Re: [Dovecot] Quota

2012-11-05 Thread Christian Rößner
Hi, If connecting from the policy service, can I use Dovecot master password to get quota over IMAP? Yes, I think a master user login should work as if the user has logged in. If you store quota in a database, the policy service could query the database. thanks a lot for your

Re: [Dovecot] starting dovecot

2012-11-05 Thread Dave Abrahams
on Sun Nov 04 2012, Daniel Parthey daniel.parthey-AT-informatik.tu-chemnitz.de wrote: Hi Dave, Dave Abrahams wrote: My system never issues the dovecot start command. I do, however, run /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/imap on port 9xxx. I talk to the server through port 9xxx and through the

[Dovecot] Issues with VANISHED CHANGEDSINCE

2012-11-05 Thread Michael J Rubinsky
I've been seeing the following wonky behavior with Dovecot. Currently this is with Dovecot 2.0.19, but I was also seeing it in earlier versions as well, including versions from the 1.x series. Some background, this is from Horde's ActiveSync library, when it is trying to determine what

Re: [Dovecot] Issues with VANISHED CHANGEDSINCE

2012-11-05 Thread Michael M Slusarz
Quoting Michael J Rubinsky mrubi...@horde.org: Also, to verify it wasn't something screwy with my server, Michael Slusarz provided me with this from his server: quote There's definitely something wonky going on in the code. There's a certain tipping point of modseqs where the values

Re: [Dovecot] Issues with VANISHED CHANGEDSINCE

2012-11-05 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 5.11.2012, at 18.13, Michael J Rubinsky wrote: I've been seeing the following wonky behavior with Dovecot. Currently this is with Dovecot 2.0.19, but I was also seeing it in earlier versions as well, including versions from the 1.x series. Some background, this is from Horde's

Re: [Dovecot] Issues with VANISHED CHANGEDSINCE

2012-11-05 Thread Michael J Rubinsky
Quoting Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi: On 5.11.2012, at 18.13, Michael J Rubinsky wrote: I've been seeing the following wonky behavior with Dovecot. Currently this is with Dovecot 2.0.19, but I was also seeing it in earlier versions as well, including versions from the 1.x series. Some

Re: [Dovecot] Issues with VANISHED CHANGEDSINCE

2012-11-05 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 5.11.2012, at 20.37, Michael J Rubinsky wrote: On 5.11.2012, at 18.13, Michael J Rubinsky wrote: I've been seeing the following wonky behavior with Dovecot. Currently this is with Dovecot 2.0.19, but I was also seeing it in earlier versions as well, including versions from the 1.x

[Dovecot] %{ldap:nonExistantAttribut} (was Re: v2.2.alpha1 released)

2012-11-05 Thread Steffen Kaiser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 29 Oct 2012, Timo Sirainen wrote: this syntax is now replaced by an empty string, if the attribute is missing, instead of generating a backtrace as in v2.1. http://wiki2.dovecot.org/AuthDatabase/LDAP/Userdb?highlight=(%25{ldap) is the

Re: [Dovecot] Issues with VANISHED CHANGEDSINCE

2012-11-05 Thread Michael J Rubinsky
Quoting Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi: On 5.11.2012, at 20.37, Michael J Rubinsky wrote: On 5.11.2012, at 18.13, Michael J Rubinsky wrote: I've been seeing the following wonky behavior with Dovecot. Currently this is with Dovecot 2.0.19, but I was also seeing it in earlier versions as well,

Re: [Dovecot] Issues with VANISHED CHANGEDSINCE

2012-11-05 Thread Michael M Slusarz
Quoting Michael J Rubinsky mrubi...@horde.org: I don't think they become incorrect, just that there are more of them than really necessary? Yes, there's a tipping point. It's when the modseq no longer exists in the dovecot.index.log* files, which get rotated once in a while. This shouldn't

Re: [Dovecot] Issues with VANISHED CHANGEDSINCE

2012-11-05 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 12:43 -0700, Michael M Slusarz wrote: My argument is much simpler: it is blatantly breaking the RFC. From RFC 5162 [3.2]: The VANISHED UID FETCH modifier instructs the server to report those messages from the UID set parameter that have been expunged and

Re: [Dovecot] v2.1 memory usage

2012-11-05 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 21:43 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: v2.1's imap/pop3 processes are linked with OpenSSL by default, because of imapc/pop3c storages. I wonder if you notice any actual (system-global) memory usage reduction when compiling without those and you have thousands of imap

Re: [Dovecot] v2.1 memory usage

2012-11-05 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 23:40 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: Anyway, looks like Dovecot can't link OpenSSL to imap/pop3 processes without wasting a ton of memory. In v2.2 I already moved imapc/pop3c backend code to plugins to avoid this. Looks like similar ugliness is needed for other

Re: [Dovecot] Issues with VANISHED CHANGEDSINCE

2012-11-05 Thread Michael J Rubinsky
Quoting Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi: On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 12:43 -0700, Michael M Slusarz wrote: My argument is much simpler: it is blatantly breaking the RFC. From RFC 5162 [3.2]: The VANISHED UID FETCH modifier instructs the server to report those messages from the UID set parameter

[Dovecot] Android ICS stock client and IMAP Capability issue.

2012-11-05 Thread Massimiliano Cianelli
Hi, My setup: Dovecot 2 latest, installed to replace courrier IMAP, and off course configured with the dot separator and all folder under INBOX.*. The problem: My phone was driving me mad during the test, due that it will only recognize Inbox. How found the solution: I've started sniffing

Re: [Dovecot] Android ICS stock client and IMAP Capability issue.

2012-11-05 Thread Ben Morrow
At 6AM +0100 on 6/11/12 you (Massimiliano Cianelli) wrote: Hi, My setup: Dovecot 2 latest, installed to replace courrier IMAP, and off course configured with the dot separator and all folder under INBOX.*. The problem: My phone was driving me mad during the test, due that it will only

Re: [Dovecot] Security precautions for remote clients

2012-11-05 Thread Alessio Cecchi
Il 06/11/2012 00:19, Roman Gelfand ha scritto: Where can I find something like remote client secure dovecot best practices or, perhaps, if there is not many, if you could list major configuration/setup points. Thanks in advance Dovecot configuration is secure by default. For more information

Re: [Dovecot] LMTP benefit vs LDA

2012-11-05 Thread Alessio Cecchi
Il 03/11/2012 13:41, Daniel Parthey ha scritto: Davide wrote: my question is what is benefit implementing LMTP service replacing LDA i have dovecot 2.1.8 with vpoipmail+qmail and about 500 users now i'm using LDA and i'm interested on LMTP service. with LMTP... [...] * you don't need to