On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 01:38:14PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Great news. I would love to test it, if I will be able to run this on a
test
account, only. All other users should become synced the old way for the
time
being.
Would that be possible with the current
dear dovecot users,
This is my first post and with a rather embarassing question. To soften the
question up I just want to say I've been very pleased with Dovecot thus far and
its low maintenance requirements - perhaps to pleased!
I am running an ancient version of Dovecot, version
On 4.3.2012, at 13.54, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 4.3.2012, at 13.41, Michael Grimm wrote:
By undeletable do you mean you have mails that always come back after
expunging them?
Yes. Deleting by the client will return them after the next dsync run.
Luckily this just started happening to me
On 5.3.2012, at 9.25, Attila Nagy wrote:
On 03/04/12 11:44, Timo Sirainen wrote:
In dovecot-2.1 hg you can now test dsync-based replication. Everything isn't
finished yet, but it appears to work and I've enabled it for my @dovecot.fi
mails. Some issues:
Do you plan to make it more
On 5.3.2012, at 11.51, Charles C wrote:
I am running an ancient version of Dovecot, version 1.0.beta9. Do I risk
corrupting indices etc by upgrading in one go to 2.1.2?
Just delete the indexes and you don't have to worry about problems related to
them. The config file is different though and
On 5.3.2012, at 10.35, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
1) Replicator syncs all users at startup. If you can change your userdb
iteration to return only one test user for replicator that avoids it. (You
may be able to do protocol replicator { userdb {..} } and protocol
!replicator { .. })
On 2012-03-05 3:43 AM, kada...@gmail.com kada...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 02/03/12 13:40, Charles Marcus a écrit :
On 2012-02-28 11:28 AM, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2012-02-28 11:05 AM, kfx kada...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok I feel ashame... it was a third party init scrip who
On 2012-02-28 9:57 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
So, Solr in Dovecot works perfectly.
Timo, a follow-up on this...
Thunderbird has a 'Quickfilter Toolbar' with a little searchbox that
applies a filter of the current folder message view pane (to show you
only messages in the pane that
On 03/02/12 01:04, Timo Sirainen wrote:
The difference between your previously working system and currently
working system is the GSSAPI/Kerberos libraries.
Just to close this thread off, seems that the bug was in the cyrus-sasl
libraries that kmail uses. Reverting from the 2.1.25 version
On 03/05/12 11:08, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 5.3.2012, at 9.25, Attila Nagy wrote:
On 03/04/12 11:44, Timo Sirainen wrote:
In dovecot-2.1 hg you can now test dsync-based replication. Everything isn't
finished yet, but it appears to work and I've enabled it for my @dovecot.fi
mails. Some
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 12:45:26PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
So, ideally (for us), dovecot should keep a log over which accounts are
active (has received or checked mail), and only sync users that has been
active for the last $timeperiode on startup.
Well, all of this could be done
On 5.3.2012, at 14.15, Attila Nagy wrote:
On 03/04/12 11:44, Timo Sirainen wrote:
In dovecot-2.1 hg you can now test dsync-based replication. Everything
isn't finished yet, but it appears to work and I've enabled it for my
@dovecot.fi mails. Some issues:
Do you plan to make it more
Hi,
I noticed a difference between courier and dovecot, and I'm not sure
which of them is wrong wrt. RFC3501 - if any.
I have a Maildir which has been accessed by an Apple Mail client, so it
got folders like:
INBOX
INBOX.Trash
INBOX.INBOX.folder
INBOX.INBOX.folder.a
INBOX.INBOX.folder.b
On 03/05/12 13:48, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 5.3.2012, at 14.15, Attila Nagy wrote:
On 03/04/12 11:44, Timo Sirainen wrote:
In dovecot-2.1 hg you can now test dsync-based replication. Everything isn't
finished yet, but it appears to work and I've enabled it for my @dovecot.fi
mails. Some
On 5.3.2012, at 15.11, Attila Nagy wrote:
dsync doesn't currently take enough advantage of modseqs and send only the
changed data.
Hm. What is your estimate about the performance capability of the current
best replication scheme available in Dovecot?
I know it's hard to tell, because there
On 5.3.2012, at 13.24, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-02-28 9:57 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
So, Solr in Dovecot works perfectly.
Timo, a follow-up on this...
Thunderbird has a 'Quickfilter Toolbar' with a little searchbox that applies
a filter of the current folder message view
On 5.3.2012, at 14.35, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 12:45:26PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
So, ideally (for us), dovecot should keep a log over which accounts are
active (has received or checked mail), and only sync users that has been
active for the last $timeperiode
On 2012-03-05 15:45, Timo Sirainen wrote:
* LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) . INBOX.INBOX
I'm surprised Courier would return this.
But dovecot does not list that folder using *.
But it returns all of the mailboxes under INBOX.INBOX, right?
Yes. And they exists on disk and are subscribed
On 5.3.2012, at 16.56, Peter Mogensen wrote:
This makes some clients using * to get the folder list ignore the
folderes below INBOX.INBOX.
What clients? I haven't heard of this being a problem before. I think Cyrus
has similar behavior as Dovecot.
Well... mostly perl scripts :) - which
On 5.3.2012, at 15.01, Peter Mogensen wrote:
I have a Maildir which has been accessed by an Apple Mail client, so it got
folders like:
INBOX
INBOX.Trash
INBOX.INBOX.folder
INBOX.INBOX.folder.a
INBOX.INBOX.folder.b
The INBOX.INBOX folder does not exist on disk and is not subscribed.
On 2012-03-05 9:48 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 5.3.2012, at 13.24, Charles Marcus wrote:
Thunderbird has a 'Quickfilter Toolbar' with a little searchbox
that applies a filter of the current folder message view pane (to
show you only messages in the pane that meet the criteria
On 5.3.2012, at 18.12, Charles Marcus wrote:
One last question then (couldn't find an answer on the wiki)...
I'm currently planning on using fts/clucene, but I'm thinking I'd like the
following to apply also to dovecots internal indexes too...
What is the minimal number of characters
On 2012-03-05 12:01 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 5.3.2012, at 18.12, Charles Marcus wrote:
Thunderbird has an annoying behavior where it sends a new/separate
query each time a character is typed, beginning with the very first
character:
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 09:21 +0100, Jacek Osiecki wrote:
However, if we have everything redundant, why not have the same with SMTP
and POP3/IMAP? But - won't anything fail if two (or more) dovecots are
accessing the same disk space, both for IMAP/POP3
On 5.3.2012, at 19.25, Jacek Osiecki wrote:
However, if we have everything redundant, why not have the same with SMTP
and POP3/IMAP? But - won't anything fail if two (or more) dovecots are
accessing the same disk space, both for IMAP/POP3 and LDA/LMTP?
If both servers randomly access users'
The attached patch makes it possible for Kerberos principals to be
associated with a password database entry by adding a new k5principals
passdb setting. A client that successfully authenticates using GSSAPI
will be able to log in as any user who has been associated with the
client's Kerberos
On 5.3.2012, at 20.45, Sam Morris wrote:
3. The credentials lookup triggers an info log message saying that
credentials for GSSAPI were requested, but we have only (e.g.)
MD5-CRYPT. The authplugin doesn't actually want the credential,
but I think that the only way the
I've been looking at some documentation on shared mail accounts. But I'm
getting mixed thoughts on how this can or should be done.
I use mbox for all my pop and imap folders since I've converted from a
uw-imap server. The first thing that makes me wonder about setup is that
I've been told to
I see a new POP3C lib-storage client backend in dovecot 2.1, but I
don't see anything in the 2.1 doc directory or in the wiki. Can this
be used to synchronize dovecot with external pop servers? Doing away
with my current fetchmail and lmtp solution for this would be quite
interesting.
Thanks for
On 3/5/2012 1:30 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
I've been looking at some documentation on shared mail accounts. But I'm
getting mixed thoughts on how this can or should be done.
I use mbox for all my pop and imap folders since I've converted from a
uw-imap server. The first thing that makes me
I have a setup where I need to use a Master User account to login on
behalf of users normally authed via PAM. Is there any existing mechanism
that will allow master users to be wired down to specific ip address rather
than having these very magic user/pass combos be valid from any random
host?
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Timo Sirainen writes:
I would like to run various doveadm commands that involves all (mail) users
like
doveadm expunge -A mailbox Trash savedbefore 30d
but any doveadm command that uses -A to iterate through all users will
stop processing at the first account with
On 2012-03-05 16:36, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Still curious about if Courier is doing something wrong which the scripts just
happened to take advantage of.
Neither behavior is wrong, just different. :)
Ok... I were in doubt if I had missed something from the RFC.
However... for testing, I tried
Hello all,
I've squirrelmail-webmail-1.4.22, dovecot 2.1.1, dovecot-2.1-pigeonhole-0.3.0
installed and working. But I've problems to get the avelsieve plugin for
squirrelmail working with dovecot.
The Message Filters show up in Options of squirrelmail, but
Could not log on to timsieved
34 matches
Mail list logo
