Sigh,
In the interest of moving forward on this project I've given up trying to
get Dovecot to support mailboxes, rather I've tweaked around in qmail and
had it deliver into a mail directory on a disk, that isn't NFS mounted. That
got me past the various locking complaints and operation not
So if I want to run dovecot from tcpserver it seems like I can simply run
`pop3-login --ssl` from tcpserver (its sort of like running it from inetd)
and it says it will 'talk to dovecot'. Can I disable all listeners in
dovecot then? Will is still talk to it? Trying some experiments now ...
Is there anyone using Apple´s Mail.app to collect the mails via IMAP or IMAPS ?
I found a funny bug in Debian Lennys Dovecot Version. (still v. 1.0.15)
When I get my Mails via IMAP or IMAPS and define a Rule in Mail.app to move the
eMail to s specific folder I will find the mail 2 times in the
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:59:55PM -0700, Chuck McManis wrote:
In the interest of moving forward on this project
I looked back at your other thread and at this one, and, hmmm. I
invite you to join us in the new millennium.
1. POP3 sucks.
IMAP can do everything POP3 can do, and many things
Am 15.06.2010 13:11, schrieb Bodo Schulz:
Hello (and Moin Moin) ;)
I have currently a straith Problem ...
[...]
I have yesterday compile a old Thunderbird2 Version.
This Version (2.0.0.23) works perfectly.
It is also an Bug in the used Thunderbird3 Version (3.0.4).
Thanks a lot for your
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 09:18:45AM +0200, Gerhard Waldemair wrote:
Is there anyone using Apple´s Mail.app to collect the mails via IMAP or IMAPS
?
I found a funny bug in Debian Lennys Dovecot Version. (still v. 1.0.15)
[...]
Now I have updatet Dovecot from 1.0 to 1.2 from Backports and
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:20 AM, /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:59:55PM -0700, Chuck McManis wrote:
In the interest of moving forward on this project
I looked back at your other thread and at this one, and, hmmm. I
invite you to join us in the new millennium.
On 17/06/2010 09:46, Chuck McManis wrote:
Out of curiosity, lets say you were given the task I've set for myself
which
is described thusly:
Provide a system that gives shell and email service to a dozen users, hosts
perhaps 15 or so mailing lists, provides DNS for 20 - 30 machines.
Preferred
Chuck McManis wrote:
Out of curiosity, lets say you were given the task I've set for myself which is
described thusly:
Provide a system that gives shell and email service to a dozen users, hosts
perhaps 15 or so mailing lists, provides DNS for 20 - 30 machines.
Preferred OS and what makes it
G'Day,
I am trying to find a definitive answer to what the directory
permissions should be for my configuration under Centos 5.5. I see a
number of the following error messages in the maillog as a consequence
of permissions errors. After reading the FAQ, Wiki etc. and browsing the
web I am
Hello
Does anyone knows if it is possible to manage a personnal address book
with Dovecot and IMAP ?
I mean would it be possible to store it in the IMAP user's space
and not in the MUA address book in order to always retrieve it
even changing on machine / MUA ?
Thanks
G'Day,
LDA = Local Delivery Agent? Postfix is the MTA with Dovecot providing
POP3 and IMAP.
On 17/06/2010 9:35 PM, Daniel Petre wrote:
hello,
is your dovecot supposed to act as a LDA ?
G'Day,
I am trying to find a definitive answer to what the directory
permissions should be for my
G'Day,
LDA = Local Delivery Agent? Postfix is the MTA with Dovecot
providing POP3 and IMAP.
okay then, shouldnt dovecot have rw acces to the folders the mail is
delivered by postfix under the user that MTA runs?
On 17/06/2010 9:35 PM, Daniel Petre wrote:
hello,
is your dovecot
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 09:52:46PM +1000, Donovan J. Edye wrote:
G'Day,
LDA = Local Delivery Agent? Postfix is the MTA with Dovecot providing
POP3 and IMAP.
Have a look at this Dovecot variable mail_privileged_group = mail
http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/mbox
Generally speaking it
On 17/06/2010 12:19, William Blunn wrote:
Rent a virtual machine (e.g. Xen based). This saves you having to make
capital expenditure on hardware (= keeps the bean counter happy).
I haven't found virtual machines to be especially price efficient when
you need plenty of storage available? Do
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 02:11:44PM +0200, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
Generally speaking it needs to match the group that Postfix uses when
writing the mbox file. Besides this your Dovecot version is really old and
almost guarantees other issues arising.
Regards
Thomas
My bad, you said maildir.
Am 17.06.2010 13:31, schrieb Frank Bonnet:
Hello
Does anyone knows if it is possible to manage a personnal address book
with Dovecot and IMAP ?
I mean would it be possible to store it in the IMAP user's space
and not in the MUA address book in order to always retrieve it
even changing
Em 17-06-2010 08:31, Frank Bonnet escreveu:
Does anyone knows if it is possible to manage a personnal address book
with Dovecot and IMAP ?
I mean would it be possible to store it in the IMAP user's space
and not in the MUA address book in order to always retrieve it
even changing on machine /
On 06/17/2010 02:20 PM, Marcio Merlone wrote:
Em 17-06-2010 08:31, Frank Bonnet escreveu:
Does anyone knows if it is possible to manage a personnal address book
with Dovecot and IMAP ?
I mean would it be possible to store it in the IMAP user's space
and not in the MUA address book in order to
On 06/17/2010 02:19 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 17.06.2010 13:31, schrieb Frank Bonnet:
Hello
Does anyone knows if it is possible to manage a personnal address book
with Dovecot and IMAP ?
I mean would it be possible to store it in the IMAP user's space
and not in the MUA address book in
Em 17-06-2010 09:23, Frank Bonnet escreveu:
On 06/17/2010 02:20 PM, Marcio Merlone wrote:
Em 17-06-2010 08:31, Frank Bonnet escreveu:
Does anyone knows if it is possible to manage a personnal address book
with Dovecot and IMAP ?
I mean would it be possible to store it in the IMAP user's space
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Pascal Volk
user+dove...@localhost.localdomain.orguser%2bdove...@localhost.localdomain.org
wrote:
On 06/15/2010 03:40 PM Tseveendorj Ochirlantuu wrote:
Dear Pascal
Sorry for forgetting required thing. Please see the dovecot -n follow
# 1.2.9:
Ed W wrote:
How are you backing up to S3? Most of the options I have seen have
some serious issues that limit reliable full backups? Its been on my
todo list for some time now to fix the C s3fs implementation that you
find here: http://code.google.com/p/s3fs/ - code is shocking and could
On 17/06/10 13:33, William Blunn wrote:
Ed W wrote:
How are you backing up to S3? Most of the options I have seen have
some serious issues that limit reliable full backups? Its been on my
todo list for some time now to fix the C s3fs implementation that you
find here:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:23:16PM -0400, Dillon Kass wrote:
I quit using mmap_disable around 7.1-STABLE and haven't had that bug since
then. I'm running 8.0-R with Maildirs in a compressed ZFS dataset right now
with no problems. That's pretty odd...I'm pretty sure it was in the
Peter Risdon wrote:
Tarsnap is worth glancing at:
http://www.tarsnap.com/
They appear to use S3 as their back-end :-)
They charge $0.30 / GB.month compared to $0.15 / GB.month for S3, which
would seem to be within the bounds of reason if they are effectively
mapping S3 space into something
On 17/06/10 14:11, William Blunn wrote:
Peter Risdon wrote:
Tarsnap is worth glancing at:
http://www.tarsnap.com/
They appear to use S3 as their back-end :-)
That's right, thought it might be relevant. It's written by Colin
Percival, FreeBSD's security officer.
They charge $0.30 /
I just downloaded 1.2.11 and compiled from source including mysql support
and using default directory locations.
I walked thru the included example conf file and tweaked it out and get an
invalid configuration file.
I trimmed out all of the commented sections to make the non-default config
Hello list,
I'm implementing shared mailboxes on live system and after enabling acl plugin
I got errors in my log:
Jun 17 15:50:33 dict: Error: sql dict iterate: Invalid/unmapped path:
shared/shared-boxes/anyone/
I have no clue why this happening, users don't know about new functionality
On 06/17/2010 02:32 PM Tseveendorj Ochirlantuu wrote:
disable_plaintext_auth is already set yes in
/etc/dovecot/conf.d/01-dovecot-postfix.conf. why it didn't appear.
Today I just upgraded dovecot please see the dovecot -n below.
# 1.2.9: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux
On 06/17/2010 03:27 PM Justin Krejci wrote:
…
auth_username_chars =
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ01234567890.-_@/$!\
…
Any ideas what is wrong here? It seems like the example conf file is not
correct. Yes the dovecot-sql.conf file exists.
The above line (with
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 14:55 +0200, Philippe Chevalier wrote:
Jun 08 15:01:24 IMAP(): Error: close(client out) failed:
Connection reset by peer
I've seen this a FEW times. Like 3 in the last six months. seems to have
gone away after updating to 1.2..though maybe I just haven't
LOL nice!
Thanks for being gentle.
-Original Message-
From: dovecot-bounces+jkrejci=usinternet@dovecot.org
[mailto:dovecot-bounces+jkrejci=usinternet@dovecot.org] On Behalf Of
Pascal Volk
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 8:45 AM
To: Dovecot Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Dovecot]
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 16:25 +0300, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
Jun 17 15:50:33 dict: Error: sql dict iterate: Invalid/unmapped path:
shared/shared-boxes/anyone/
I think the wiki sql configuration was written/tested by someone who got
the same errors, but ignored them.. You need to provide also a
On 2010-06-17 7:31 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Does anyone knows if it is possible to manage a personnal address book
with Dovecot and IMAP ?
I mean would it be possible to store it in the IMAP user's space
and not in the MUA address book in order to always retrieve it
even changing on machine
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:57:08 +0100
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 16:25 +0300, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
Jun 17 15:50:33 dict: Error: sql dict iterate: Invalid/unmapped path:
shared/shared-boxes/anyone/
I think the wiki sql configuration was written/tested by someone who got
Hello,
I like to share the inbox INBOX itself to other users and not only
folders.
But it looks like INBOX is not shareable? I have tried both dbox and
maildir.
I have used TB, SquirrelMail, Roundcube. TB shoes the shared INBOX
within the subscription dialog as subscripted but the per user
Thanks Timo.
--Chuck
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 17.6.2010, at 6.59, Chuck McManis wrote:
First, part of this effort was to move off of an APOP infrastructure into
something more secure against password eavesdropping. To that end I've
configured
Thanks for the response, some snippage to cut down on list traffic ...
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 7:14 AM, /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:20 AM, /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
2a. mutt and alpine are both Unix console-based MUAs which
understand
On 2010-06-17 11:52 AM, Chuck McManis wrote:
but I've been evaluating a ZFS based file server as well to see if it
can get the same level of reliability.
Care to share which one? Or just a FreeBSD based one of your own making?
I've been considering NexentaStor Comunity Edition. The boss
Spammers are working every day to cause more abuse. Postmasters are
trying to stay ahead of them, but we still see that over 90% of all
traffic to port 25/tcp is abuse.
Hmm, I would rather estimate it to around 99% on our multi-domain
mailserver, including the connections we deny at the
On Jun 17, 2010, at 1:45 PM, Martijn de Munnik wrote:
Hi List,
I'm trying to make dovecot deliver messages to sam+extens...@example.com
to the imap folder 'extension' of the user 'sam'. I've configured
postfix with these dovecot as LDA:
mailbox_command =
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.comwrote:
On 2010-06-17 11:52 AM, Chuck McManis wrote:
but I've been evaluating a ZFS based file server as well to see if it
can get the same level of reliability.
Care to share which one? Or just a FreeBSD based one of
On 2010-06-17 3:33 PM, Chuck McManis wrote:
Its just a FreeBSD 8.0 system with a Marvell 8 port SATA card and a couple
of TB of of SATA drives.
Thanks for the response... now I just have to find the time... ;)
--
Best regards,
Charles
I already replied to Matthias on IRC, but here's for everyone:
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 21:33 +0200, Matthias Rieber wrote:
a LIST virtual.spam. *
* LIST (\Noselect \HasNoChildren) . virtual.spam.
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) . virtual.spam.unchecked
This \HasNoChildren was already fixed in v2.0. I
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 04:46, Chuck McManis chuck.mcma...@gmail.com wrote:
So SMTP hasn't changed much in 30 years ;-) I'd be interested in what you
consider a 'modern' MTA. I've looked pretty thoroughly at sendmail, postfix,
and qmail and of the three qmail is fairly reliable. Not sure what
On Jun 17, 2010, at 9:25 PM, Martijn de Munnik wrote:
On Jun 17, 2010, at 1:45 PM, Martijn de Munnik wrote:
Hi List,
I'm trying to make dovecot deliver messages to sam+extens...@example.com
to the imap folder 'extension' of the user 'sam'. I've configured
postfix with these dovecot as
re-sent , this never made it to the list, my anti spam system ate it :)
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 07:07 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
That's an interesting position/observation given that RHEL, SLES, and CentOS
(RHEL derivative) have the largest datacenter footprint in the US by far.
Across
Mark Sapiro wrote:
The initial problem I was seeing after upgrade from 2.0beta5 to
2.0beta6 was error messages from my Android phone K9 client that
dovecot was reporting -1 messages in various mailboxes. These
mailboxes do have the special Mail System Internal Data message in
them.
Just to
49 matches
Mail list logo
