+1
On 5/30/13, Edwardo Garcia wdgar...@gmail.com wrote:
As oringanal poster, I agree with previouz comment, I too feel thiz
dovecot responsibile for thiz work handoff, or should delete ability to use
two host, people twitter I ask all along thought this how it work too!
On Wed, May 29,
On 5/30/13, Robert Schetterer r...@sys4.de wrote:
Am 30.05.2013 03:41, schrieb Edwardo Garcia:
As oringanal poster, I agree with previouz comment, I too feel thiz
dovecot responsibile for thiz work handoff, or should delete ability to
use
two host, people twitter I ask all along thought this
I have discovered it. I enabled the namespace inbox and location of
mailbox. it all looks good now.
thanks for your efforts.
-Original Message-
From: Steffen Kaiser
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 9:35 AM
To: MP Netsai
Cc: Dovecot MM
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] imap/pop problem
-BEGIN
Hi,
I read about Snarf plugin, it works if the mail already in spool area, but
I want to know whether it is possible if users quota exceeded then instead
of mail rejected it should delived to user spool area or somewhere else.
Regards,
Arun Gupta
On Wed, 29 May 2013, Arun Gupta wrote:
On 27-05-2013 16:56, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
On 27/5/2013 1:07 μμ, Birta Levente wrote:
I tried to build rpm based on dovecot-2.2.2-2.fc20.src.rpm on Centos 6.4
You may want to try:
dovecot-2.2.2-2.noa.el6.src.rpm
which produces:
dovecot-2.2.2-2.noa.el6.x86_64.rpm
-Original Message-
From: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org [mailto:dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org]
On Behalf Of Burak GÜRER
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:34 AM
To: Nikolaos Milas
Cc: Dovecot Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 2.2 build rpm on Centos6
On 27-05-2013 16:56,
Good morning.
28.05.2013 18:06, Steffen Kaiser пишет:
mail=b...@example2.com,ou=mail,dc=example2,dc=com
Thank you, I lost sight of that.
In my opinion, you try make LDAP more complicate is it is designed as.
I'm tried to create error-robust structure. For example when schema for
mail
On 30/05/2013 10:34, Burak GÜRER wrote:
On 27-05-2013 16:56, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
On 27/5/2013 1:07 μμ, Birta Levente wrote:
I tried to build rpm based on dovecot-2.2.2-2.fc20.src.rpm on Centos 6.4
You may want to try:
dovecot-2.2.2-2.noa.el6.src.rpm
which produces:
On 30-05-2013 10:52, Arto Saraniva wrote:
-Original Message-
From: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org [mailto:dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org]
On Behalf Of Burak GÜRER
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:34 AM
To: Nikolaos Milas
Cc: Dovecot Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 2.2 build rpm on
Am 30.05.2013 05:42, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
Am 30.05.2013 03:41, schrieb Edwardo Garcia:
As oringanal poster, I agree with previouz comment, I too feel thiz
dovecot responsibile for thiz work handoff, or should delete ability to use
two host, people twitter I ask all along thought this
On 20/05/13 23:40, Gedalya wrote:
On 05/20/2013 05:13 PM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 20/05/13 17:12, Gedalya wrote:
On 05/20/2013 12:02 PM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
Exim doesn't seem to have any variable expansion for the From field
If using the From header actually makes sense to you... then
On 2013-05-30 2:59 AM, Nick Edwards nick.z.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
nobody makes us dovecot true, but dovecot works fine and in perfect
harmony with postfix, except this one option. I remember the earlier
thread and have been waiting for this option, but now I see Timo has
decided to drop the
On 2013-05-30 3:26 AM, Arun Gupta ar...@cdac.in wrote:
I read about Snarf plugin, it works if the mail already in spool area,
but I want to know whether it is possible if users quota exceeded then
instead of mail rejected it should delived to user spool area or
somewhere else.
Again, you
Forgive what may be a newby question, but I'm trying to get a new setup
working, and there are many different things confusing me.
I'm trying for a gnus + dovecot + mbsync arrangement, with mbsync
writing to maildirs, and gnus reading from those dirs with a dovecot
invocation. Fairly standard, I
Am 30.05.2013 12:54, schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 30.05.2013 05:42, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
Am 30.05.2013 03:41, schrieb Edwardo Garcia:
As oringanal poster, I agree with previouz comment, I too feel thiz
dovecot responsibile for thiz work handoff, or should delete ability to use
two
On 2013-05-30 9:10 AM, Robert Schetterer r...@sys4.de wrote:
Hi Harald, if you declare this broken, why not fix it yourself, instead
of barking to the moon, however the current behave should be written in
the wiki, to avoid recover the same questions on the list in periods
Well, I'd add that
On Thursday 30 of May 2013 10:33:01 Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
Does anyone have a recommended way of handling this? Is it possible to
either flatten the structure further, or somehow tell dovecot to
recurse into directories? I don't mind having a separate gnus server
for each mail account, but I'd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Arun Gupta wrote:
I read about Snarf plugin, it works if the mail already in spool
area, but I want to know whether it is possible if users quota
exceeded then instead of mail rejected it should delived to user
spool area or somewhere else.
I
I am following the steps listed in:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/ActiveDirectoryNtlm
My goal is to have single sign-on for Microsoft Outlook applications.
I working and I have some doubts since I never set up an imap server, hope
I can help :).
The version that I have installed is devecot
The wiki link you refer to is for dovecot v1.
You are using v2.
Use the correct wiki link...
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/ActiveDirectoryNtlm
Also, you are using an old version of v2 - use the latest 2.1 (2.1.16),
or better yet, the latest 2.2 (2.2.2)...
Charles
On 2013-05-30 11:34
On 28.5.2013, at 13.42, Arun Gupta ar...@cdac.in wrote:
I configured imap quota on dovecot-2.0 with backend Maildir++, after
exceeding user quota the sender receiving bounce mails, Is there any way that
after exceeding user quota the mail will deliver somewhere else like user
spool area?
Sorry!, And try to install the latest version and tell them.
Thanks!
2013/5/30 Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com
The wiki link you refer to is for dovecot v1.
You are using v2.
Use the correct wiki link...
Am 30.05.2013 15:17, schrieb Charles Marcus:
On 2013-05-30 9:10 AM, Robert Schetterer r...@sys4.de wrote:
Hi Harald, if you declare this broken, why not fix it yourself, instead
of barking to the moon, however the current behave should be written in
the wiki, to avoid recover the same
On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 20:24 +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Well, I'd add that the config itself should complain (with a link to the
wiki page explaining the issue) if more than one server is added. In
other words, it should tell the admin that it will not work as they may
be expecting.
On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 07:01 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2013-05-30 2:59 AM, Nick Edwards nick.z.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
nobody makes us dovecot true, but dovecot works fine and in perfect
harmony with postfix, except this one option. I remember the earlier
thread and have been
On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 15:10 +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Hi Harald, if you declare this broken, why not fix it yourself, instead
of barking to the moon, however the current behave should be written in
the wiki, to avoid recover the same questions on the list in periods
Question Robert,
Karol Jurak karol.ju...@gmail.com writes:
On Thursday 30 of May 2013 10:33:01 Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
Does anyone have a recommended way of handling this? Is it possible to
either flatten the structure further, or somehow tell dovecot to
recurse into directories? I don't mind having a separate
27 matches
Mail list logo
