-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014, Michael Cramer wrote:
i tried to setup my configuration to use the SETQUOTA command but the only
thing i got is:
3 setquota "User quota" (storage 12345)
3 OK Setquota completed.
but nothing is changed in database.
i modified
On 1/23/14, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2014-01-22 2:37 PM, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
>> All duplicates have no "received from" headers. Seperate lmtp log shows
>> only one delivery.
>
> As when troubleshooting anything like this, FULL logs for an event
> exhibiting the problem is in order.
>
dou
Hello,
looks like a cosmetical problem but I like to mention it though:
doveadm stats top is interactive. To exit I press as usual CTRL+C and get
^Cdoveadm(root): Error: close(-1[doveadm-stats.c:496]) failed: Interrupted
system call
It's dovecot-2.2.10.
Andreas
On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 03:03:25PM -0500, John Morrissey wrote:
> Hi, I'm having some trouble writing an FTS plugin that uses notmuch
> (http://notmuchmail.org/) as the backend.
>
> As a proof of concept, I'm adding a hardcoded UID to the search results in
> the plugin's lookup handler:
>
> seq
hi,
i tried to setup my configuration to use the SETQUOTA command but the
only thing i got is:
3 setquota "User quota" (storage 12345)
3 OK Setquota completed.
but nothing is changed in database.
i modified the password_query and the user_query to return the admin
and userdb_admin field,
On 01/23/2014 07:11 PM, Michael M Slusarz wrote:
> IIRC, No. Kolab uses the mailbox-level METADATA extension instead (RFC
> 5464).
RFC5257 is for message annotations (not folder/mailbox annotations), so
it is a different thing. Kolab does not use it. Anyway there are not
many servers supporting R
Quoting Ed W :
Hi
And FWIW, that RFC is classified as Experimental. Hasn't been a bunch
of momentum behind it, at least in terms of adoption/implementations.
Mailbox metadata seems to be the more interesting development at this
time (RFC 5464).
michael
Yes, I know, but for groupware collab
On 2014-01-23 11:57 AM, Ed W wrote:
I'm very satisfied and have to highly recommend Timo. His prices were
extremely reasonable and he offered service excellent.
...snip...
Please feel encouraged to employ Timo if you use Dovecot!
I will add a hearty 'seconded!' to this endorsement.
Timo he
Hi
And FWIW, that RFC is classified as Experimental. Hasn't been a bunch
of momentum behind it, at least in terms of adoption/implementations.
Mailbox metadata seems to be the more interesting development at this
time (RFC 5464).
michael
Yes, I know, but for groupware collaboration on mails,
Hi
and some other Dovecot mailing list threads but I am not sure how many
users such a setup will handle. I have a concern about the I/O
performance of NFS in the suggested architecture above. One possible
option available to us is to split up the mailboxes over multiple
clusters with subsets
> Now you could filter using header_checks
> (http://www.postfix.org/header_checks.5.html)
> /From: .*@domain1/ FILTER transport1:[1.1.1.1]
Big thanks for idea!
I don't really like it, but I have not found anything better...
I made
10025 inet n - n - - smtpd
On 2014-01-22 2:37 PM, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
All duplicates have no "received from" headers. Seperate lmtp log shows
only one delivery.
As when troubleshooting anything like this, FULL logs for an event
exhibiting the problem is in order.
So, a full transaction log of a delivery that re
12 matches
Mail list logo