On 09/27/2011 03:56 PM, Nerijus Kislauskas wrote:
How can we fix this?
Sorry for your disturbance. LDAP replication issue. Everything is
working fine. Thanks for your great job.
--
Pagarbiai,
Nerijus Kislauskas
KTU ITPI, Litnet valdymo centras
Studentu g. 48a - 101, Kaunas
tel.: (8~37) 30 06 45
Sorted out the problem, which was already solved in an older forum post of
dovecot.
In the file
/usr/local/etc/dovecot/conf.d/auth-system.conf.ext
I set
Passdb {
Driver = pam
args = session=yes dovecot
}
Unfortunately this didnt work because when I log in with a user xy, the
user dovecot became
Hello,
I'm moving my mail server from Exchange to an opensource one.
After a bunch of reading, I decided on building a Dovecot2 + Postfix
server in a VirtualUsers-only + Multiple-domains configuration.
Since my messages will be stored by Dovecot, and the documentation is
really good, I figured
On 20/09/2011 03:10, Kui Zhang wrote:
thunderbird does not really work for us, due to amount of emails per
mailbox. It was hogging all the memory + cpu.
I think if you disable the new local indexing features in TB then it
should start running fairly decently?
I don't have mega large inboxes,
On 2011-09-27 2:06 PM, Ed W li...@wildgooses.com wrote:
On 20/09/2011 03:10, Kui Zhang wrote:
thunderbird does not really work for us, due to amount of emails per
mailbox. It was hogging all the memory + cpu.
I think if you disable the new local indexing features in TB then it
should start
Tom Hendrikx wrote:
On 27/09/11 17:51, terryjames9...@mm.st wrote:
Hello,
I'm moving my mail server from Exchange to an opensource one.
After a bunch of reading, I decided on building a Dovecot2 + Postfix
server in a VirtualUsers-only + Multiple-domains configuration.
Since my messages will
On Wed, September 28, 2011 2:51 am, terryjames9...@mm.st wrote:
I'm a little confused about: to do that sharing-in-one-place, do I have
to use SQL or can I use the flatfiles like passwd-db? I think for sure
someone already decided the best approach for this, and maybe I'm not
understanding
On Wed, September 28, 2011 6:47 am, Nick Rosier wrote:
My main concern was losing mails if the DB is unavailable but this isn't
a problem; if the DB is unavailable Postfix will return a temporarily
unavailable and the MTA should retry.
yes, that was also my biggest concern when I 1st looked
I think if you disable the new local indexing features in TB then it
should start running fairly decently?
I had indexing disabled... that did not help much.
TB work better after I have these settings...
mail.imap.expunge_after_delete true
mail.imap.expunge_option 2
Hello Tom,
On Tuesday, September 27, 2011 7:29 PM, Tom Hendrikx
t...@whyscream.net wrote:
The problem with passwd(like) files is that they are almost never in the
correct format to fit both daemons. The easiest way to use a database.
I don't yet see using a database easier than flatfiles. I
For my personal email, I have a habit of having the sql server down
for one reason or another. I just dump the sql tables to flatfiles on
the email server, and a script runs every 15min and checks for updates
if any exist. Works well.
Another method would be to just keep it sql, but dump
Well, the info dovecot needs, it mailbox name/location, username,
password, and quota, misc info.
postfix will need email address to mailbox name mapping info.
That is the very basic things you need.
Using dovecot lda/lmtp you remove all postfix needs to know mailbox
name to directory
Hello Nick,
On Tuesday, September 27, 2011 9:47 PM, Nick Rosier
nick+dove...@bunbun.be wrote:
+1 one on PostfixAdmin. Wouldn't want to live without it. The main
advantage of using a DB is that all information is stored in 1 location
and available in the right format through SQL-queries. My
Hello Patrick,
On Tuesday, September 27, 2011 6:06 PM, Patrick Domack
patric...@patrickdk.com wrote:
Using dovecot lda/lmtp you remove all postfix needs to know mailbox
name to directory mapping, that would be duplicated.
With using the Dovecot lmtp option, where does Postfix know to refuse
Hi All,
Problems can sometimes be solved by _carefully_ reading the documentation:
snip
Some clients re-download all mails if you change the hostname in the client
configuration. Be aware of this when testing.
snip
We converted without a hitch this morning. Thank you for great
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:50:39 -0700
Kui Zhang articulated:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2011-09-27 2:06 PM, Ed W li...@wildgooses.com wrote:
On 20/09/2011 03:10, Kui Zhang wrote:
thunderbird does not really work for us, due to
Depends on how you think about it.
If you forget about email addresses. Dovecot works on mailbox's, and
it maps a mailbox to a path, username, and password.
In postfix, it only cares about email addresses (if you use dovecot
for delivery, if not then postfix also has to care about the
Does anybody have any suggestions?
Upgrade - which probably won't fix your problem, but because the
version you're using is so old should be considered a requirement
before asking for further help.
OK, I upgraded to the current version of Dovecot, which didn't
actually fix anything.
On 9/27/2011 4:50 PM, Kui Zhang wrote:
I think if you disable the new local indexing features in TB then it
should start running fairly decently?
I had indexing disabled... that did not help much.
TB work better after I have these settings...
mail.imap.expunge_after_delete true
19 matches
Mail list logo
