Thanks for the hint for the first 2 points of the howto are false on our
system:
* we use docevot 2
* we have mailbox in maildir format
Regards,
Sandro
On 07/12/2012 11:04 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 12.07.2012 10:05, schrieb Sandro Tosi:
Could someone please give it a look? Timo? :)
Am 13.07.2012 08:46, schrieb Sandro Tosi:
Thanks for the hint for the first 2 points of the howto are false on our
system:
* we use docevot 2
* we have mailbox in maildir format
i wrote about ,take ideas, from there,
for sure you have to fit stuff to your needs ,ever
Regards,
Sandro
On 07/13/2012 03:42 AM, Ken Anderson wrote:
Voytek Eymont voy...@sbt.net.au wrote:
anyone has any tips what's best way to execute a script via email ?
I have a wget script that fetches some pages, and, emails me the
output,
there is no paramters passed, it's all in the script
I'll like to
Hello,
I know proxy_timeout is the timeout for the director operation. But
what is the purpose for proxy_refresh?
--
Angel L. Mateo Martínez
Sección de Telemática
Área de Tecnologías de la Información _o)
y las Comunicaciones Aplicadas (ATICA) / \\
http://www.um.es/atica
specifically from a filesystem IO perspective:
1. new mail delivery
not much difference.
2. searching a mailbox folder
if you do linear search then yes
3. mass deletion of emails from one mailbox folder
3 is not true.
maildir is more IO efficient when reading and deleting
anyone has any tips what's best way to execute a script via email ?
use procmail - it's easy and actually works. you can do basically
everything with procmail.
This question is off topic, dovecot is not SMTP agent.
I have a wget script that fetches some pages, and, emails me the output,
Old school - in /etc/aliases you can set:
user|/home/user/script
And read the mail from stdin.
Ken
works great but requires root to do this
Voytek Eymont voy...@sbt.net.au wrote:
anyone has any tips what's best way to execute a script via email ?
I have a wget script that
El 09/07/12 14:37, Robert Schetterer escribió:
guess this is latest for 12.04
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.4-precise/
I have check this 3.4 kernel and it seems there is no problem with it
--
Angel L. Mateo Martínez
Sección de Telemática
Área de Tecnologías de la
Am 13.07.2012 11:37, schrieb Angel L. Mateo:
El 09/07/12 14:37, Robert Schetterer escribió:
guess this is latest for 12.04
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.4-precise/
I have check this 3.4 kernel and it seems there is no problem with it
cool, thx for info
--
Best
On 7/12/2012 10:27 PM, Eray Aslan wrote:
dovecot-2.1.8 sieve-0.3.1 binutils-2.22
When dovecot and sieve is linked with ld.gold I get a segfault in
checkscript command:
$ telnet localhost 4190
[some output]
authenticate PLAIN base64_username_password
[some more output]
checkscript foobarscript
If you don't have root, you are probably going to be restricted from other
methods by the security policy of a shared host. In that case, just use
fetchmail or other means of checking mail for your 'trigger' message, then run
your process where you DO have permission.
Ken
Wojciech Puchar
On 7/13/2012 4:09 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
specifically from a filesystem IO perspective:
1. new mail delivery
not much difference.
maildir requires 3 (or is it 4?) metadata operations and a file write op
mbox requires a single file append operation.
2. searching a mailbox folder
On 2012-07-13 8:07 AM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
mbox is a pretty smart email storage format especially given its age.
It can do more with lesser storage hardware. Many simply don't give it
the credit it deserves.
The ideal is a hybrid - maildir for new mail, mbox (or mdbox)
not much difference.
maildir requires 3 (or is it 4?) metadata operations and a file write op
your remarks are mostly true, except concentrates too much on uncommon
situations and uncommon strange case of probably tens of thousands of mail
accounts that must be very limited.
From my
Am 13.07.2012 14:19, schrieb Charles Marcus:
On 2012-07-13 8:07 AM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
mbox is a pretty smart email storage format especially given its
age.
It can do more with lesser storage hardware. Many simply don't give
it
the credit it deserves.
The ideal is
the credit it deserves.
The ideal is a hybrid - maildir for new mail, mbox (or mdbox) for longer term
storage...
True. Not did this as never got I/O problems because of mail.
For larger installations in may be adventageous to use mbox based archives
on RAID5 (this would be mostly
longer term storage...
may I ask how you do archivate maildirs? With mbox I used mhonarc but
with maildir I do not really have a soluton yet.
mhonarc is mail to HTML converter.
We meant just converting format to mbox.
Hi,
I have managed to get an imapc connection to another server and bind its
contents to only one account (via global ACL).
The namespace itself is created as public, though it does not seem to
make a difference for this use case (i.e., it does not matter, whether
its type is 'public', 'shared',
On 07/13/2012 12:53 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
http://hg.rename-it.nl/dovecot-2.1-pigeonhole/rev/6ceeb6421231
Still no go with binutils-2.22. make check fails with the same error
message. Telnetting and issuing checkscript gives not a segfault but
some parser error.
I can't reproduce this (on
On 07/13/2012 11:14 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
anyone has any tips what's best way to execute a script via email ?
use procmail - it's easy and actually works. you can do basically
everything with procmail.
This question is off topic, dovecot is not SMTP agent.
I have a wget script that
On 7/13/2012 7:28 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
not much difference.
maildir requires 3 (or is it 4?) metadata operations and a file write op
your remarks are mostly true, except concentrates too much on uncommon
situations and uncommon strange case of probably tens of thousands of
mail
mail accounts that must be very limited.
There are many folks on this list who ran out of IOPS due to maildir at
one time or another. Nowhere near tens of thousands of accounts were
not required. To solve the problem, they either purchased more
did you actually monitored WHAT part of job
Stable release
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_release_life_cycle 3.22 /
September 10, 2001
[...]
Procmail is widely used on Unix
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix-based systems and stable, but no
longer maintained; users who wish to use a maintained
program are advised to use an
Am 13.07.2012 20:45, schrieb Wojciech Puchar:
Typical SMB setup it seems.
True. More - i always try to mix services. No separate file servers, mail
servers, whatever servers but all
on same. On large install divide by groups of people, not services.
This way i really cannot get to high
Am 13.07.2012 20:46, schrieb Wojciech Puchar:
Stable release
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_release_life_cycle 3.22 /
September 10, 2001
[...]
Procmail is widely used on Unix
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix-based systems and stable, but no
longer maintained; users who wish to use
On 07/13/2012 09:06 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.07.2012 20:46, schrieb Wojciech Puchar:
Stable release
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_release_life_cycle 3.22 /
September 10, 2001
[...]
Procmail is widely used on Unix
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix-based systems and stable, but
26 matches
Mail list logo
