On 2012-05-18 10:18 PM, Tamsy dovecot-l...@mohtex.net wrote:
This thread has already evolved into an ideological conflict. Better to
leave it now since every word, every further argument is just heating
the atmosphere up and is scaring other users off the list…
Best just to PLONK Noel, as I
On Sat, 19 May 2012 11:36:24 +1000
Noel Butler articulated:
non-event? You wouldnt be saying that if certain other operators with
their products did that. I've seen you bitch and whinge about far far
far less over the years Jerry.
Hell I bitch about a lot of things; however, that does not change
Hi everyone,
I have a dovecot 2.1.6 setup with fts_lucene.
The lucene indexes get created/updated fine when I do a manual search thru
telnet.
However, if I run a webapp that uses the php::imap_search function, the
index never gets created/updated. I run indo the same problem with
thunderbird
Sorry for double-posting, but i forgot to mention something:
If I run php::imap_search() AFTER having manually updated the lucene
indexes (thru a telnet command), I see a HUGE gain in search performance
compared to before creating the lucene indexes (at least 1 order of
magnitude).
-Joe
On
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 13:19 -0400, Joe Beaubien wrote:
I have a dovecot 2.1.6 setup with fts_lucene.
The lucene indexes get created/updated fine when I do a manual search thru
telnet.
So you run SEARCH TEXT or SEARCH BODY?
However, if I run a webapp that uses the php::imap_search
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 23:44 +0200, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
right now my index directory is part of the users home directory:
mail_home = /var/mail/%d/%n
mail_location = mdbox:~/mdbox
I want the indexes to be stored in a different location:
mail_home = /var/mail/%d/%n
mail_location =
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 22:10 +0100, Tim Smith wrote:
Interesting - just so I have this clear in my own head. The password
scheme is the way the password is encrypted
Yes.
but the authentication
mechanism is whether the password is sent encrypted as well?
Something like that. It's about
Sendmail configuration isn't relevant with Dovecot. Set
auth_debug_passwords=yes to debug why the authentication isn't working.
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 09:19 +0200, Manuel Fernández Panzuela wrote:
Then, which is the correct configuration ? Are my config files ok ?
Openldap stores passwords
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 15:59 +0300, Mark Zealey wrote:
We're now migrating customers onto a dovecot-2 platform, switching from
Maildir to sdbox (using dsync mirror) changing the namespace at the
same time. New namespace configuration looks like (as taken from
Trying to clean out old undead messages from users to reduce disk space.
Need a script that will recurse all the user directories and delete all
unread email that is over 90 days old.
Anyone have that?
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 20:11 +0200, Daniel Parthey wrote:
Maybe this is not the original problem, but here is some way to
reproduce a similar behaviour.
This behavior is intentional.
#
# Move Email around #
#
Move Email two times between Trash and
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
You must not lose indexes with mdbox or you'll lose message flags and
mails may also end up going to wrong mailboxes.
Yes, have been there but this behaviour is confusing me as I find
conflicting information in the wiki:
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/IndexFiles
If index
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 14:31 +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote:
I'm trying to setup a server with public mailboxes only
but I cannot succeed.
Do you still have specific users? Do you want the users to have
subscriptions? Do you need ACLs?
If it's simply a fully public server, you wouldn't really need
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 11:41 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
Trying to clean out old undead messages from users to reduce disk space.
Need a script that will recurse all the user directories and delete all
unread email that is over 90 days old.
Anyone have that?
doveadm -A expunge mailbox '*'
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 20:43 +0200, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
You must not lose indexes with mdbox or you'll lose message flags and
mails may also end up going to wrong mailboxes.
Yes, have been there but this behaviour is confusing me as I find
conflicting
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 12:39 +0200, Lazy wrote:
May 16 12:11:36 thebe2 dovecot: imap(lazy): Error:
open(/snapshot/h1/vmail/la/lazy/Maildir/.SPAM/dovecot-uidlist.lock)
failed: Read-only file system
Does the attached patch help?
maybe it will be easier to move all dovecot metadata to separate
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 09:32 +0100, Kaya Saman wrote:
I managed to find this on the wiki:
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/ActiveDirectoryNtlm
and followed it - though I don't think it's for Dovecot2 even though
it's on the portion of the Wiki for Dovecot v2. lot's of
references to
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 08:59 +0200, Urban Loesch wrote:
The Server was running about 1 year without any problems. 15Min Load was
between 0,5 and max 8.
No high IOWAIT. CPU Idletime about 98%.
..
# iostat -k
Linux 3.0.28-vs2.3.2.3-rol-em64t (mailstore4) 16.05.2012
_x86_64_
With IMAP the users must have a mail directory. So you should create
home directories for the users. Also see
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/VirtualUsers/Home
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 09:12 -0500, Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jimenez
wrote:
There are no home directory for those users, I think I should start
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 15:08 +0200, Lazy wrote:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x7f1975cccdee in expire_mailbox_transaction_commit (t=value
optimized out, changes_r=value optimized out) at
expire-plugin.c:169
169 } else if (strcmp(value, 0)
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 12:23 +0200, Wouter de Geus wrote:
Hello folks,
This morning I tried to open an old archive mail folder using Mutt.
However, while fetching headers it aborted.
Checking the dovecot log gave me this:
@40004fb21996267d37d4 imap(benv): Error: Cached message size
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 09:21 -0400, Root Kev wrote:
During the last time that the load went up, it became unable to login / su
to root for the entire period that dovecot was running, we had to kill
dovecot and go back to Popa3d until the mailq was cleared up. We are
running CentOS 5.6 server.
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 16:39 -0400, Joe Beaubien wrote:
I am getting some very weird search results with fts_solr.
1) when I do a search for testin I get 0 results.
2) when I do a search for testing i get 44 results.
The problem is that I am expecting only 1 result.
Solr uses stemming for
Timo Sirainen wrote:
This behavior is intentional.
Move Email two times between Trash and INBOX (4 moves in total).
There is still only one physical message, just moved it around a bit.
You're not moving a message, you're copying and setting \deleted flag
for the original message.
Le 19/05/2012 20:44, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 14:31 +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote:
I'm trying to setup a server with public mailboxes only
but I cannot succeed.
Do you still have specific users? Do you want the users to have
subscriptions? Do you need ACLs?
yes I need
See answers inline.
I just want to add that i also tried the parameter fts_index_timeout = 10
in the plugin section. Unfortunately the logs never showed me any indexing
taking place. I also tried fts_index_timeout = 10s in case i had the
wrong syntax.
I also tried doveadm fts rescan -u my_user.
On 19.5.2012, at 23.40, Joe Beaubien wrote:
Ok, I enabled rawlog and noticed the code was only sending SEARCH FROM. I
modified it to also send a SEARCH TEXT and it triggered the fts index
update.
However, in my use case, that's not the search that needs to be done. The
search needed is
On 19.5.2012, at 23.40, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Le 19/05/2012 20:44, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 14:31 +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote:
I'm trying to setup a server with public mailboxes only
but I cannot succeed.
Do you still have specific users? Do you want the users to have
Answers inline.
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 19.5.2012, at 23.40, Joe Beaubien wrote:
Ok, I enabled rawlog and noticed the code was only sending SEARCH
FROM. I
modified it to also send a SEARCH TEXT and it triggered the fts index
update.
* Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi [2012-05-19 22:17:01 +0300]:
My question here is: Why does dovecot abort? Isn't the issue fixed after
the rename?
That file was fixed, but you probably have tons of them and it aborts
after each one. With IMAP protocol there's really no other good way to
do
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
But you really don't want any of this with mdbox, not deleting index
files or having per-backend index files.
What is the director/backend-stuff useful for if per-backend index files
is not recommended? As far as I understood, that's what it's all about.
Patrick
On 20.5.2012, at 1.03, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
But you really don't want any of this with mdbox, not deleting index
files or having per-backend index files.
What is the director/backend-stuff useful for if per-backend index files
is not recommended? As far as I
On 20.5.2012, at 0.12, Joe Beaubien wrote:
You can run doveadm index -u user to get new mails indexed.
Awesome, this does seem to work.
2 last questions:
- Does it update both indexes (dovecot and fts) or only
dovecot.index.cache? I ask because I didn't see any index messages in log
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
No. Director is simply about making sure that more than one server won't access
the same user's mailbox simultaneously. I'm not recommending per-backend index
files to any kind of setups. Perhaps the NFS wiki page should be changed also.
So using a director it should
On 20.5.2012, at 1.23, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
No. Director is simply about making sure that more than one server won't
access the same user's mailbox simultaneously. I'm not recommending
per-backend index files to any kind of setups. Perhaps the NFS wiki page
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 08:25 -0400, Jerry wrote:
Hell I bitch about a lot of things; however, that does not change the
facts of the case. Only a subset of this list received the message in
question -
Likely to see how many people bitched before the rest
- and I was not one of them.
There haven't been any new points raised in this thread since the first day.
There's no point in replying to to this thread anymore.
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 20.5.2012, at 0.12, Joe Beaubien wrote:
You can run doveadm index -u user to get new mails indexed.
Awesome, this does seem to work.
2 last questions:
- Does it update both indexes (dovecot and fts) or only
On 20.5.2012, at 5.15, Joe Beaubien wrote:
Is it normal to not get output in the normal log files in this case, or did
i miss something?
Before looking into it further, what's your doveconf -n output?
39 matches
Mail list logo
