On 11/30/2014 05:53 AM, AMM wrote:
__strspn_sse42 (in /lib64/libc-2.14.90.so)
Is it possible that you are encountering this issue?
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=270925
Either way, the error seems to stem from your libc implementation (if it is not
the valgrind bug).
If possible, upgrade
On Monday 01 December 2014 03:41 PM, Teemu Huovila wrote:
On 11/30/2014 05:53 AM, AMM wrote:
__strspn_sse42 (in /lib64/libc-2.14.90.so)
Is it possible that you are encountering this issue?
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=270925
Either way, the error seems to stem from your libc
Hi,
why I don't see SORT capability on my dovecot server?
# telnet localhost 143
Trying ::1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE
STARTTLS AUTH=PLAIN AUTH=LOGIN AUTH=DIGEST-MD5 AUTH=CRAM-MD5] Dovecot
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:19 schrieb absolutely_f...@libero.it:
why I don't see SORT capability on my dovecot server?
# telnet localhost 143
Trying ::1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE
STARTTLS
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:32 schrieb absolutely_f...@libero.it:
# dovecot -n |grep -i sort
(nothing)
i meant post the complete output
you can't grep for something not existing
but you or some config-include may set something wrong
Maybe to full list is only available after authentication?
Here's my conf:
# dovecot -n
# 2.0.9: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.32-71.el6.x86_64 x86_64 CentOS release 6.6 (Final)
auth_mechanisms = plain login digest-md5 cram-md5
disable_plaintext_auth = no
first_valid_gid = 89
first_valid_uid = 89
mail_gid = 89
mail_location =
On 12/01/2014 12:41 PM, AMM wrote:
On Monday 01 December 2014 03:41 PM, Teemu Huovila wrote:
But Dovecot 2.2.10 (and earlier versions) were not throwing this error.
This test was added in Dovecot version 2.2.14. It is also the only reference to
strspn() in the whole project.
Can I can
On Monday 01 December 2014 05:24 PM, Teemu Huovila wrote:
On 12/01/2014 12:41 PM, AMM wrote:
On Monday 01 December 2014 03:41 PM, Teemu Huovila wrote:
But Dovecot 2.2.10 (and earlier versions) were not throwing this error.
This test was added in Dovecot version 2.2.14. It is also the only
Hi,
Dovecot Director is used to keep a temporary user - Dovecot backend server
mapping. So, Director decides which backend handles each user and the user
is always redirected to the same server. All user data is stored in shared
storage (NFS).
The Dovecot presentation featured during this webinar
Il 01/12/2014 17:24, absolutely_f...@libero.it ha scritto:
Hi,
I'm going to set up a new storage for our email users (about 10k).
It's a network attached storage (Coraid).
In your opinion, what is the best file system for mail server
(pop3/imap/webmail) purpose?
Thank you
Hi,
XFS, if you can
I used XFS (with 20k users) until I switched to a NetApp (and now I'm
really happy).
Yes, I'd say NetApp is pretty good, we are using this type of storage at
work.
Regards
--
CHUNKZ.NET - casual fiddler and computer technician
Bertrand Caplet, Flers (FR)
Feel free to send encrypted/signed
Il 01/12/2014 17:11, rub zorghy ha scritto:
Why Dovecot Director server isn't used to perform this without Dovecot
proxy ? Thus, the load balancer (F5 Big-IP) can distribute requests based
on IMAP protocol to Dovecot Director cluster.
I think that the slide is just one example of a scenario
On 01 Dec 2014, at 18:24, absolutely_f...@libero.it wrote:
Hi,
I'm going to set up a new storage for our email users (about 10k).
It's a network attached storage (Coraid).
In your opinion, what is the best file system for mail server
(pop3/imap/webmail) purpose?
Depends on what OS you
On 12/01/2014 12:56 AM, Teemu Huovila wrote:
Please see http://dovecot.markmail.org/thread/xqu3yr52c6hjxqk2
Thank you. I'll install the patches. Since the Panic is very rare on my
server, I won't really know if they help, but this look like my issue.
--
Mark Sapiro m...@msapiro.netThe
On 2014-12-01 19:56, anon_u...@openmailbox.org wrote:
Il 01/12/2014 17:11, rub zorghy ha scritto:
Why Dovecot Director server isn't used to perform this without Dovecot
proxy ? Thus, the load balancer (F5 Big-IP) can distribute requests
based
on IMAP protocol to Dovecot Director cluster.
I
Quoting absolutely_f...@libero.it:
why I don't see SORT capability on my dovecot server?
# telnet localhost 143
Trying ::1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID
ENABLE IDLE STARTTLS AUTH=PLAIN AUTH=LOGIN
W dniu 2014-12-01 o 18:19, Alessio Cecchi pisze:
Il 01/12/2014 17:24, absolutely_f...@libero.it ha scritto:
Hi,
I'm going to set up a new storage for our email users (about 10k).
It's a network attached storage (Coraid).
In your opinion, what is the best file system for mail server
Am 01.12.2014 um 21:13 schrieb Marcin Mirosław:
W dniu 2014-12-01 o 18:19, Alessio Cecchi pisze:
Il 01/12/2014 17:24, absolutely_f...@libero.it ha scritto:
Hi,
I'm going to set up a new storage for our email users (about 10k).
It's a network attached storage (Coraid).
In your opinion, what
Am 2014-12-01 um 21:16 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 01.12.2014 um 21:13 schrieb Marcin Mirosław:
W dniu 2014-12-01 o 18:19, Alessio Cecchi pisze:
Il 01/12/2014 17:24, absolutely_f...@libero.it ha scritto:
Hi,
I'm going to set up a new storage for our email users (about 10k).
It's a network
Am 01.12.2014 um 17:24 schrieb absolutely_f...@libero.it:
Hi,
I'm going to set up a new storage for our email users (about 10k).
It's a network attached storage (Coraid).
In your opinion, what is the best file system for mail server
(pop3/imap/webmail) purpose?
Thank you
If it is a NAS, as
Hi,
I have an existing (Open)LDAP which I'm using with dovecot and I would
like to implement quotas. I have global quotas working, but I would like
per user quotas similar to what is described in the wiki
(http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Quota/Configuration#LDAP) My problem is that
there is no obvious
Can you use both ssl_protocols *and* ssl_cipher_list in the same config
(in a way that's sane)?
ssl_protocols (= 2.1)
and
ssl_cipher_list
co-exist, or are they mutually exclusive?
I have a Dovecot 2.2.13 system, and I tried setting:
I also tried things like
ssl_cipher_list = HIGH
or
On 12/1/2014 4:43 PM, Will Yardley wrote:
Can you use both ssl_protocols *and* ssl_cipher_list in the same config
(in a way that's sane)?
Is there a way to exclude these ciphers, while still keeping my config
easy to parse and avoiding duplicative or deprecated configs?
Yes to both. If you
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 09:27:48PM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
On 12/1/2014 4:43 PM, Will Yardley wrote:
Can you use both ssl_protocols *and* ssl_cipher_list in the same config
(in a way that's sane)?
Is there a way to exclude these ciphers, while still keeping my config
easy to parse
El 01/12/14 a las 18:45, Sami Ketola escribió:
On 01 Dec 2014, at 18:24, absolutely_f...@libero.it wrote:
Hi,
I'm going to set up a new storage for our email users (about 10k).
It's a network attached storage (Coraid).
In your opinion, what is the best file system for mail server
El 01/12/14 a las 17:24, absolutely_f...@libero.it escribió:
Hi,
I'm going to set up a new storage for our email users (about 10k).
It's a network attached storage (Coraid).
In your opinion, what is the best file system for mail server
(pop3/imap/webmail) purpose?
Thank you
And another
Il 01/12/2014 21:13, Marcin Mirosław ha scritto:
W dniu 2014-12-01 o 18:19, Alessio Cecchi pisze:
Il 01/12/2014 17:24, absolutely_f...@libero.it ha scritto:
Hi,
I'm going to set up a new storage for our email users (about 10k).
It's a network attached storage (Coraid).
In your opinion, what
27 matches
Mail list logo
