El 21/09/12 11:32, Tomáš Randa escribió:
Hello,
I still cannot get dovecot running with more then 1000 processes, but
hard limit is 8192 per user in box. I tried everything, including
modifying startup script of dovecot to set ulimit -u 8192. Could it be
some dovecot bug or dovecotfreebsd bug?
Hi
Testing dsync, things go wrong:
doveadm sync -u user remote:r...@mail2.example.net
dsync-local(user): Error: Mailboxes don't have unique GUIDs:
72e3be2c6f203b50883c44af56a8 is shared by RT and
RT_72e3be2c6f203b50883c44af56a8
Obviously RT_72e3be2c6f203b50883c44af56a8 is an
Hi Timo
I have a simple imapc gmail proxy test setup which works fine on 2.1.9,
but crashes on 2.1.10
# 2.1.10: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 3.4.7-1-ARCH x86_64
auth_mechanisms = plain login
imapc_host = imap.gmail.com
imapc_port = 993
imapc_ssl = imaps
imapc_ssl_ca_dir =
On 21.9.2012, at 8.28, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
doveadm multi [-A | -u wildcards] separator string comand 1 [separator
string command 2 [...]]
Thoughts?
As command name I could also think of doveadm sequence, which
implies the commands being executed in serial order.
On 24.9.2012, at 11.49, Oli Schacher wrote:
I have a simple imapc gmail proxy test setup which works fine on 2.1.9,
but crashes on 2.1.10
Sep 24 10:22:12 codemonkey dovecot: auth: Panic: file imapc-connection.c:
line 1289 (imapc_connection_connect_next_ip): assertion failed:
A user is logged in via imap from multiple devices.
The log has this:
Sep 21 11:46:32 postamt dovecot: imap(awer): delete: box=INBOX, uid=15347,
msgid=1341851741.4ffb085d2e2b7@swift.generated, size=15675
Sep 21 11:46:32 postamt dovecot: imap(awer): delete: box=INBOX, uid=15739,
On 24.9.2012, at 14.27, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
A user is logged in via imap from multiple devices.
The log has this:
Sep 21 11:46:32 postamt dovecot: imap(awer): delete: box=INBOX,
uid=15347, msgid=1341851741.4ffb085d2e2b7@swift.generated, size=15675
Sep 21 11:46:32 postamt dovecot:
On 09/22/2012 06:50 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 21.9.2012, at 11.23, A.L.E.C wrote:
On 09/20/2012 06:01 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Thoughts? Any better name for the command than multi?
How about 'execute' or 'exec'.
v2.1.10 already has dovecot exec that does a different thing. So can't be
* Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi:
This is also solved with mail_log_prefix change. The session's idea is
exactly to match the same session's log messages together. It's a
string guaranteed to be unique for the next .. was it 7 years or so.
Thanks. I changed the mail_log_prefix from
On 24.9.2012, at 14.44, A.L.E.C wrote:
next is run or pipe, but what if you create global separator option
and detect multi-command syntax usage automatically without a keyword?
Syntax for doveadm would be
doveadm [-Dv] [-f formatter] [-s separator] [-A | -u wildcards ] command
Hello,
I don't know if it's been addressed before, but anyway :
In my dovecot setup, I have local and virtual users. So, I need multiple passdb
backends. Namely, passwd for the local users and ldap for the virtual
users.
passdb {
driver = passwd
}
passdb {
args =
On 24.9.2012, at 16.48, Philippe Chevalier wrote:
dovecot: auth-worker(99126): Error: passwd(x...@domain.org,12.34.254.255):
getpwnam() failed: Invalid argument
I guess it's because the login is a full email that getpwnam fails.
So if you log in as nonexistent user foo.bar it doesn't log
On 23.9.2012, at 14.05, Joe Auty wrote:
#0 0x7f789cd08e14 in hash_table_destroy () from
/usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0
(gdb) bt full
#0 0x7f789cd08e14 in hash_table_destroy () from
/usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#1 0x7f789ccda054 in
On 24/09/2012 17:32, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 23.9.2012, at 14.05, Joe Auty wrote:
#0 0x7f789cd08e14 in hash_table_destroy () from
/usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0
(gdb) bt full
#0 0x7f789cd08e14 in hash_table_destroy () from
/usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0
No symbol table info
On 24.9.2012, at 17.55, Birta Levente wrote:
On 24/09/2012 17:32, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 23.9.2012, at 14.05, Joe Auty wrote:
#0 0x7f789cd08e14 in hash_table_destroy () from
/usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0
(gdb) bt full
#0 0x7f789cd08e14 in hash_table_destroy () from
On 24/09/2012 17:58, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 24.9.2012, at 17.55, Birta Levente wrote:
On 24/09/2012 17:32, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 23.9.2012, at 14.05, Joe Auty wrote:
#0 0x7f789cd08e14 in hash_table_destroy () from
/usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0
(gdb) bt full
#0
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 05:16:06PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 24.9.2012, at 16.48, Philippe Chevalier wrote:
dovecot: auth-worker(99126): Error: passwd(x...@domain.org,12.34.254.255):
getpwnam() failed: Invalid argument
I guess it's because the login is a full email that getpwnam fails.
Il 19/09/2012 15:07, Alessio Cecchi ha scritto:
Il 19/09/2012 15:03, Alessio Cecchi ha scritto:
Il 19/09/2012 14:48, Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
On 19.9.2012, at 13.54, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
LDA is configured and works fine but the problem is when the first
message arrive dovecot-lda return a
I'd like to know if after a release, for example the recently release
2.1.10, its common to see few days from the release some bug reports and
algo some patches, are theses patches applyed on the daily builds ?
--
Jean Michel Feltrin
Hi,
I'm trying to find out how to do traffic accounting with Dovecot 2.x,
preferrably v2.0.9, preferrably on CentOS 6.
I've previously asked on IRC, but there was little feedback, and my
understanding is now this list is the preferred media for such
inquiries. If I recall correctly, some weeks
At 2PM +0300 on 24/09/12 you (Timo Sirainen) wrote:
On 24.9.2012, at 14.44, A.L.E.C wrote:
next is run or pipe, but what if you create global separator option
and detect multi-command syntax usage automatically without a keyword?
Syntax for doveadm would be
doveadm [-Dv] [-f
El 21/09/12 11:32, Tomáš Randa escribió:
Hello,
I still cannot get dovecot running with more then 1000 processes, but
hard limit is 8192 per user in box. I tried everything, including
modifying startup script of dovecot to set ulimit -u 8192. Could it be
some dovecot bug or
Il 24/09/2012 17:40, Alessio Cecchi ha scritto:
Il 19/09/2012 15:07, Alessio Cecchi ha scritto:
Il 19/09/2012 15:03, Alessio Cecchi ha scritto:
Il 19/09/2012 14:48, Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
On 19.9.2012, at 13.54, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
LDA is configured and works fine but the problem is
Hello all,
I have a DL360 G4 1U server that does a wonderfull job with dovecot horde,
Xmail and OpenLDAP for a company and serving about 40 acouunts.
The machine is wonderful. I am very happy with it.
However, I am running out of disk space.
It has two times 76Gb Drives in RAID1 (disk mirroring)
Hello Spyros,
As best practice you never have the OS and the data/logs/user homes on
the same partition or set of disks.
If this is the case then your life is pretty easy:
-simply create the new set of partitions
-mount the new ones in a temporary location
-rsync (or copy everything from old
Am 24.09.2012 19:42, schrieb Spyros Tsiolis:
Hello all,
I have a DL360 G4 1U server that does a wonderfull job with dovecot horde,
Xmail and OpenLDAP for a company and serving about 40 acouunts.
The machine is wonderful. I am very happy with it.
However, I am running out of disk space.
This is one of those questions which is almost too easy if you are
familiar with Linux. Trying not to sound like a d*ck, but is it an
option to rent someone to help with admin jobs? For example, were it me
then I would probably have setup some partitioning scheme with separate
partitions for
Hello Spyros,
Oupss... the DL360 G4 has only 2 bays and no external SCSI/SATA
connector... so the solution below does not really apply to you :(
Andrei
Hello Spyros,
As best practice you never have the OS and the data/logs/user homes on
the same partition or set of disks.
If this is the
Am 24.09.2012 20:07, schrieb Michescu Andrei:
Hello Spyros,
Oupss... the DL360 G4 has only 2 bays and no external SCSI/SATA
connector... so the solution below does not really apply to you :(
Andrei
depends how long downtime is acceptable
i.e go rsync tmp over usb storage, or simple
tmp
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 05:04:40PM +0200, Philippe Chevalier wrote:
I will apply the patch later today and will let you know the result.
I applied the patch, and obviously, when getpwnam_r sets the result to
NULL and returns EINVAL, dovecot do as if the entry was not found and
stays mute.
- Original Message -
From: Michescu Andrei andrei.miche...@miau.ca
To: Dovecot Mailing List dovecot@dovecot.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, 24 September 2012, 21:07
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] 76Gb to 146Gb
Hello Spyros,
Oupss... the DL360 G4 has only 2 bays and no external SCSI/SATA
On 24/09/2012 19:07, Ed W wrote:
This is one of those questions which is almost too easy if you are
familiar with Linux. Trying not to sound like a d*ck, but is it an
option to rent someone to help with admin jobs? For example, were it
me then I would probably have setup some partitioning
Timo Sirainen mailto:t...@iki.fi
September 24, 2012 10:32 AM
Well, the good news is that it crashes only after it has already
disconnected the client anyway. But I thought I fixed this bug in
v2.1.10 and I'm not able to reproduce it myself.. Having debugging
information available might show
- Original Message -
From: Ed W li...@wildgooses.com
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, 24 September 2012, 21:55
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] 76Gb to 146Gb
On 24/09/2012 19:07, Ed W wrote:
This is one of those questions which is almost too easy if you are familiar
with
- Original Message -
From: Robert Schetterer rob...@schetterer.org
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, 24 September 2012, 21:06
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] 76Gb to 146Gb
Am 24.09.2012 19:42, schrieb Spyros Tsiolis:
Hello all,
%%%%%%%%
Spyros Tsiolis skrev den 24-09-2012 19:42:
Any help would be appreciated or any ideas you might have.
try google centos cloud server
if you would like to do it local, use all 4 drives with 2 raid1 in the
same controller if possible, then use sysrescue cd to tar it all over to
the other
Spyros Tsiolis skrev den 24-09-2012 20:42:
Having said that, would it be possible to take
away on 72Gb drive (say Drive1 the second drive)
and shove in one of the two 146Gb ones ?
this can be done yes, but you will have to do more steps :)
first step, remove one drive
add the 146 drive
wait
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 21.9.2012, at 8.28, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
doveadm multi [-A | -u wildcards] separator string comand 1
[separator string command 2 [...]]
Thoughts?
As command name I could also think of doveadm sequence, which
implies the commands
On 9/24/2012 1:42 PM, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
Having said that, would it be possible to take
away on 72Gb drive (say Drive1 the second drive)
and shove in one of the two 146Gb ones ?
It's always best to manually take a drive off line before pulling it.
Shouldn't the array be rebuilt ?
On 09/24/2012 01:42 PM, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
Hello all,
I have a DL360 G4 1U server that does a wonderfull job with dovecot horde,
Xmail and OpenLDAP for a company and serving about 40 acouunts.
The machine is wonderful. I am very happy with it.
However, I am running out of disk space.
On 09/24/2012 10:59 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
We've done this on the same hardware. You can pick up these servers for
cheap; just buy an extra one. Take the new machine, throw two big disks
in it, and install Gentoo.
I seem to have gone insane, I thought this was on gentoo-user for some
Am 24.09.2012 21:24, schrieb Spyros Tsiolis:
- Original Message -
From: Robert Schetterer rob...@schetterer.org
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, 24 September 2012, 21:06
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] 76Gb to 146Gb
Am 24.09.2012 19:42, schrieb Spyros Tsiolis:
Hello all,
42 matches
Mail list logo
