books and personal settings for your users - at the least. That
means some sort of backend database.
I've been looking at Funambol lately to support some Blackberry users
Charles Marcus schrieb:
Question: if you use an alternate location for the config file, and
start dovecot with that config file properly, does plain 'dovecot -n'
output what is in the config file that is in use? Or the one in the
default location?
It's the default location:
t...@mail2:~$
On 2010-01-05 7:05 AM, Thomas Wolf wrote:
Charles Marcus schrieb:
Question: if you use an alternate location for the config file, and
start dovecot with that config file properly, does plain 'dovecot -n'
output what is in the config file that is in use? Or the one in the
default location?
Hi list
I'm still trying to get managesieve running on centos x64 with the
packages from atrpm. I used the 1.2.9 rpms (also rebuilt with the
lastet managesieve patches) but I'm always getting the same error when
trying to compile managesieve:
./configure --with-dovecot=/usr/lib64/dovecot/
Hi list
I'm still trying to get managesieve running on centos x64 with the
packages from atrpm. I used the 1.2.9 rpms (also rebuilt with the
lastet managesieve patches) but I'm always getting the same error when
trying to compile managesieve
try to rebuild official src.rpm package for
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-01-05 7:05 AM, Thomas Wolf wrote:
Charles Marcus schrieb:
Question: if you use an alternate location for the config file, and
start dovecot with that config file properly, does plain 'dovecot -n'
output what is in the config file that is in use? Or the one
Oli Schacher wrote:
Hi list
I'm still trying to get managesieve running on centos x64 with the
packages from atrpm. I used the 1.2.9 rpms (also rebuilt with the
lastet managesieve patches) but I'm always getting the same error when
trying to compile managesieve:
./configure
Quoting Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com:
So, what's the best FOSS IMAP enabled web mail front end with a modern
look/feel? I'd like to run it on lighttpd, which I'm already using,
not apache.
www.horde.org would work (there are debian ports). As to which is best,
depends on who you
Anthony Nedland wrote:
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-01-05 7:05 AM, Thomas Wolf wrote:
Charles Marcus schrieb:
Question: if you use an alternate location for the config file, and
start dovecot with that config file properly, does plain 'dovecot -n'
output what is in the config file that
Quoting Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com:
I've looked a little at both now and am still reading. One thing I
don't like
is that I'm seeing requirements a SQL server. That adds unnecessary
complexity
to the system and I'd rather avoid it if possible. IIRC, one of the
You can/could
I'm using Dovecot LDA with Exim. I'm also using Dictionary Quotas in a
MySQL database. I want to avoid backscatter completely, so I set
quota_full_tempfail = yes and handle quota checking in the Exim RCPT ACL
during the SMTP session. The problem lies in the case where a user's
account is nearly
So, to resolve your situation point --with-dovecot= to a compiled
Dovecot source tree as explained in the INSTALL/README file.
That was it! I finally got it running by pointing configure to the rpm
build dir instead of /usr/lib64/dovecot.
I'm also happy to see that Angel is building atrpm
Anthony Nedland wrote:
Anthony Nedland wrote:
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-01-05 7:05 AM, Thomas Wolf wrote:
Charles Marcus schrieb:
Question: if you use an alternate location for the config file, and
start dovecot with that config file properly, does plain 'dovecot -n'
output what is
On 2010-01-05, Anthony Nedland (anthony.nedl...@baldwin-telecom.net) wrote:
In my dovecot-postfix.conf mail_location = maildir:/var/vmail/%d/
Please post full dovecot -n output...
Also, whats your SQL query look like?
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-01-05, Anthony Nedland (anthony.nedl...@baldwin-telecom.net) wrote:
In my dovecot-postfix.conf mail_location = maildir:/var/vmail/%d/
Please post full dovecot -n output...
Also, whats your SQL query look like?
dovecot -n
# 1.1.11:
At Tue, 05 Jan 2010 06:50:23 -0500,
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-01-04, David Abrahams (d...@boostpro.com) wrote:
The problem is that I really need to practice Inbox Zero. I need to
not see the things I've decided I'm through with (in every mail
client I use), and having the client
At Mon, 4 Jan 2010 22:08:22 +0100,
Egbert Jan van den Bussche wrote:
Welcome!
Have a look at RoundCube webmail. I used to use squirrelmail but had the
same issues as you. RoundCube is very nice.
I second that emotion
--
Dave Abrahams Meet me at BoostCon: http://www.boostcon.com
On 11:59 AM, Carlos Williams wrote:
Is there a log level or something I am not searching for that will
allow me to see failed or invalid logins for Dovecot (IMAP)?
What auth method are you using? For example, if you are using pam, the
failures are probably in /var/log/secure.
--
Mark
I am using system users + filesystem quota + dovecot + postfix + debian.
Can't update my dovecot to a newer version :(
Some lines of my configuration file (dovecot.conf) are like this:
mail_location = mbox:/home/%u:INBOX=/var/mail/%u
mbox_lazy_writes = yes
protocol imap {
mail_plugins = quota
Aiko Barz wrote, On 2009. 12. 22. 11:08:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:32:00AM +0100, Papp Tamás wrote:
It's like when a messages is deleted from TB, the message get moved
to the Trash folder, and it's expunged(?) at the same time. Is it
possible?
Do you use TB2? And do you have two
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 5.1.2010, at 3.19, Ronald Johnson wrote:
I'm running Dovecot 1.2.9 and have noticed the IMAP list command does not
appear to send a sorted list of folders with list command.
I thought all IMAP clients did the sorting internally. So yeah, I haven't added
extra
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 11:09:07 -0500, Carlos Williams carlosw...@gmail.com
wrote:
I had a user telling me that they can't login to the Postfix email
server via Webmail (RoundCube) and I decided to see if I could locate
this issue in the logs and understand if the user was simply using a
wrong
34 matches
Mail list logo
