-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 5 Aug 2013, alfdc wrote:
My MTA is sendmail. And for sendmail the suggested way to trigger
spamassasin is via procmail. But since procmail is gone then
see
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/IntegratedInMta
procmail is just one way.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 5 Aug 2013, Bo Lynch wrote:
Having some issues with ldap logins. I am using Centos
5,dovecot-1.0.13-1.el5.rfx and openldap-servers-2.3.43-25.el5_8.1
Trying to get this to work with the SoGo interface. First I converted all
my standard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 6 Aug 2013, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
My MTA is sendmail. And for sendmail the suggested way to trigger
spamassasin is via procmail. But since procmail is gone then
see
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/IntegratedInMta
procmail is just
Hello,
[...]
In higher dovecot versions INBOX seems to be a kind of protected
foldername. dovecot is not offering this folder in folderlist. If i
rename it, the folder is available again.
[...]
Is there an explaination for this behaviour?
The case-insensitive mailbox name INBOX is a
Hello,
For what it's worth, still experiencing these symptoms with 2.2.5.
Thanks,
Simon.
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 15:02 +0100, Simon Fraser wrote:
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 15:09 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 11:28 +0100, Simon Fraser wrote:
I am running dovecot 2.2.2
Le 6 août 2013 à 00:19, Jim Knuth a écrit :
am 05.08.13 22:03 schrieb Timo Sirainen:
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.5.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.5.tar.gz.sig
[...]
thank you. Which Pigeonhole (Sieve) must I use?
Hello Jim,
Unless I'm wrong, the
am 06.08.13 11:35 schrieb Axel Luttgens axelluttg...@swing.be:
Le 6 août 2013 à 00:19, Jim Knuth a écrit :
am 05.08.13 22:03 schrieb Timo Sirainen:
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.5.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.5.tar.gz.sig
[...]
thank you. Which
Hallo experts,
what is the meaning of the sign in config files as in
ssl_key = /etc/pki/tls/private/dovecot.key
^
|
?
--Frank Elsner
On 6.8.2013, at 13.28, Frank Elsner fr...@moltke28.b.shuttle.de wrote:
what is the meaning of the sign in config files as in
ssl_key = /etc/pki/tls/private/dovecot.key
^
|
?
Read the value from the specified file. Works for all settings.
On 1.8.2013, at 17.02, Simon Fraser s...@sanger.ac.uk wrote:
Connect with a mail client, and delete the message - without delayed
expunge. So, for example, mutt (press 'd' then '$' to sync the mailbox),
or Evolution set to immediately delete.
Can you reproduce this by disabling automatic
On 6.8.2013, at 14.30, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
Here's another idea:
Try disabling replicator plugin from only one side, so there's not
possibility of two dsyncs running at the same time. That should be prevented
already by locking though.
The servers have different hostnames,
On Tue, August 6, 2013 2:41 am, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 5 Aug 2013, Bo Lynch wrote:
Having some issues with ldap logins. I am using Centos
5,dovecot-1.0.13-1.el5.rfx and openldap-servers-2.3.43-25.el5_8.1
Trying to get this to work with
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 14:30 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Here's another idea:
Thank you for still looking into this
Try disabling replicator plugin from only one side, so there's not
possibility of two dsyncs running at the same time. That should be prevented
already by locking though.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 6 Aug 2013, Bo Lynch wrote:
passdb pam {
}
passdb ldap {
args = /etc/dovecot-ldap.pass
}
Is it possible to have 2 auth methods? Meaning if user and passwd does not
match in pam then go with ldap?
as far as I know, if PAM returns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Knuth said the following on 06/08/2013 12:11:
Unless I'm wrong, the latest one for Dovecot 2.2:
http://www.rename-it.nl/dovecot/2.2/dovecot-2.2-pigeonhole-0.4.1.tar.gz
Thanx, Axel. But the question was: Is that the right one? ;)
Works
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 5 Aug 2013, John Williams wrote:
Please forgive me if these are silly questions. I am a normal user, not
a system administrator. I am using Dovecot as a kind of IMAP caching
proxy, i.e. reading IMAP mail via Gnus + Dovecot + Offlineimap.
On Tue, August 6, 2013 9:04 am, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 6 Aug 2013, Bo Lynch wrote:
passdb pam {
}
passdb ldap {
args = /etc/dovecot-ldap.pass
}
Is it possible to have 2 auth methods? Meaning if user and passwd does
not
match
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 6 Aug 2013, John Williams wrote:
dovecot-lda -c config-file -d user mailfile
Aha! Piping a message to the process was the step I was not aware of.
does offlineimap provides logs to get to know what mails are newly
arriving to
On 6.8.2013, at 16.11, Bo Lynch bly...@ameliaschools.com wrote:
dovecot: Aug 06 09:08:48 Error: auth(default): ldap(blynch,69.21.103.133):
No password in reply
LDAP isn't returning a password field. Probably because the dn doesn't have
access to that field. Either give it access, or switch to
On 6.8.2013, at 15.59, Simon Fraser s...@sanger.ac.uk wrote:
Try disabling replicator plugin from only one side, so there's not
possibility of two dsyncs running at the same time. That should be prevented
already by locking though.
I disabled the replication on node b, restarted both, and
On 6.8.2013, at 16.42, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 6.8.2013, at 15.59, Simon Fraser s...@sanger.ac.uk wrote:
Try disabling replicator plugin from only one side, so there's not
possibility of two dsyncs running at the same time. That should be
prevented already by locking though.
On 6.8.2013, at 18.58, Simon Fraser s...@sanger.ac.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 16:45 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Weird, I was sure that would have worked. Well, maybe rawlogs would
show something interesting. I should probably add a proper option for
them, but attached a patch to
* Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi 2013.08.06 18:15:
Now the real problem along the road is the submitting server. If that
server does not indicate the message size during handshake the pre-queue
rejection simply can not work.
quota_grace was meant to solve that. You'll allow the user to
Hello,
Would you please help me solve the following case?
My (CentOS) server runs dovecot and allows both POP3 and IMAP service.
Users are virtual users (no home directories), with messages stored in
Maildir directories under /var/spool/mail/vhosts/example.com/username
Some of them use
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 07:38:59PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
The NFS workarounds code is doing some ugly stuff. I thought it would have,
but looking at the code it doesn't seem so. But still easier to debug if you
first see if the problem is with the NFS workarounds or the lib-index code.
On 08/06/2013 06:31 PM Răzvan Sandu wrote:
…
Implementing filesystem quotas is not an option because a. presently,
all virtual users share same UID/GID on the server and b. administrative
reasons (the full quota situation may occur unexpectedly and this is
not tolerable in corporate
On 6.8.2013, at 19.25, Thomas Leuxner t...@leuxner.net wrote:
* Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi 2013.08.06 18:15:
Now the real problem along the road is the submitting server. If that
server does not indicate the message size during handshake the pre-queue
rejection simply can not work.
* Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi 2013.08.06 19:42:
The idea behind quota_grace is that the last mail would be allowed to take
the user somewhat over quota (e.g. up to 109% quota usage). On the next mail
delivery user is already over quota, so the size of the mail is irrelevant
because a mail of
On 6.8.2013, at 20.57, Thomas Leuxner t...@leuxner.net wrote:
* Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi 2013.08.06 19:42:
The idea behind quota_grace is that the last mail would be allowed to take
the user somewhat over quota (e.g. up to 109% quota usage). On the next mail
delivery user is already over
am 06.08.13 15:10 schrieb Luigi Rosa li...@luigirosa.com:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Knuth said the following on 06/08/2013 12:11:
Unless I'm wrong, the latest one for Dovecot 2.2:
http://www.rename-it.nl/dovecot/2.2/dovecot-2.2-pigeonhole-0.4.1.tar.gz
Thanx, Axel.
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 09:27:20PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 6.8.2013, at 20.57, Thomas Leuxner t...@leuxner.net wrote:
* Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi 2013.08.06 19:42:
The idea behind quota_grace is that the last mail would be
allowed to take the user somewhat over quota (e.g. up to
Am 06.08.2013 20:27, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
On 6.8.2013, at 20.57, Thomas Leuxner t...@leuxner.net wrote:
* Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi 2013.08.06 19:42:
The idea behind quota_grace is that the last mail would be allowed to take
the user somewhat over quota (e.g. up to 109% quota usage). On
* /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk 2013.08.06 20:49:
Personally, I'd much rather allow the last overquota mail, even in
cases where the user goes far over the quota. Apparently Thomas
intends to have a solid, inflexible quota.
The point I'm trying to make is mail being queued by Postfix because it
Thomas Leuxner skrev den 2013-08-06 18:25:
* Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi 2013.08.06 18:15:
Now the real problem along the road is the submitting server. If
that server does not
indicate the message size during handshake the pre-queue rejection
simply can not work.
quota_grace was meant to
34 matches
Mail list logo
