Re: Reappearing emails - IMAP trace

On 09 Mar 2016, at 03:57, Ron Cleven wrote: > > A few days back, I sent an overview of this problem, but received no > responses. Since then, I have run dozens of traces to isolate the problem, > difficult because there are timing issues involved. I have finally nailed it

Re: syncing mailboxes with dsync after switchover

> On 16 Mar 2016, at 02:04, Sergey Schwartz > wrote: > > Gentlemen, > > I guess my mistake was to use *-R* option, that works similar to *-1* and > your messages can get lost. > > -R Do a reverse sync. Normally, messages would be pushed from the >

Re: overview zlib efficiency?

On 16/03/2016 9:07 AM, micah wrote: > Andrew McGlashan writes: > >> On 16/03/2016 2:01 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> may be someone has already done that: Do you have a script(?) tool which >>> shows the efficiency of the mail

Re: overview zlib efficiency?

On 15/03/16 22:07, micah wrote: Andrew McGlashan writes: On 16/03/2016 2:01 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote: Hi, may be someone has already done that: Do you have a script(?) tool which shows the efficiency of the mail compression if zlib is

Re: overview zlib efficiency?

Andrew McGlashan writes: > On 16/03/2016 2:01 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote: >> Hi, >> >> may be someone has already done that: Do you have a script(?) tool which >> shows the efficiency of the mail compression if zlib is used? >> >> Something

Re: New dovecot user needs installation help

Jason Pruim pru...@gmail.com 352.234.3175 > On Mar 15, 2016, at 8:21 AM, Steffen Kaiser > wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Tue, 15 Mar 2016, Jason Pruim wrote: >>> On Mar 15, 2016, at 3:22 AM, Steffen Kaiser

Re: New dovecot user needs installation help

This is all it’s showing me in the log: [ec2-user@ip-172-31-22-222 ~]$ sudo tail -f /var/log/maillog Mar 15 20:39:41 ip-172-31-22-222 dovecot: doveadm: Debug: This is Dovecot's debug log (1458074381) Mar 15 20:39:41 ip-172-31-22-222 dovecot: doveadm: This is Dovecot's info log (1458074381) Mar

Re: overview zlib efficiency?

Robert L Mathews wrote: > Also keep in mind that even if it does increase CPU usage, it reduces > disk usage. This is probably an excellent tradeoff for most people, > since most servers are limited by disk throughput/latency more than > CPU power. IOPS are harder to scale

Re: overview zlib efficiency?

Quoting Rick Romero : Quoting Robert L Mathews : On 3/15/16 10:13 AM, Sven Hartge wrote: I don't have a script, but I can provide some numbers. I did a test with a server for about 10.000 users and 2TB worth of mail, converting from Maildir++ to

Re: overview zlib efficiency?

Quoting Robert L Mathews : On 3/15/16 10:13 AM, Sven Hartge wrote: I don't have a script, but I can provide some numbers. I did a test with a server for about 10.000 users and 2TB worth of mail, converting from Maildir++ to mdbox with zlib (level = 6) and had a final

Re: overview zlib efficiency?

On 3/15/16 10:13 AM, Sven Hartge wrote: > I don't have a script, but I can provide some numbers. I did a test with > a server for about 10.000 users and 2TB worth of mail, converting from > Maildir++ to mdbox with zlib (level = 6) and had a final size of 1TB, so > 2:1 reduction. These numbers

Re: overview zlib efficiency?

On 16/03/2016 2:01 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote: > Hi, > > may be someone has already done that: Do you have a script(?) tool which > shows the efficiency of the mail compression if zlib is used? > > Something that shows the uncompressed size vrs. the compressed. Remember one

Re: overview zlib efficiency?

Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote: > may be someone has already done that: Do you have a script(?) tool > which shows the efficiency of the mail compression if zlib is used? > Something that shows the uncompressed size vrs. the compressed. I don't have a

Re: overview zlib efficiency?

Em 15/03/16 12:01, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator escreveu: Hi, may be someone has already done that: Do you have a script(?) tool which shows the efficiency of the mail compression if zlib is used? Something that shows the uncompressed size vrs. the compressed. While i dont have the

overview zlib efficiency?

Hi, may be someone has already done that: Do you have a script(?) tool which shows the efficiency of the mail compression if zlib is used? Something that shows the uncompressed size vrs. the compressed. Thanks for hints! /Götz smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: dovecot wiki...

On 16/03/2016 12:09 AM, bOnK wrote: > On 15-3-2016 14:05, Andrew McGlashan wrote: >> How can I stop this if it is normal dovecot wiki > > Turn of JavaScript. Thanks, I use policeman to control what web pages can do, scripts turned off. Gave up on noscript a good while ago, for various

Re: dovecot wiki...

On 15-3-2016 14:05, Andrew McGlashan wrote: Hi, Just want to know if this is a problem at my end (in my browser), or if it is something else. When I copy text from the wiki, the page changes to an edit one; that is very, very annoying. How can I stop this if it is normal dovecot wiki

Re: dovecot wiki...

On 15-3-2016 14:05, Andrew McGlashan wrote: How can I stop this if it is normal dovecot wiki Turn of JavaScript. -- bOnK

dovecot wiki...

Hi, Just want to know if this is a problem at my end (in my browser), or if it is something else. When I copy text from the wiki, the page changes to an edit one; that is very, very annoying. How can I stop this if it is normal dovecot wiki behaviour and what do you think I might look at in my

Re: New dovecot user needs installation help

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 15 Mar 2016, Jason Pruim wrote: On Mar 15, 2016, at 3:22 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Jason Pruim wrote: So I just setup my first dovecot

Re: lmtp timeout, locks and crashes

On 2016-03-15 11:29, Aki Tuomi wrote: On 15.03.2016 12:28, Tom Sommer wrote: On 2016-03-15 10:53, Tom Sommer wrote: I'm seeing some problems on accounts which get a lot of spam (like, a lot). I get these errors: When I do a process-list I see a lot of stuck lmtp processes on the same

Re: New dovecot user needs installation help

Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 15, 2016, at 3:22 AM, Steffen Kaiser > wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > >> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Jason Pruim wrote: >> >> So I just setup my first dovecot install with postfix running for the mail >>

Re: lmtp timeout, locks and crashes

On 15.03.2016 12:29, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > > On 15.03.2016 12:28, Tom Sommer wrote: >> >> On 2016-03-15 10:53, Tom Sommer wrote: >>> I'm seeing some problems on accounts which get a lot of spam (like, a lot). >>> >>> I get these errors: >> >> When I do a process-list I see a lot of stuck lmtp

Re: lmtp timeout, locks and crashes

On 15.03.2016 12:28, Tom Sommer wrote: On 2016-03-15 10:53, Tom Sommer wrote: I'm seeing some problems on accounts which get a lot of spam (like, a lot). I get these errors: When I do a process-list I see a lot of stuck lmtp processes on the same account: 16180 ?D 0:00

Re: lmtp timeout, locks and crashes

On 2016-03-15 10:53, Tom Sommer wrote: I'm seeing some problems on accounts which get a lot of spam (like, a lot). I get these errors: When I do a process-list I see a lot of stuck lmtp processes on the same account: 16180 ?D 0:00 \_ dovecot/lmtp [DATA 172.17.165.14

dsync and ProxyAUTH

Hi, can i use dync to migrate a mailboxes through PROX-AUTH? Could It be an attractive feature for you? Thanks

Re: lmtp timeout, locks and crashes

On 15.03.2016 11:53, Tom Sommer wrote: I'm seeing some problems on accounts which get a lot of spam (like, a lot). I get these errors: Mar 15 10:43:49 lmtp(12390): Error: Timeout (29s) while waiting for lock for transaction log file /var/spool/mail/dovecot///dovecot.list.index.log

lmtp timeout, locks and crashes

I'm seeing some problems on accounts which get a lot of spam (like, a lot). I get these errors: Mar 15 10:43:49 lmtp(12390): Error: Timeout (29s) while waiting for lock for transaction log file /var/spool/mail/dovecot///dovecot.list.index.log (WRITE lock held by pid 12193) ---

Re: New dovecot user needs installation help

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Jason Pruim wrote: So I just setup my first dovecot install with postfix running for the mail server… I can telnet into my dovecot install and login just fine what does "telnet into my dovecot install" mean exacly? Did