Re: Corrupted index cache after migrating from maildir to mdbox

2014-10-13 Thread Tim
all mails are stored on an xfs filesystem and only the local dovecot accesses it. Possible to fix the index.cache files? I havn't found anything suitable in the docs. The doveadm-index commands are only for the fts plugin I think. On 13.10.2014 02:37, Daniel Parthey wrote: Maybe the index is

Re: Dovecot domain quota

2014-10-13 Thread Jiri Bourek
On 13.10.2014 00:08, Gedalya wrote: On 10/12/2014 01:28 PM, Filip Bartmann wrote: After running `doveadm quota recalc -A` I have in my db: --- +---++--+ | domain| bytes | messages | +---++--+ | debian.jd |

Re: Dovecot domain quota

2014-10-13 Thread Gedalya
On 10/13/2014 04:47 AM, Jiri Bourek wrote: As a hack: you can just not run quota recalc ;-) or more realistically, separately track user quotas individually (you really should!), and post recalc immediately update the domain by running something like update domain_quota set bytes=(select

delete/archive old mail

2014-10-13 Thread sottilette
Hi everybody, I store user's mail in the old mbox format. I have many scripts to manage users that works fine with mbox. I use the very old Expire_mail.pl script to delete mail older than NN days for selected users (nightly cron job). Still works fine with my CentOS

Re: delete/archive old mail

2014-10-13 Thread Robert Schetterer
Am 13.10.2014 um 13:42 schrieb sottile...@rfx.it: Hi everybody, I store user's mail in the old mbox format. I have many scripts to manage users that works fine with mbox. I use the very old Expire_mail.pl script to delete mail older than NN days for selected users (nightly cron

Re: Dovecot domain quota

2014-10-13 Thread Jiri Bourek
On 13.10.2014 11:11, Gedalya wrote: On 10/13/2014 04:47 AM, Jiri Bourek wrote: As a hack: you can just not run quota recalc ;-) or more realistically, separately track user quotas individually (you really should!), and post recalc immediately update the domain by running something like update

To dovecot-ee or not to dovecot-ee

2014-10-13 Thread Jens Dueholm Christensen
Hi At the moment I'm running an ageing 2.0.13 install that need to be upgraded and moved to new HW. I was looking around, and saw that dovecot-ee is listed as a free (ie. 0$) product on dovecot.fi. Apart from the need to register an account in order to purchase an -ee license, are there any

Re: To dovecot-ee or not to dovecot-ee

2014-10-13 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 13.10.2014 um 14:30 schrieb Jens Dueholm Christensen: I've got no problems with downloading, building and installing the normal releases and I have no need for object storage, so will the -ee version give me anything else but access to a YUM repo and RPM packages? upstream support

Re: To dovecot-ee or not to dovecot-ee

2014-10-13 Thread deano-dovecot
On 2014-10-13 08:30, Jens Dueholm Christensen wrote: Apart from the need to register an account in order to purchase an -ee license, are there any cavats by switching to the -ee version compared to compiling and running the regular releases? I've got no problems with downloading, building and

Compile dovecot with sieve/managesieve support

2014-10-13 Thread Jorge Bastos
Hi guys, I'd like to have dovecot with sieve support, but can't find any information on how to enable the sieve/managesieve support. Does anyone can light me up on this? Thanks,

Re: Compile dovecot with sieve/managesieve support

2014-10-13 Thread Pascal Volk
On 10/13/2014 07:10 PM, Jorge Bastos wrote: Hi guys, I'd like to have dovecot with sieve support, but can't find any information on how to enable the sieve/managesieve support. Does anyone can light me up on this? http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole should provide all the information

RE: Compile dovecot with sieve/managesieve support

2014-10-13 Thread Jorge Bastos
Larry Pascal, Thanks for the reply. Ok this is the lib for sieve, and the sieved, I see in debian packages that there is a dovecot-managesieved, the daemon, does this pigeonhole is the daemon also? -Original Message- From: Larry Rosenman [mailto:larry...@gmail.com] Sent:

]UG] Dovecot 2.2.9 SSL client cert verification fails: openssl verify: OK

2014-10-13 Thread Daniel Dickinson
Greetings all, I have verified a bug that has long been attributed to lack of knowledge on the part of the user. Dovecot rejects StartSSL client certificates due to reject StartSSL root CA when doing client verification even though the appropriately constructed ca-bundle.pem has been created and

Permissions for shared mail don't work

2014-10-13 Thread Damien Desfontaines
Good morning, I'm using dovecot v.2.1.7 on Debian Sid, and the output of dovecot -n is available here: http://paste.fulltxt.net/C-O I'm trying to make the mailbox of (system) user spam available to user ted. I followed these instructions: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/SharedMailboxes/Permissions

Re: Corrupted index cache after migrating from maildir to mdbox

2014-10-13 Thread Tim Meusel
On 13.10.2014 02:37, Daniel Parthey wrote: Maybe the index is corrupted too and the index.cache is a cached version of the corrupted index? Are you using NFS with mdbox and accessing one nfs mailbox directory concurrently from several dovecot hosts? all mails are stored on an xfs

RE: Compile dovecot with sieve/managesieve support

2014-10-13 Thread Jorge Bastos
I see, If i need anything else i'll post, Thanks, -Original Message- From: Larry Rosenman [mailto:larry...@gmail.com] Sent: segunda-feira, 13 de Outubro de 2014 21:05 To: Jorge Bastos Subject: Re: Compile dovecot with sieve/managesieve support Pigeonhole does ManageSieve as

Mailbox format (was: RE: Compile dovecot with sieve/managesieve support)

2014-10-13 Thread Jorge Bastos
Guys, Whats the best mailbox format: - dbox - mbox - maildir - ?!? Pros and cons? -Original Message- From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos Sent: segunda-feira, 13 de Outubro de 2014 21:35 To: dovecot@dovecot.org Subject: RE: Compile dovecot

Re: Compile dovecot with sieve/managesieve support

2014-10-13 Thread Daniel Parthey
Hi, please have a look at http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole/Installation Kind regards Daniel

Re: Mailbox format

2014-10-13 Thread Gedalya
On 10/13/2014 05:29 PM, Jorge Bastos wrote: Guys, Whats the best mailbox format: - dbox Dovecot-specific. Higher performance, saves I/O. - mbox Don't bother. - maildir Simple, compatible, resilient. - ?!? Pros and cons? No short answer is the right answer. Try to thoroughly read

Re: [Pigeonhole Sieve interpreter] :create argument and lda_mailbox_autosubscribe setting

2014-10-13 Thread Stephan Bosch
On 10/8/2014 2:13 PM, Vivien Lacourba wrote: Hi, I am using dovecot and dovecot-sieve packages from Debian Wheezy (2.1.7-7+deb7u1). I noticed that while using :create (from the mailbox extension) in my Sieve filter and lda_mailbox_autosubscribe = yes in Dovecot's LDA config it