I've spent some time for the fine manual. Whats new?
Location: http://hg.localdomain.org/dovecot-2.0-man
So I don't have to flood the wiki with attachments.
As soon as the manual pages are complete, they will be included in the
Dovecot source tree.
Additional manual pages:
* doveconf(1)
Pascal,
On 5/31/10 11:40 PM, Pascal Volk user+dove...@localhost.localdomain.org
wrote:
I've spent some time for the fine manual. Whats new?
Location: http://hg.localdomain.org/dovecot-2.0-man
So I don't have to flood the wiki with attachments.
As soon as the manual pages are complete, they
On 06/01/2010 08:51 AM Brandon Davidson wrote:
This is fantastic. When I get a moment, I'll definitely read them over. I
spent a good bit of time getting a Dovecot 2.0 test system set up this
weekend and I found myself flipping back and forth between Timo's release
announcements, sample
Hi,
I checked everything and seems to be not right.
System is loosing lots of emails. I did a filter in the e-mail program
that puts a copy of nonspam/nonmailist/clearmessage into a local folder
and some messages dissappears from remote mail...
I received some messages last week and I have
Hi,
I am using Dovecot with mbox format, and I am interested to move to
Maildir. I have run the modified script (mb2md) but it seems UIDs are
not preserved. I don't know how to verify this, but my client seems to
be downloading all messages again.
Can someone help?
On 2010-06-01 4:27 AM, Gonzalo Aguilar Delgado wrote:
The same happens with thunderbird where I deleted the account and
recreated new... Nothing older than 7 days...
What can be happening?
Thunderbird does have the ability to automatically delete messages -
have you dbl-checked the
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Tools/dsync
It will probably do.
[]'sf.rique
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 6:17 AM, Greg Pearson deejay@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am using Dovecot with mbox format, and I am interested to move to
Maildir. I have run the modified script (mb2md) but it seems UIDs are not
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 17:30, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2010-05-28 5:01 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 16:53, Charles Marcus wrote:
The whole purpose of the -n output is to provide clean, easy to read
*settings* as seen by postfix (as opposed to
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 12:03, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:
That's what I do. I move them either to a (shared) ham or spam folder, and
run the script posted earlier, which processes and deletes them.
Thanks. I just wanted to be sure such a move would not effect
(corrupt) what Dovecot
I see no documents in the Dovecot documents wiki on how Dovecot
features can be used in the fight against spam. One hit came up in a
search, and it was about how to fight spam in the MoinMoin Wiki itself
(e.g. TextCHAs and such).
I already asked in another thread about removing message files at
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 09:42:18 -0400 Phil Howard wrote:
I see no documents in the Dovecot documents wiki on how Dovecot
features can be used in the fight against spam. One hit came up in a
search, and it was about how to fight spam in the MoinMoin Wiki itself
(e.g. TextCHAs and such).
Fighting
On 2010-06-01 8:39 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 17:30, Charles Marcus wrote:
Of course it is meant for people, but it is meant to show only the
bare minimum of what postfix sees as the settings. It is left up to
you, the sys admin, to be able to interpret the data as
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 09:54, Frank Elsner fr...@moltke28.b.shuttle.de wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 09:42:18 -0400 Phil Howard wrote:
I see no documents in the Dovecot documents wiki on how Dovecot
features can be used in the fight against spam. One hit came up in a
search, and it was about how
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 09:42:18 -0400
Phil Howard ttip...@gmail.com articulated:
I see no documents in the Dovecot documents wiki on how Dovecot
features can be used in the fight against spam. One hit came up in a
search, and it was about how to fight spam in the MoinMoin Wiki itself
(e.g.
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 09:56, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2010-06-01 8:39 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 17:30, Charles Marcus wrote:
Of course it is meant for people, but it is meant to show only the
bare minimum of what postfix sees as the settings. It
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 10:04, Jerry dovecot.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
The fight against SPAM is NOT Dovecots responsibility.
Whose responsibility is it to get detected spam delivered into the
correct folder? Dovecot deliver is typically used to deliver into the
Inbox(es). It would be
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 10:02:56 -0400 Phil Howard wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 09:54, Frank Elsner fr...@moltke28.b.shuttle.de
wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 09:42:18 -0400 Phil Howard wrote:
I see no documents in the Dovecot documents wiki on how Dovecot
features can be used in the fight against
On 2010-06-01 9:42 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
I see no documents in the Dovecot documents wiki on how Dovecot
features can be used in the fight against spam. One hit came up in a
search, and it was about how to fight spam in the MoinMoin Wiki itself
(e.g. TextCHAs and such).
1. Set up postfix
On 2010-06-01 10:34 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
There is also a plugin for dovecot that makes it easy for users to
reclassify stuff as spam or not spam by simply moving the messages to
the appropriate folder, but I think it is mainly designed for DSPAM...
anyone using it with spamassassin?
On Tuesday 01 June 2010 15:42:18 Phil Howard wrote:
I see no documents in the Dovecot documents wiki on how Dovecot
features can be used in the fight against spam. One hit came up in a
search, and it was about how to fight spam in the MoinMoin Wiki itself
(e.g. TextCHAs and such).
I guess
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 10:21, Frank Elsner fr...@moltke28.b.shuttle.de wrote:
Ok, you obviously have a different environment and requirements.
- I do the delivery into special folder by the MTA (exim) and the LDA is
not used at all.
- detection training is not done.
Sorry, my world may
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 10:45, Rainer Frey rainer.f...@inxmail.de wrote:
I guess you'll have the mental transfer of fight spam into cause dovecot to
perform this and that action yourself. The possible actions are, in general,
documented.
I cannot determine how deliver with an empty string give
On 01/06/2010 14:42, Phil Howard wrote:
I see no documents in the Dovecot documents wiki on how Dovecot
features can be used in the fight against spam. One hit came up in a
search, and it was about how to fight spam in the MoinMoin Wiki itself
(e.g. TextCHAs and such).
I already asked in
Well, I can't reproduce this in a normal way. But by changing the code I
managed to cause it. Does this fix it also for you?
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/941608f8b3fb
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Well, I can't reproduce this in a normal way. But by changing the code I
managed to cause it. Does this fix it also for you?
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/941608f8b3fb
I've installed the patch. I'll let you know how it goes.
--
Mark Sapiro m...@msapiro.net
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:01, William Blunn bill+dove...@blunn.org wrote:
Get your anti-spam software to add header records to the messages, then use
Dovecot LDA Sieve to filter based on those header records.
So I can run Sieve as part of the deliver? Or does it run soon after that?
Phil Howard put forth on 6/1/2010 9:15 AM:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 10:04, Jerry dovecot.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
The fight against SPAM is NOT Dovecots responsibility.
Whose responsibility is it to get detected spam delivered into the
correct folder? Dovecot deliver is typically used to
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:17, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Phil Howard put forth on 6/1/2010 9:15 AM:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 10:04, Jerry dovecot.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
The fight against SPAM is NOT Dovecots responsibility.
Whose responsibility is it to get detected spam
Phil Howard put forth on 6/1/2010 11:25 AM:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:17, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Phil Howard put forth on 6/1/2010 9:15 AM:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 10:04, Jerry dovecot.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
The fight against SPAM is NOT Dovecots responsibility.
Whose
On 01/06/2010 17:05, Phil Howard wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:01, William Blunnbill+dove...@blunn.org wrote:
Get your anti-spam software to add header records to the messages, then use
Dovecot LDA Sieve to filter based on those header records.
So I can run Sieve as part of the
Greetings list!
We've been experiencing an intermittent issue in which none users are able to
log into the mail server for about 10 to 20 minutes.
This issue first appeared on our CentOS 4 box running dovecot 1.2.11 after
upgrading from the stock version 0.99. The issue persists after
Is there à GUI for sieve.
I don't have installed Squrielmail, but won't like to manage the
Rules per ssh
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:55, William Blunn bill+dove...@blunn.org wrote:
The Dovecot Sieve plugin provides mail filtering facilities at time of
final message delivery using the Sieve (RFC 5228
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5228.txt) language.
Sieve is implemented as a plugin to deliver
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:41, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Law firm or heavily FED GOV regulated industry? Or just HUA (head up ass)
management with zero understanding of email and spam?
People dealing with a large variety of outside clients and potential
clients where bouncing
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 13:07, Gerhard Waldemair gerh...@waldemair.com wrote:
Is there à GUI for sieve.
I don't have installed Squrielmail, but won't like to manage the Rules per
ssh
I would hope there would be a way to put Sieve scripts in place via
IMAP itself. Otherwise I won't be able to
On 6/1/10 10:24 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 13:07, Gerhard Waldemair gerh...@waldemair.com wrote:
Is there à GUI for sieve.
I don't have installed Squrielmail, but won't like to manage the Rules per
ssh
I would hope there would be a way to put Sieve scripts in place via
On 01/06/2010 18:07, Gerhard Waldemair wrote:
Is there à GUI for sieve.
I don't have installed Squrielmail, but won't like to manage the
Rules per ssh
I have never used it myself, but there would appear to be some useful
things here:
A thingy for Dovecot which should allow Sieve
On 01.06.2010 19:24, wrote Phil Howard:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 13:07, Gerhard Waldemair gerh...@waldemair.com wrote:
Is there à GUI for sieve.
I don't have installed Squrielmail, but won't like to manage the Rules per
ssh
I would hope there would be a way to put Sieve scripts in place via
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:58, Del Stoliker dstoli...@alphagraphics.com wrote:
It almost sounds like the firewall is blocking external access except that:
* The version of dovecot was the thing that changed
* Everything starts working again after a dovecot restart
It sounds like the firewall
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 13:42, e-frog e-f...@gmx.de wrote:
This might be helpful:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/ManageSieve/
Right now only time for a quick look. Looks like yet another server
with yet another protocol (via port 4190), rather than integrated into
IMAP as an extension. I'm
On 6/1/10 2:10 PM -0400 Phil Howard wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 13:42, e-frog e-f...@gmx.de wrote:
This might be helpful:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/ManageSieve/
Right now only time for a quick look. Looks like yet another server
with yet another protocol (via port 4190), rather than
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 14:45, Frank Cusack
frank+lists/dove...@linetwo.net wrote:
On 6/1/10 2:10 PM -0400 Phil Howard wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 13:42, e-frog e-f...@gmx.de wrote:
This might be helpful:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/ManageSieve/
Right now only time for a quick look. Looks
I hadn't gotten to reading much about Sieve, yet, as what I had read
said it was something IMAP users would run.
Man oh man. You don't have much experience with mail and it sounds
like you are starting from scratch. You have your work cut out for
you. :)
The standard way to filter spam is
On 6/1/10 2:55 PM -0400 Phil Howard wrote:
mean time, I just need a short term solution to divert tagged-as-spam
messages into the INBOX-spam (or something like that) folder. I'll
probably just go ahead and write a shim program in C (as easy for me
as a script is for others) to check for the
On ti, 2010-06-01 at 12:02 -0700, Frank Cusack wrote:
deliver -m is implemented via sieve anyway.
No. You can use deliver -m without having Sieve installed at all.
I would like to setup dovecot (1.1.20) with LDAP virtual users,
but I don't seem to understand how to get my sendmail to accept
mail for the virtual users.
(I am rather new to this, so I may have some misunderstandings)
I have followed - wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/DovecotOpenLdap
(OpenLDAP 2.3.43)
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 04:03:10PM +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Well, I can't reproduce this in a normal way. But by changing the code I
managed to cause it. Does this fix it also for you?
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/941608f8b3fb
Yeah, that was it! Thanks, Timo.
Greetings
Juergen
On 6/1/10 8:10 PM +0100 Timo Sirainen wrote:
On ti, 2010-06-01 at 12:02 -0700, Frank Cusack wrote:
deliver -m is implemented via sieve anyway.
No. You can use deliver -m without having Sieve installed at all.
That's not how Stephan (?) explained the interaction of -m and sieve
filters to
On to, 2010-05-20 at 15:48 +0400, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
On 20.05.2010 15:41, Timo Sirainen wrote:
list_specialuse = \Trash:Trash \Sent:Sent Messages etc.
Quoting is annoying.
Hmm, maybe use predefined order of folders? In this case quoting will be
used where it necessary
On ti, 2010-06-01 at 12:22 -0700, Frank Cusack wrote:
On 6/1/10 8:10 PM +0100 Timo Sirainen wrote:
On ti, 2010-06-01 at 12:02 -0700, Frank Cusack wrote:
deliver -m is implemented via sieve anyway.
No. You can use deliver -m without having Sieve installed at all.
That's not how
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 09:42:18 -0400
Von: Phil Howard ttip...@gmail.com
An: Dovecot Mailing List dovecot@dovecot.org
Betreff: [Dovecot] Dovecot aspects of fighting spam
I see no documents in the Dovecot documents wiki on how Dovecot
features can be
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 14:56, Frank Cusack
frank+lists/dove...@linetwo.net wrote:
Man oh man. You don't have much experience with mail and it sounds
like you are starting from scratch. You have your work cut out for
you. :)
Well, actually I do. A lot of it is way way back there with
Hi,
not sure which change caused it, but one of the latest adds between those two
snapshots breaks userdb lookup:
Jun 1 21:53:30 spectre dovecot: master: Dovecot v2.0.beta5 (1b45f9641924)
starting up
Jun 1 21:53:30 spectre dovecot: master: Warning: Killed with signal 15 (by
pid=6898 uid=0
On 2010-06-01 3:56 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
Since sieve looks like it will be a problem right now, until I get a
solution to that, I'm seriously considering this solution. A shim
program I write in C will be run from Postfix master.cf just as
Dovecot deliver is now.
I'm trying to figure out
On ti, 2010-06-01 at 22:02 +0200, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
Jun 1 21:52:30 spectre dovecot: master: Error: service(auth): child 6797
killed with signal 11 (core not dumped)
Could you get gdb backtrace? http://dovecot.org/bugreport.html#coredumps
On 01.06.2010 23:23, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On to, 2010-05-20 at 15:48 +0400, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
On 20.05.2010 15:41, Timo Sirainen wrote:
list_specialuse = \Trash:Trash \Sent:Sent Messages etc.
Quoting is annoying.
Hmm, maybe use predefined order of folders? In this case quoting will be
On 01/06/2010 20:56, Phil Howard wrote:
Since sieve looks like it will be a problem right now, until I get a
solution to that, I'm seriously considering this solution. A shim
program I write in C will be run from Postfix master.cf just as
Dovecot deliver is now. I'd basically change the
On 6/1/10 3:56 PM -0400 Phil Howard wrote:
Since sieve looks like it will be a problem right now, until I get a
solution to that, I'm seriously considering this solution. A shim
program I write in C will be run from Postfix master.cf just as
...
you are just making it harder than it has to
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 10:09:19 -0400
Phil Howard ttip...@gmail.com articulated:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 09:56, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2010-06-01 8:39 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 17:30, Charles Marcus wrote:
Of course it is meant for people, but
On 06/01/2010 02:04 PM Henrique Fernandes wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 6:17 AM, Greg Pearson deejay@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am using Dovecot with mbox format, and I am interested to move to
Maildir. I have run the modified script (mb2md) but it seems UIDs are not
preserved. I don't know
On 06/01/2010 10:02 PM Thomas Leuxner wrote:
== /var/log/dovecot.log ==
Jun 1 21:52:30 spectre dovecot: lmtp(6788): Connect from local
Jun 1 21:52:30 spectre dovecot: master: Error: service(auth): child 6797
killed with signal 11 (core not dumped)
Jun 1 21:52:30 spectre dovecot:
61 matches
Mail list logo
