Re: [Dovecot] Sieve GUI

2010-06-02 Thread Rainer Frey
On Tuesday 01 June 2010 20:10:08 Phil Howard wrote: Looks like I will need to do a lot of reading on Sieve and ManageSieve to be sure it's safe. For one thing, I want to turn the vacation feature off unless it can cross check a list of valid senders (user contacts). No need to turn it off.

Re: [Dovecot] configuring sendmail to work with dovecot+LDAP

2010-06-02 Thread Andrzej Adam Filip
Douglas Maus dm...@speakeasy.net wrote: I would like to setup dovecot (1.1.20) with LDAP virtual users, but I don't seem to understand how to get my sendmail to accept mail for the virtual users. (I am rather new to this, so I may have some misunderstandings) I have followed -

Re: [Dovecot] Sieve GUI

2010-06-02 Thread Rainer Frey
On Tuesday 01 June 2010 20:55:52 Phil Howard wrote: frank+lists/dove...@linetwo.net wrote: On 6/1/10 2:10 PM -0400 Phil Howard wrote: On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 13:42, e-frog e-f...@gmx.de wrote: This might be helpful: http://wiki.dovecot.org/ManageSieve/ Right now only time for a

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot aspects of fighting spam

2010-06-02 Thread Rainer Frey
On Tuesday 01 June 2010 17:01:16 Phil Howard wrote: On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 10:45, Rainer Frey rainer.f...@inxmail.de wrote: I guess you'll have the mental transfer of fight spam into cause dovecot to perform this and that action yourself. The possible actions are, in general, documented.

Re: [Dovecot] Sieve GUI

2010-06-02 Thread Marcio Merlone
Em 01-06-2010 15:45, Frank Cusack escreveu: (...)you are right in that almost no clients support it. Mulberry and thunderbird are the only ones I know of. Are you talking about the extension on wich you have to write the sieve scripts by hand? That is a joke, hope someone creates a decent

Re: [Dovecot] Sieve GUI

2010-06-02 Thread Gerhard Waldemair
Am 02.06.2010 um 13:23 schrieb Marcio Merlone: Em 01-06-2010 15:45, Frank Cusack escreveu: (...)you are right in that almost no clients support it. Mulberry and thunderbird are the only ones I know of. Are you talking about the extension on wich you have to write the sieve scripts by

Re: [Dovecot] Sieve GUI

2010-06-02 Thread Anton Dollmaier
Hi, has someone tried this or knows something similar ? RoundCube in version 0.3 and later supports a plugin system and provides actually two different Sieve-plugins, one out of the box, the other one is available here: http://www.tehinterweb.co.uk/roundcube/#pisieverules both work and

Re: [Dovecot] Sieve GUI

2010-06-02 Thread Wolfgang . Friebel
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Anton Dollmaier wrote: Hi, has someone tried this or knows something similar ? RoundCube in version 0.3 and later supports a plugin system and provides actually two different Sieve-plugins, one out of the box, the other one is available here:

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot install problem

2010-06-02 Thread David Schornak
You really should upgrade, especially if you're just starting out... 1.0.7 is really, really really old, current is 1.2.11, and 2.0 is now in beta - way too many improvements to go into, just do it. ok let me ask this question how do I upgrade if when I do a yum upgrade there is no

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot aspects of fighting spam

2010-06-02 Thread Phil Howard
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 02:39, Rainer Frey rainer.f...@inxmail.de wrote: On Tuesday 01 June 2010 17:01:16 Phil Howard wrote: I cannot determine how deliver with an empty string give to -m would behave. This is just what I mean: the behavior of deliver -m has absolutely nothing to do with

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot aspects of fighting spam

2010-06-02 Thread Tom Hendrikx
On 02/06/10 14:59, Phil Howard wrote: On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 02:39, Rainer Frey rainer.f...@inxmail.de wrote: On Tuesday 01 June 2010 17:01:16 Phil Howard wrote: I cannot determine how deliver with an empty string give to -m would behave. This is just what I mean: the behavior of deliver

Re: [Dovecot] Sieve GUI

2010-06-02 Thread Andy Dills
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Gerhard Waldemair wrote: Am 02.06.2010 um 13:23 schrieb Marcio Merlone: Em 01-06-2010 15:45, Frank Cusack escreveu: (...)you are right in that almost no clients support it. Mulberry and thunderbird are the only ones I know of. Are you talking about the

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot v2.0.beta5 (1b45f9641924): Auth Crashes

2010-06-02 Thread Thomas Leuxner
Am 02.06.2010 um 02:35 schrieb Pascal Volk: Try this: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/dc94f9240ec1 I can confirm that above patch mitigates the situation. Would it still help if I'd debug the crash or has the source been tracked down? Thomas

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot v2.0.beta5 (1b45f9641924): Auth Crashes

2010-06-02 Thread Pascal Volk
On 06/02/2010 07:14 PM Thomas Leuxner wrote: I can confirm that above patch mitigates the situation. Would it still help if I'd debug the crash or has the source been tracked down? huh, didn't it solve your problem completely? Crashes the auth process still when your lmtp performs a userdb

Re: [Dovecot] A new director service in v2.0 for NFS installations

2010-06-02 Thread Timo Sirainen
On ma, 2010-05-31 at 19:09 -0700, Brandon Davidson wrote: Timo, On 5/31/10 6:56 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote: Oh, you're right. For auth settings currently only protocol blocks work. It was a bit too much trouble to make local/remote blocks to work. :) That's too bad! Any hope

Re: [Dovecot] master users with dovecot2 braek down to allowed domain

2010-06-02 Thread Timo Sirainen
On ma, 2010-05-31 at 10:40 +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote: if i use the postfixadmin superuser,domainadmin,domainuser layout so there are domainadmins defined in a sql table it would be a nice feature to break it down to be master only at there related domains via sql lookup at recent i think

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot v2.0.beta5 (1b45f9641924): Auth Crashes

2010-06-02 Thread Thomas Leuxner
Am 02.06.2010 um 19:39 schrieb Pascal Volk: huh, didn't it solve your problem completely? Crashes the auth process still when your lmtp performs a userdb lookup? No it doesn't crash anymore, but it sounded like the commit you listed was reverting a partial fix, hence I considered it a

Re: [Dovecot] Problems with the IMAP proxy after upgrading from dovecot 1.1.16 to 1.211

2010-06-02 Thread Timo Sirainen
On pe, 2010-05-07 at 15:35 +0200, Holger Richter wrote: May 7 14:47:42 ttt dovecot: auth(default): worker-server(uid,yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy): Aborted: Lookup timed out May 7 14:47:42 ttt dovecot: auth-worker(default): mysql: Connected to lll.lll.lll.lll (imapauth) Lookup timed out really

Re: [Dovecot] returned error 83 (Out of memory)

2010-06-02 Thread Timo Sirainen
On to, 2010-04-22 at 13:03 +1000, J Contad wrote: Hello! I've setup dovecot a few months ago, and it was working pretty swimmingly. Then, out of nowhere, we started getting this error: Apr 21 19:15:17 IMAP(x...@xxx.com): Fatal: block_alloc(1073741824): Out of memory .. The folder (which

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot aspects of fighting spam

2010-06-02 Thread Phil Howard
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:20, Tom Hendrikx t...@whyscream.net wrote: Did you even try to set this up in your test environment (you have one, don't you?) to explore your own capabilities in finding out the behaviour of this edge case? It sounds trivial to do, but you cannot expect other list

[Dovecot] 'doveadm who' enhancement request

2010-06-02 Thread Brad Davidson
When Dovecot is in proxy mode, the client sends along the original connection endpoints in an ID command. Is there any chance 'doveadm who' could use this to display the original connection source? As it currently stands, all I see is a bunch of connections from the proxy. Thanks! --- Brandon

Re: [Dovecot] 'doveadm who' enhancement request

2010-06-02 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 2.6.2010, at 23.34, Brad Davidson wrote: When Dovecot is in proxy mode, the client sends along the original connection endpoints in an ID command. Is there any chance 'doveadm who' could use this to display the original connection source? As it currently stands, all I see is a bunch of

Re: [Dovecot] 'doveadm who' enhancement request

2010-06-02 Thread Brad Davidson
Timo, Is there any chance 'doveadm who' could use this to display the original connection source? If login_trusted_networks contains proxies, I think it should already do that?.. Interesting. I'd tried putting the private network in login_trusted_networks but it got stuck in a loop until

Re: [Dovecot] 'doveadm who' enhancement request

2010-06-02 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 3.6.2010, at 1.20, Brad Davidson wrote: Interesting. I'd tried putting the private network in login_trusted_networks but it got stuck in a loop until the director process ran out of file handles, so I took it back out. This is probably a little weird in that it's proxying to itself, and

Re: [Dovecot] 'doveadm who' enhancement request

2010-06-02 Thread Brad Davidson
-Original Message- From: Timo Sirainen [mailto:t...@iki.fi] .. password_query = SELECT null AS password, 'Y' AS nopassword, 'Y' AS proxy WHERE '%{lip}' NOT LIKE '10.142.0.%%' AND '%{lip}' != '%{rip}' This query no longer works, because both lip and rip are replaced with the

[Dovecot] dovecot transaction log permissions

2010-06-02 Thread Jordan Tardif
So after some problems with NFS and transaction logs getting corrupted. Im tyring out storing them localy. via.. mail_location: maildir:~/Maildir:INDEX=/var/dovecot/indexes/%u the problem is with a large amount of users.. the indexes dir becomes huge with this setup. So a change to make

Re: [Dovecot] 'doveadm who' enhancement request

2010-06-02 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 3.6.2010, at 1.46, Brad Davidson wrote: I know I'm trying to shoehorn the director into an infrastructure it's not really meant for. A better choice would probably be to bring a new dedicated director online in either location, and put those behind the load balancer. I wonder if they can

Re: [Dovecot] 'doveadm who' enhancement request

2010-06-02 Thread Brandon Davidson
On 6/2/10 7:33 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote: I wonder if they can stand up to 10k+ concurrent proxied connections though? I'd think so. I could probably give that a try, but I'll have a hard time convincing folks to do that until after 2.0 has out of beta for a bit. Maybe after summer

Re: [Dovecot] userdb prefetch not compatible with ssl_require_client_cert

2010-06-02 Thread zhong ming wu
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote: On Sun, 2010-03-21 at 16:34 -0400, zhong ming wu wrote: I looked into docs but couldn't see any where that says of this incompatibility. Anywhere this is confirmed in the doc? Why wouldn't it be?.. I had tested it at the

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot v2.0.beta5 (1b45f9641924): Auth Crashes

2010-06-02 Thread Pascal Volk
On 06/02/2010 07:39 PM Pascal Volk wrote: The 'fix', which made auth crashing, was intended to solve another issue. But the other issue should be also fixed with that commit: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/1e890076c4e9 Hm, seems not be fixed. Now my installation is up to date (2.0.beta5