On 15.02.2012 08:47, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Hi i am not sure what are trying to goal
with domain quota, if you setup your accounts i.e with postfixadmin etc
then its up to the gui logic , stopping postmasters to setup more
accounts ( with quotas ) as you ( the superadmin ) want.
My fault, I
Am 28.01.2012 22:06, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
Am 28.01.2012 21:07, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
On 13.1.2012, at 20.29, Mark Moseley wrote:
If there are multiple hosts, it seems like the most robust thing to do
would be to exhaust the existing connections and if none of those
succeed, then start
Am 15.02.2012 09:07, schrieb Adam Szpakowski:
On 15.02.2012 08:47, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Hi i am not sure what are trying to goal
with domain quota, if you setup your accounts i.e with postfixadmin etc
then its up to the gui logic , stopping postmasters to setup more
accounts ( with quotas
On 15.02.2012 09:19, Robert Schetterer wrote:
as workaround it should be possible to calculate filllevel
by domain with some bash script and cron sending an info mail to you
might be not exact, but enough to see whats going on ( depends on your
real domain/mailbox setup...maildir etc)
[cut]
Hi
Im not an expert in Dovecot but what prohibits you adding a field to the
table
Dovecot will not use it thats all
Im not sure what version of database You are using but postgres,oracle and
never versions of mysql have something called views (could be used to hide
the additional column from
On 15.02.2012 03:37, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 15.2.2012, at 4.35, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Oh, this is most likely related because you're not running in high-performance
login process mode, unlike pretty much everyone else running proxies:
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/LoginProcess
Since yesterday all
On 15.02.2012 04:46, Timo Sirainen wrote:
The attached patch fixes it. I'll commit it to v2.1 hg after I'll release
v2.1.0..
Thanks. I guess it would be wise to upgrade our new Dovecot mail store
to 2.1 before we migrate all our Courier maildir users to it...
Cheers,
Chnristoph
--
On 15.2.2012, at 10.51, Christoph Bußenius wrote:
Do you see some error message also about Too many open files,
Ah, now that I grep for it, I see those messages too :) During one hour, the
messages were logged with the following number of occurrences:
- Twice: dovecot: anvil: Error:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 03:49:21AM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Looking at the timestamps in the filesystem I see that the users home
directory wasn't created before switcing to imap.
Is this a know problem?
Probably again a bug in your specific Dovecot version. :) I remember doing
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 12:52 +0100, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
Is it maybe changeset 11683:148fccbe9f32 you remeber:
- - maildir: sometimes rm -rf Maildir;imaptest logout=0 gives
- Error: Opening INBOX failed: Mailbox doesn't exist: INBOX
That's probably maildir-specific. But
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 08:26 +0100, Adam Szpakowski wrote:
On 15.02.2012 02:55, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 15.2.2012, at 3.54, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Domain-quota support in Dovecot is only partial. Recalculating domain
quota would require more code. Last time when someone asked about this I
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 09:10 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Hi Timo,just to make sure
i have an extra
dovecot-dict-quota-sql.conf.ext ( dove 2.0.18 )
connect = host=192.168.123.150 dbname=.. user=... password=...
..
is it possible to have i.e
connect = host=192.168.123.150 host=127.0.0.1
Hi all,
today I have compiled Dovecot-2.0.18 with Dovecot-Pigeonwhole-0.2.6.
Now I have following Problem with sieve:
%-
main_script: line 249: error: included personal script 'vacation.sieve'
does not exist.
main_script:
On 15.2.2012, at 16.55, Ralf Zimmermann wrote:
main_script: line 249: error: included personal script 'vacation.sieve'
does not exist.
..
If I use Dovecot-2.0.17 and Dovecot-Pigeonwhole-0.2.5 with the same
configuration I can define
include :personal vacation.sieve;
include :personal
On 2/14/2012 4:42 PM, Willie Gillespie wrote:
On 02/14/2012 01:40 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 2/14/2012 12:06 PM, Willie Gillespie wrote:
On 2/13/2012 8:34 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
I'm fighting the same issue. With the current release (2.1rc6) no
errors
are logged - but I'm having
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 03:55:28PM +0100, Ralf Zimmermann wrote:
If I use Dovecot-2.0.17 and Dovecot-Pigeonwhole-0.2.5 with the same
configuration I can define
include :personal vacation.sieve;
in my main sieve script. All works fine.
Changelog v0.2.6:
* This release fixes
Thanks Thomas and Timo for the fast answer.
Next time I'll read the News file ;-) It' works now.
On 02/15/2012 04:14 PM, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 03:55:28PM +0100, Ralf Zimmermann wrote:
If I use Dovecot-2.0.17 and Dovecot-Pigeonwhole-0.2.5 with the same
configuration I
Am 15.02.2012 14:07, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 09:10 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Hi Timo,just to make sure
i have an extra
dovecot-dict-quota-sql.conf.ext ( dove 2.0.18 )
connect = host=192.168.123.150 dbname=.. user=... password=...
..
is it possible to have i.e
Am 15.02.2012 17:10, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
Am 15.02.2012 14:07, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 09:10 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Hi Timo,just to make sure
i have an extra
dovecot-dict-quota-sql.conf.ext ( dove 2.0.18 )
connect = host=192.168.123.150 dbname=.. user=...
On 15.2.2012, at 20.22, Robert Schetterer wrote:
sorry for some more question
what is the default behave if dict quota over sql cant be reached
i.e with lmtp
something like log warning and deliver anyway ?
I think it tempfails. Try.
On 15.2.2012, at 5.08, l...@airstreamcomm.net l...@airstreamcomm.net wrote:
I know you mentioned you would cover this in a coming post, but we were
curious what the new dsync replication will be capable of. Would it
monitor changes to mailboxes and push automatic replication to the remote
On 15.2.2012, at 20.51, Timo Sirainen wrote:
The initial version is really about doing all of this with NFS. In NFS setup
if two replaced storages
two replicated storages.. ugh.
are both mounted and the primary storage dies, Dovecot will start using the
replica. So that's HA.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
Here's a list of things I've been thinking about implementing for Dovecot
v2.2. Probably not all of them will make it, but I'm at least interested in
working on these if I have time.
Previously I've mostly been working on
On 15.2.2012, at 21.02, Mark Moseley wrote:
Not to beat a dead horse, but the ability to use remote directors
might be interesting. It'd make moving into a director setup probably
a bit more easy. Then any server could proxy to the backend servers,
but without losing the advantage of
On 15.02.2012 14:05, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Is there a way to add domainname as another collumn in dbase? This will
simplify the SQL query and the GROUP BY could be used.
Not currently. Perhaps for v2.2 dict-sql redesign.
It will be great feature.
Well, yeah, it kind of works, but not 100% :)
Am 15.02.2012 19:43, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
On 15.2.2012, at 20.22, Robert Schetterer wrote:
sorry for some more question
what is the default behave if dict quota over sql cant be reached
i.e with lmtp
something like log warning and deliver anyway ?
I think it tempfails. Try.
hm, test
I received this error at the end of a migration from imapc to mdbox. Is
it because I wanted doveadm 'sync' instead of 'backup'? I didn't get
time to do any testing, but since you're pushing for the release, here
it is:
kerio2:~ adminuser$ /opt/dovecot/bin/doveadm -o imapc_user=jsample -o
On 15.2.2012, at 21.30, Metro Domain Admin wrote:
I received this error at the end of a migration from imapc to mdbox. Is
it because I wanted doveadm 'sync' instead of 'backup'? I didn't get
time to do any testing, but since you're pushing for the release, here
it is:
kerio2:~ adminuser$
Am 15.02.2012 20:10, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
Am 15.02.2012 19:43, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
On 15.2.2012, at 20.22, Robert Schetterer wrote:
sorry for some more question
what is the default behave if dict quota over sql cant be reached
i.e with lmtp
something like log warning and deliver
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012, at 10:50 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 15.2.2012, at 22.48, Metro Domain Admin wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012, at 09:36 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Yes, it's because of sync. The Not supported comes from imapc
backend, because Dovecot tried to do some changes to it that
Hello,
Here is a more meanigful backtrace. It happens every time I log in,
using any imap client.
*
Core was generated by `imap'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0...done.
Loaded symbols for
Tried it, found it could trigger NFS issue.
The test is on one machine runs the script to lock the dovecot-uidlist,
moving mail into cur/new, append one line to dovecot-uidlist, and unlock
it. On another different machine, run one script to SELECT, another script
to COPY. Found the similar
Moi Timo / all.
I've been using Dovecot on my Qmailtoaster production mailserver for
some years - since 1.0.7 and current Version 2.0.10 - works perfectly.
Now I am installing a backupsystem and a VM testsystem (2 boxes) - and
no matter how and what Version I am installing on these 2 boxes I get
On 16.2.2012, at 5.59, Andy YB Hu wrote:
Tried it, found it could trigger NFS issue.
..
Whether it means the dovecot LDA also needs to run on the same server with
the backend server?
Yes, the only 100% safe way is to do all simultaneous mailbox access via the
same backend server.
Sounds a little tricky. For backend server, director makes sense. But for
LDA, it's also suggested to deploy the LDA on the same machine with backend
server? Topologically, it's very possible the machine where LDA is running
is separated from one of backend server. I will run the similar tests
On 16.2.2012, at 8.25, Andy YB Hu wrote:
Sounds a little tricky. For backend server, director makes sense. But for
LDA, it's also suggested to deploy the LDA on the same machine with backend
server? Topologically, it's very possible the machine where LDA is running
is separated from one of
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 02:04:52 +0100, Finn B f...@kirstineslund.dk
wrote:
Now I come to think of it I realize that my production system is
intel
based and the 2 new ones are AMD based and wonder if this may be the
case ?
Dovecot 2.0.3 to 2.0.16 works fine on my DualCore Opterons (VMs).
37 matches
Mail list logo
