On 2012-03-13 6:29 PM, Terry Carmen te...@cnysupport.com wrote:
I'm going to hope everything is OK for a while, since my goal is to retire
all the old Exchange servers and move all the users to dovecot/maildir
within the next couple of months.
However it's always nice to know there are options.
Em 13-03-2012 15:58, Marcio Merlone escreveu:
Em 13-03-2012 13:49, Timo Sirainen escreveu:
A perfectly working solution would be to (upgrade to v2.x and) switch
to sdbox or mdbox format with alt storage enabled, then you could
simply do: doveadm altmove -A mailbox 'Archives*' all
Should this
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 08:51 -0300, Marcio Merlone wrote:
Em 13-03-2012 15:58, Marcio Merlone escreveu:
Em 13-03-2012 13:49, Timo Sirainen escreveu:
A perfectly working solution would be to (upgrade to v2.x and) switch
to sdbox or mdbox format with alt storage enabled, then you could
On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 21:19 +0100, e-frog wrote:
On 13.03.2012 20:16, wrote Timo Sirainen:
On 13.3.2012, at 20.42, e-frog wrote:
This is what I have done:
1. Create the directory /tmp/backup which is empty
2. Run doveadm -v backup -u testuser@ubuntu-test.localdomain
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 01:25 -0400, Michescu Andrei wrote:
Now, as long as I touch the mailbox of user1 only on mx1.a doveadm sync
keeps them in sync (cron job every 5 minutes).
The problem comes when I start using the master-master model: emails
starts getting duplicate with different ids.
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 14:28 +0100, Jernej Porenta wrote:
Heya,
We are expiriencing issues with dovecot 2.1.1 on Linux with weird
filenames in home directory of username. We are using mbox IMAP
folders, with no special changes (mail_location = mbox:~/:INBOX=%
h/.mailbox).
Mar 6 13:37:17
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 08:17 +0100, Peter Mogensen wrote:
On 2012-03-05 16:36, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Still curious about if Courier is doing something wrong which the scripts
just happened to take advantage of.
Neither behavior is wrong, just different. :)
Ok... I were in doubt if I had
I've mostly finished a conversion from an old Centos 3 UW-Imap server to
a new Centos 6 dovecot server. I did not copy the old ~/.mailboxlist
file to ~/mail/.subscriptions file, but notice some users have the
latter file now. These are all mbox folders on the old and new server.
I'm getting
Em 14-03-2012 09:19, Timo Sirainen escreveu:
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 08:51 -0300, Marcio Merlone wrote:
Em 13-03-2012 15:58, Marcio Merlone escreveu:
Em 13-03-2012 13:49, Timo Sirainen escreveu:
A perfectly working solution would be to (upgrade to v2.x and) switch
to sdbox or mdbox format with
On 3/14/2012 10:46 AM, Steve Campbell wrote:
One last question, please.
Over the years, some imap accounts had their folders directly in their
home directory and the contents of the .mailboxlist file would have an
entry with just the name of the folder in it (Trash, eg), and most had
the
On 03/14/2012 06:58 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-03-13 6:29 PM, Terry Carmen te...@cnysupport.com wrote:
I'm going to hope everything is OK for a while, since my goal is to
retire
all the old Exchange servers and move all the users to dovecot/maildir
within the next couple of months.
Hello,
we are using dovecot 2.0.13 with maildir++ (we migrated away from
courrier just a few months ago) and the RECENT status doesn't seem to be
working:
. STATUS INBOX (MESSAGES UNSEEN RECENT)
* STATUS INBOX (MESSAGES 35106 RECENT 0 UNSEEN 10)
then 2 minutes later:
. STATUS INBOX
On 14.3.2012, at 18.06, Arnaud Abélard wrote:
Hello,
we are using dovecot 2.0.13 with maildir++ (we migrated away from courrier
just a few months ago) and the RECENT status doesn't seem to be working:
. STATUS INBOX (MESSAGES UNSEEN RECENT)
* STATUS INBOX (MESSAGES 35106 RECENT 0 UNSEEN
Hi Timo,
I updated my 2.1 from HG, and now the FTS (Squat) plugin
makes a segmentation fault.
When I remove the plugin from the
dovecot.conf, all works fine.
No debug available here, but let me know
how can I help you.
Joan
Hello,
Nope dsync was not running during the email delivery on that account. I've
simulated in a controlled environment.
Servers are having different priorities, but this was a basic scenario to
test the master-master synchronization.
Think that for incoming SMTP I can even restrict which
On 14.3.2012, at 18.45, Michescu Andrei wrote:
Nope dsync was not running during the email delivery on that account. I've
simulated in a controlled environment.
How? You mean simply deliver mail to server A and to server B and run dsync and
it duplicates it? I can't reproduce it that way,
On 14.3.2012, at 18.36, Joan Moreau wrote:
I updated my 2.1 from HG, and now the FTS (Squat) plugin
makes a segmentation fault.
To which version exactly? Because I broke FTS two days ago and fixed it
yesterday, maybe you were unlucky enough to get a broken version.
No debug available here,
On 2012-03-14 10:46 AM, Steve Campbell campb...@cnpapers.com wrote:
Over the years, some imap accounts had their folders directly in their
home directory and the contents of the .mailboxlist file would have an
entry with just the name of the folder in it (Trash, eg), and most had
the folders in
On 14.3.2012, at 18.45, Michescu Andrei wrote:
Nope dsync was not running during the email delivery on that account.
I've
simulated in a controlled environment.
How? You mean simply deliver mail to server A and to server B and run
dsync and it duplicates it? I can't reproduce it that way,
I have been unlucky in deed.
Problem solved with recent changes
Le 14/03/2012 22:43, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
On 14.3.2012, at
18.36, Joan Moreau wrote:
I updated my 2.1 from HG, and now the
FTS (Squat) plugin makes a segmentation fault.
To which version
exactly? Because I broke FTS
On 14.03.2012 14:41, wrote Timo Sirainen:
On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 21:19 +0100, e-frog wrote:
On 13.03.2012 20:16, wrote Timo Sirainen:
On 13.3.2012, at 20.42, e-frog wrote:
This is what I have done:
1. Create the directory /tmp/backup which is empty
2. Run doveadm -v backup -u
On 3/14/2012 1:00 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-03-14 10:46 AM, Steve Campbell campb...@cnpapers.com wrote:
Over the years, some imap accounts had their folders directly in their
home directory and the contents of the .mailboxlist file would have an
entry with just the name of the folder
Hi --
On 14.03.2012, at 15:09, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 01:25 -0400, Michescu Andrei wrote:
The problem comes when I start using the master-master model: emails
starts getting duplicate with different ids.
I was testing this a bit, and I guess in your tests dsync was
On 14.3.2012, at 22.36, Michael Grimm wrote:
And spammers don't care about mx priorities at all :-(
But spams go to spam mailbox where duplicates don't really matter. :)
Hi -
On 14.03.2012, at 22:14, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 14.3.2012, at 22.36, Michael Grimm wrote:
And spammers don't care about mx priorities at all :-(
But spams go to spam mailbox where duplicates don't really matter. :)
True ;-) But spam mails might interfere with syncing of legitimate
Hi --
On 14.03.2012, at 22:26, Michael Grimm wrote:
But spam mails might interfere with syncing of legitimate
mail arriving at the same time.
Forget about that part, I was wrong because duplicates are
produced in corresponding mailboxes, only.
Sorry for the noise,
Michael
On 14.3.2012, at 22.36, Michael Grimm wrote:
And spammers don't care about mx priorities at all :-(
But spams go to spam mailbox where duplicates don't really matter. :)
In an ideal world yes... or no.
In our deployment spam is simply header tagged and left in INBOX. Each
user can decide
Hi --
On 14.03.2012, at 15:09, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 01:25 -0400, Michescu Andrei wrote:
The problem comes when I start using the master-master model: emails
starts getting duplicate with different ids.
I was testing this a bit, and I guess in your tests dsync was
Hi --
On 14.03.2012, at 21:58, Michescu Andrei wrote:
Sometimes croncobs are running on both servers at the same time
producing locally delivered mails simultaneously, though. Ok, one
can modify run times accordingly ...
Why do you run the crontab on all the servers? You can run a
I'm curious if anyone has any plugins for AV integration directly into
dovecot.
Our old pop servers have been scanning messges as they're moved from
new-cur in the inbox and, at least where user's aren't poping every
few seconds, there is occasionally enough time between scanning through
the
Hi Timo Dovecot users,
We have a 2-node director setup which front-ends for 4 nodes which share
a clustered filesystem (GFS). All nodes run Dovecot 2.0.18.
Approximately 40k users, but typically only a few thousand active at any
time.
The director nodes run sendmail, which deliver mail
31 matches
Mail list logo
