Hello everybody,
As explained in the topic, i have troubles with authentication of my users.
First of all, sorry for my poor english...
I'm running dovecot v1.2.15 on a Debian 6 64bits server up to date.
My users database is an Active Directory 2003 (it's important to know that
because Active
On 17.10.2012, at 2.18, Daniel Parthey wrote:
doveadm -c /etc/dovecot-director/dovecot-director.conf -D purge -A
shows the following message in the log when iterating the 49th user:
Oct 17 00:47:17 10.129.3.233 dovecot: doveadm: Error: purge: invalid option
-- 'e'
Oct 17 00:47:17
On 18.10.2012, at 9.03, Levent Dane wrote:
I can't reproduce this. What contents do you have in dovecot-virtual files?
Also doveconf -n output and gdb backtrace would be helpful:
http://dovecot.org/bugreport.html
in Code/dovecot-virtual:
Archive
inthread refs keyword code not
Thanks a lot to everybody
First step I will upgrade to dovecot2.
I will write my experiences.
Running with fsync disabled is like
having sex with a Bangkok prostitute without a condom while juggling
chainsaws while driving drunk at 250kph at night without headlights.
:-)
Gabor
On 19.10.2012, at 10.40, tmihalicek wrote:
I have a strange errors in .err log file, but the postgres seem to be filling
with quota changes, i will also put configs in
Oct 19 09:23:52 mailstore-node-01 dovecot: imap(t...@example.net): Error:
read(/var/run/dovecot/dict) failed: Timeout
On 19.10.2012, at 23.43, E.B. wrote:
I'm having some problems getting LDA to work without
userdb lookups and have a few related questions. This system has all
users in MySQL, each user with unique UID/GID, no local users at all.
Installation is from apt-get.
1) If LDA is invoked
On 21.10.2012, at 4.52, Jeffrey Ross wrote:
However whenever I enable the snarf plugin using the example on the wiki page
my email is not loaded and when I remove my configuration for snarf my email
re-appears. Based upon what I can tell the snarf plugin is either not
loading (but I see
On 18.10.2012, at 11.05, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
I enabled the trash plugin yesterday, adding trash to mail_plugins,
and configuring the plugin setting trash =
/etc/dovecot/dovecot-trash.conf.ext.
But I still see users with lots of files in INBOX.Trash getting
bounced because of quota
On 22.10.2012, at 13.58, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
My question now is there any way to configure authentication so a
mechanism is only use when connections coming from a set of IPs?
local/remote {} blocks were supposed to provide this. They don't currently work
for auth process settings
On 24.10.2012, at 17.46, Alexander Weber wrote:
if address :is to mantis-admin@*
{
fileinto /home/shared/.automail.Bugtracker/;
}
Use mailbox name, not filesystem path:
fileinto shared/automail/Bugtracker;
On 25.10.2012, at 13.03, Loshkovskyi Andrii wrote:
While using the following set of commands, I am having the error as below:
FETCH 7 (X-GM-MSGID)
A15 FETCH 7 (X-GM-MSGID)
A15 BAD Error in IMAP command FETCH: Unknown parameter X-GM-MSGID
Can I somehow disable such errors so that Dovecot
Am 29.10.2012 16:04, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
On 24.10.2012, at 17.46, Alexander Weber wrote:
if address :is to mantis-admin@*
{
fileinto /home/shared/.automail.Bugtracker/;
}
Use mailbox name, not filesystem path:
fileinto shared/automail/Bugtracker;
error: msgid=*: failed to
On 26.10.2012, at 13.24, FABIO FERRARI wrote:
Hi all,
we have a problem about anvil, it seems that when we have a high load the
dovecot stops to work. Sometimes it is sufficient to make a dovecot
reload, but sometimes we have to restart it.
Oct 26 11:13:55 anvil: Error: net_accept()
On 23.10.2012, at 23.51, Marc Perkel wrote:
Just wondering if anyone has done this.
I have a spam filtering service where I am now storing spam for users I
filter for. It's a filter and forward service so I don't control the
recipient's email server.
What I would like to do somehow is
On 26.10.2012, at 14.44, tony.blue.mailingl...@gmx.de wrote:
Oct 25 23:37:13 gustav dovecot: lda: Error: userdb lookup:
connect(/var/run/dovecot/auth-userdb) failed: Permission denied
(euid=501(andy) egid=100(users) missing +w perm:
/var/run/dovecot/auth-userdb, dir owned by 0:0 mode=0755)
On 26.10.2012, at 22.13, James Devine wrote:
I have an ldap server for which each entry includes the email address and
the username portion of the email address for authentication.
Authentication works by username if the username is unique among all the
entries. I need to now add some users
Hello,
I have here a problem with managesieve. With the login about
webmail (roundcube) comes here in the log:
--snip
dovecot: managesieve-login: Fatal: pool_system_realloc(4294967296):
Out of memory
dovecot: managesieve-login: Fatal: master: service(managesieve-login):
child 10157 returned
On 28.10.2012, at 4.46, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
* When are search indexes updated?
When the index is stale.
* Are they updated incrementally?
* If not, why not?
* If so, why would a mailbox's index drift out-of-date, as mine had?
When a sufficient number of messages are added to an IMAP
On 24.10.2012, at 14.28, Milan Holzäpfel wrote:
Oct 24 10:43:23 two dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=..., method=PLAIN,
rip=..., lip=..., mpid=4977, TLS
Oct 24 10:43:23 two dovecot: imap(lis...@mjh.name): Error: mdbox map
.../mdbox/storage/dovecot.map.index corrupted: Unexpectedly lost
On 29.10.2012, at 17.11, Alexander Weber wrote:
fileinto shared/automail/Bugtracker;
error: msgid=*: failed to store into mailbox
'shared/.automail.Bugtracker/': Invalid mailbox name.
shared/automail/Bugtracker isn't the same as shared/.automail.Bugtracker/.
Anyway that specific error
am 29.10.12 16:23 schrieb Jim Knuth j...@jkart.de:
Hello,
I have here a problem with managesieve. With the login about
webmail (roundcube) comes here in the log:
--snip
dovecot: managesieve-login: Fatal: pool_system_realloc(4294967296):
Out of memory
dovecot: managesieve-login: Fatal: master:
On 29.10.2012, at 17.23, Jim Knuth wrote:
I have here a problem with managesieve. With the login about
webmail (roundcube) comes here in the log:
You can always easily reproduce this? Can you get the network traffic logs
between Roundcube and Dovecot and reproduce it by sending those same
Am 29.10.2012 16:34, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
On 29.10.2012, at 17.11, Alexander Weber wrote:
fileinto shared/automail/Bugtracker;
error: msgid=*: failed to store into mailbox 'shared/.automail.Bugtracker/':
Invalid mailbox name.
shared/automail/Bugtracker isn't the same as
Some future Dovecot version will have imap-idle processes where
IDLEing IMAP connections get moved, so the system wouldn't waste so much
memory for all the IDLEing imap processes. A week ago I thought I'd see
how easy it would be to implement this. I got a basic proof of concept
working as a
On 29.10.2012, at 18.53, Timo Sirainen wrote:
The patch is ugly and still missing many things. Anyway I thought I'd
include it here just in case someone was really eager to continue
implementing it. :) I'm not sure when I'll have time for it.
Oh, and of course I forgot one file out of the
Hello,
I have a dovecot system that uses winbind authentication
against Active Directory. I set it up by following the directions in the
wiki. That works great.
When a new user receives an email, the inbox
is created with permissions 600 (rw- --- --) and ownership user:mail ,
even though I
On 10/29, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 18.10.2012, at 9.03, Levent Dane wrote:
I can't reproduce this. What contents do you have in dovecot-virtual files?
Also doveconf -n output and gdb backtrace would be helpful:
http://dovecot.org/bugreport.html
in Code/dovecot-virtual:
Archive
On 29.10.2012, at 20.17, Levent Dane wrote:
On 10/29, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 18.10.2012, at 9.03, Levent Dane wrote:
I can't reproduce this. What contents do you have in dovecot-virtual
files? Also doveconf -n output and gdb backtrace would be helpful:
http://dovecot.org/bugreport.html
Hi.
For mbox,
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/mbox#Dovecot.27s_Metadata lists a
numer of mail headers:
- X-IMAPbase
- X-IMAP
- X-UID
- Status
- X-Status
- X-Keywords
- Content-Length
that are treated specially by dovecot.
It also suggests, that these should be stripped by the LDA (I guess
Currently if user is 1MB under quota and someone tries to deliver mail that is
over 1MB, Dovecot rejects the mail. But smaller mails aren't rejected probably
for days. So user might not even realize that they didn't receive one of the
mails. Also having a user almost over quota is a rather
On 29.10.2012, at 22.31, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
For mbox,
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/mbox#Dovecot.27s_Metadata lists a
numer of mail headers:
- X-IMAPbase
- X-IMAP
- X-UID
- Status
- X-Status
- X-Keywords
- Content-Length
that are treated specially by dovecot.
Hi.
I recently mentioned in several posts, that I'd tended to use mbox
rather than maildir, because you don't loose so much space (due to
always allocating full blocks per maildir file and thus per mail).
I made some tests of my archive, which consists of some 3,4 million
mails at a total of
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/alpha/dovecot-2.2.alpha1.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/alpha/dovecot-2.2.alpha1.tar.gz.sig
I wanted to start stabilizing v2.2 release some months ago already, but
I somehow got stuck adding more and more features. Now it looks like all
of the necessary API
Hi,
no one here who is able to reply to my questions?
Regards
Patrick
Patrick Westenberg schrieb:
Hi everyone,
short version:
Is there no built in failover mechanism for the director service to
handle a backend failure?
Long version:
I have a frontend server running the director service
On 29.10.2012, at 22.54, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
I recently mentioned in several posts, that I'd tended to use mbox
rather than maildir, because you don't loose so much space (due to
always allocating full blocks per maildir file and thus per mail).
..
In the end I probably changed my
Hi Timo.
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 22:40 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I wondered, when using maildir, are there any headers that dovecote
would treat specially, too?
And which I therefore should strip?
No. Maildir metadata is stored elsewhere.
Great... and I expect that this (no headers from
People already replied and pointed to poolmon. There is no built-in failure
handling, because it's not possible to implement it in a way that works well
for everyone. Although I think poolmon could also itself use a bit of tweaking.
For example if all hosts became very heavily loaded, poolmon
On 29.10.2012, at 23.09, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 22:40 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I wondered, when using maildir, are there any headers that dovecote
would treat specially, too?
And which I therefore should strip?
No. Maildir metadata is stored elsewhere.
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 23:06 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
There is of course mdbox also, which gives the best of both mbox and maildir
(and some of its own new annoyances).
Thanks, Timo,... I forgot to mention that.
For me _personally_ two things speak against using it:
a) To be honest, you
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 23:13 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Great... and I expect that this (no headers from the maildir files
are
interpreted) applies also, when one imports mails the first time.
With import I don't mean via IMAP, but plainly moving e.g. a maildir
++
tree under dovecots
On 10/29, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 29.10.2012, at 20.17, Levent Dane wrote:
On 10/29, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 18.10.2012, at 9.03, Levent Dane wrote:
I can't reproduce this. What contents do you have in dovecot-virtual files?
Also doveconf -n output and gdb backtrace would be helpful:
On 29.10.2012, at 23.15, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
btw: What are the actual advantages of sdbox over maildir?
* Not moving files from new/ to cur/ directory
* Not renaming files when changing message flags
* Not readdir()ing directories (although maildir_very_dirty_syncs=yes helps a
am 29.10.12 16:41 schrieb Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi:
On 29.10.2012, at 17.23, Jim Knuth wrote:
I have here a problem with managesieve. With the login about
webmail (roundcube) comes here in the log:
You can always easily reproduce this? Can you get the network traffic logs
between
On 29.10.2012, at 23.43, Jim Knuth wrote:
~# gdb /usr/lib/dovecot/managesieve-login /var/run/dovecot/login/core
/var/run/dovecot/login/core: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden.
You'll of course need to have the core file first. Instead of:
dovecot: managesieve-login: Fatal: master:
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 23:39 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Right. The only special case is X-UIDL: header, which is used for POP3 UIDLs
but only if pop3_reuse_xuidl=yes (which isn't really recommended nowadays as
there are other ways to do it).
Great... I think it would worth adding all this
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 23:42 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
btw: What are the actual advantages of sdbox over maildir?
* Not moving files from new/ to cur/ directory
* Not renaming files when changing message flags
* Not readdir()ing directories (although maildir_very_dirty_syncs=yes helps
am 29.10.12 22:46 schrieb Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi:
On 29.10.2012, at 23.43, Jim Knuth wrote:
~# gdb /usr/lib/dovecot/managesieve-login /var/run/dovecot/login/core
/var/run/dovecot/login/core: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden.
You'll of course need to have the core file first.
On 29.10.2012, at 23.54, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 23:42 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
btw: What are the actual advantages of sdbox over maildir?
* Not moving files from new/ to cur/ directory
* Not renaming files when changing message flags
* Not readdir()ing
On 29.10.2012, at 23.52, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 23:39 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Right. The only special case is X-UIDL: header, which is used for POP3 UIDLs
but only if pop3_reuse_xuidl=yes (which isn't really recommended nowadays as
there are other ways to
On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 00:08 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Great... I think it would worth adding all this to:
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/Maildir
Well, that isn't really maildir-specific. It's pop3 specific that is
done with all mailbox formats. pop3_reuse_xuidl setting's comments
+1
Better to be lenient, than to confuse users by accepting some but not other
messages.
I believe most larger mail providers has a max message size of around 64MB or
less, so allowing the final message to exceed quota by about that sounds
reasonable to me.
-jf
Please have a look at:
http://master.wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/mbox?action=diffrev2=17rev1=16
http://master.wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/Maildir?action=diffrev2=45rev1=44
whether it's correct.
Oh and... I'd assume that everything I've added for maildir also applies
to the dbox formats?
+1 to one last mail, though it would be nice if the over percentage
could be configurable...
--
Computerisms
Bob Miller
867-334-7117 / 867-633-3760
http://computerisms.ca
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 22:39 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Currently if user is 1MB under quota and someone tries to
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
Currently if user is 1MB under quota and someone tries to deliver mail
that is over 1MB, Dovecot rejects the mail. But smaller mails aren't
rejected probably for days. So user might not even realize that they
didn't receive one of the mails. Also having a user
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 22:39 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
So what do you think about v2.2 allowing delivery of one last mail even if it
brings the user over quota?
+1 only if configurable, and with an additional configurable quota
percentage value option for those that do enable the
Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 22:39 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
So what do you think about v2.2 allowing delivery of one last mail even if
it brings the user over quota?
+1 only if configurable, and with an additional configurable quota
percentage value
On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 00:05 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
And I guess the interior of the files is the same? I.e. just the plain
mail without any changes or quoting?
Yes, but it's in dbox format so it contains also some extra metadata (not in
the mail headers).
Yeah of course... but the
Hi again :)
In the meantime I made some checks[0] on how much storage one looses by
using maildir (compared to mbox)... and decided that it's much but I can
live with it.
This of course doesn't solve my problems that I have a possibly a mix of
different mbox subformats, a mix of different mail
Ben Morrow wrote:
Maybe replace /usr/bin/passwd with htpasswd?
Try pam_pwdfile with poppwd or some other poppassd that supports PAM.
That's it! I was trying to remember the name of this PAM module.
and is there another way other than poppassd?
Write your own PHP script -- it couldn't
Hello,
i use dovecot with maildir. The maildir-folder looks like this:
vmail/mail/user1/cur
vmail/mail/user1/.Sent
vmail/mail/user1/.optionalfolder
Procmail should put some definded mails in the optionalfolder
My uses configuration does not do this:
...
60 matches
Mail list logo
