Timo Sirainen tss at iki.fi writes:
On 26.10.2010, at 9.38, Xiiph wrote:
In order to avoid flooding I uploaded the gdb backtrace.
You can find it here: http://bit.ly/9WqDkM
That looks exactly like the problem that was fixed in 2.0.6. I don't think
you're using 2.0.6's
dovecot-lda.
W dniu 2010-10-14 17:53, Timo Sirainen pisze:
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 11:22 +0200, Len7hir wrote:
This is scenario that cause segmentation fault in my Dovecot.
Thanks, fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/a3e40c6b14fe
This fix is not working property.
Now I have this in logs:
465354
Hi!
Could you tell me what is wrong with an existence of mailbox?
Please see the two examples:
. list *
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) / Trash
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) / Junk
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) / Sent
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) / Drafts
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) / Archives
* LIST
Dear All,
I am using the latest version of doveot-2.0.6 and using
dovecot-lda to deliver mail in to Maildir. I have successfully
implemented the global quota as well as per user quota using ldap for
storing per user quota. Now i am trying to send warning message when
user exceed
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 23:52 -0200, Andre Nathan wrote:
They're not happening all the time. It showed up two or three times in
the logs during the night.
A few errors of this kind appeared in the logs last night. The Log
synchronization error appears more frequently than Corrupted
transaction
Does anyone have clients using blackberrys to access their emails on a
dovecot server? If so are there any gotcha's that I need to configure
in dovecot for this to work? Looks like all emails go to and from a
blackberry server before getting to clients.
thanks,
ddh
--
Dwayne Hottinger
On 10/27/2010 8:17 AM, dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote:
Does anyone have clients using blackberrys to access their emails on a
dovecot server? If so are there any gotcha's that I need to configure
in dovecot for this to work? Looks like all emails go to and from a
blackberry server
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 23:52 -0200, Andre Nathan wrote:
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 22:39 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Have you set mmap_disable=yes?
Yep.
Just out of curiosity, is this setting really needed, or is it for
performance reasons? OCFS2 claims to support mmap:
W dniu 20.10.2010 16:35, Timo Sirainen pisze:
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 16:11 +0200, Marek Miska wrote:
On Dovecot 1.2.x it is possible to run multiple auth daemons.
Is it possible on dovecot 2.0.x ?
Not really..
Any plan to support it in future?
Or at least multiple LDAP connections from one
There is a BES that works with IMAP.
You can also get a 'real' Java IMAP client for blackberry -
http://www.logicprobe.org/proj/logicmail
Rick
Quoting Donny Brooks dbro...@mdah.state.ms.us:
On 10/27/2010 8:17 AM, dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote:
Does anyone have clients using
On 27.10.2010, at 15.47, Marek Miska wrote:
On Dovecot 1.2.x it is possible to run multiple auth daemons.
Is it possible on dovecot 2.0.x ?
Not really..
Any plan to support it in future?
Maybe, but it's not simple.
Or at least multiple LDAP connections from one auth process?
That's
On 27.10.2010, at 15.48, Andre Nathan wrote:
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 23:52 -0200, Andre Nathan wrote:
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 22:39 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Have you set mmap_disable=yes?
Yep.
Just out of curiosity, is this setting really needed, or is it for
performance reasons? OCFS2
I use, spamassassin, postfix , mailscanner, dovecot
before i use postgrey, but it was giving to many problens because we scaled
for many host.
I am loking for sqlgrey now to test it.
[]'sf.rique
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Robert M. Münch
robert.mue...@saphirion.com wrote:
-BEGIN
Hi list,
can someone please explain me the following behaviour of deliver in
combination with fs-quota and reading from stdin:
# repquota -a | grep ud_3p5
ud_3p5--4464 10240 12288 10 0 0
# stat -c %s /tmp/mymail
4524853
so there's enough space for this mail
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 12:24 -0700, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
Alan Brown wrote:
ATrpms has builds too, but they're usually out of date.
Yeah way of of date. 1.0.7 I think is what I saw.
Hm, ATrpms is usually shipping packages within a few days after a
release as well as packages of beta
On 10/27/2010 12:06 PM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Le 27/10/2010 15:21, Donny Brooks a écrit :
On 10/27/2010 8:17 AM, dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote:
Does anyone have clients using blackberrys to access their emails on a
dovecot server? If so are there any gotcha's that I need to configure
Hi Juan,
sorry for the late reply I just picked this up mentioning ATrpms:
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 19:05 +0200, Juan C. Blanco wrote:
Hello Stephan I have some problems to build pigeonhole 0.2.1 over dovect
2.0.5, I've had no problems with previous versions; the system is CentOS
5.5.
FWIW
Dr Matthew Williams wrote on 10/27/2010:
Hello,
I have been investigating mailbox conversions and have used the convert
plugin under Dovecot V1.x. I cannot find the plugin in the list on the
wiki for Dovcot V2.x, is it not included for a reason?
I understand that I can do a post-login script
On 10/10/19 08:01, Timo Sirainen wrote:
No. The username is sent another way to deliver. Anyway, I think -d
$RECIPIENT is the right way.
Timo,
I modified the mailbox command in /etc/postfix/main.cf:
mailbox_command = /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d ${recipient}
This causes
On 27.10.2010, at 21.11, Camron W. Fox wrote:
mailbox_command = /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d ${recipient}
This causes postfix to bounce the message with this error:
Oct 27 09:06:57 rb8 postfix/local[1931]: A99494E0D25:
to=loadt...@subaru.naoj.org, relay=local, delay=10,
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 12:24 -0700, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
Alan Brown wrote:
ATrpms has builds too, but they're usually out of date.
Yeah way of of date. 1.0.7 I think is what I saw.
Hm, ATrpms is usually shipping packages within a few days after a
release as well as
Here's another one-off crash in dovecot-2.0.3's auth process. Looks like
request-mech == NULL in auth_request_initial(). I don't see any obvious fixes
to this code between 2.0.3 and 2.0.6 so it may still be present in 2.0.6.
Exception Type: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGSEGV)
Exception Codes:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:11:02 -1000
Camron W. Fox cw...@us.fujitsu.com articulated:
On 10/10/19 08:01, Timo Sirainen wrote:
No. The username is sent another way to deliver. Anyway, I think -d
$RECIPIENT is the right way.
Timo,
I modified the mailbox command in
With service imap { client_limit = 5, service_count = 0 }, when the auth
process crashes the existing imap processes cannot reconnect to the auth-master
socket because they have long ago dropped root privileges. Is the right
solution to this:
(1) change the perms on the auth-master socket so
On 27.10.2010, at 22.25, Mike Abbott wrote:
With service imap { client_limit = 5, service_count = 0 },
This still isn't all that recommended, since one connection can hang other
connections in same process.
when the auth process crashes
Which of course shouldn't happen :)
the existing
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 21:49 +0200, wolfgang.frie...@desy.de wrote:
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 17:47 +0200, wolfgang.frie...@desy.de wrote:
Therefore the executable will fail to run:
ldd /usr/libexec/dovecot/managesieve-login
libdovecot-login.so.0 = not found
On 10/10/27 09:56, Jerry wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:11:02 -1000
Camron W. Fox cw...@us.fujitsu.com articulated:
On 10/10/19 08:01, Timo Sirainen wrote:
No. The username is sent another way to deliver. Anyway, I think -d
$RECIPIENT is the right way.
Timo,
I modified the mailbox
Is there a way to make quota_rule apply to subfolders? I've got some
symlinked mailboxes which I want to exclude from quotas. This would
work, but is verbose:
quota_rule6 = USERS.aaa:ignore
quota_rule7 = USERS.bbb:ignore
...
quota_rule = USERS.zzz:ignore
But simply writing
I am running dovecot 1.2.12 on Free BSD 8.1. We also have postfix and a version
of squirrelmail for the UI. We are using MySql database to store the email
account info. I wrote a script to insert about 100K users into mysql. Those
accounts seem to work well
and I'm able to see things like
Hello
Few questions regarding Doveadm-Expunge.
1.
I have lazy expunge configure with this name space: .EXPUNGED
Storage type: mdbox
doveadm -Dv expunge -u u...@domain mailbox .EXPUNGED/* savedbefore 7d
I get some interesting outputs.
doveadm(u...@domain): Debug: expunge:
30 matches
Mail list logo
