On 07/11/2016 00:35, Quaquaraquà wrote:
To have this system to work, I wish some special rule that rewrites the
domain from domain_old to domain_new. But I'm not sure whether this
needs to be done in exim or dovecot and how to add it?
Use a redirect router in exim, see:
http://www.exim.org/ex
On Friday 11 of November 2016, KSB wrote:
> >>> Great! Seems to be working fine for my usage and makes my configs 50%
> >>> smaller (which is gigantic improvement). Will do more testing though.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
>
> A little bit offtopic, but what is the point of using imap/pop SNI?
> All
> cl
> On Nov 11, 2016, at 1:29 PM, KSB wrote:
>
Great! Seems to be working fine for my usage and makes my configs 50%
smaller (which is gigantic improvement). Will do more testing though.
Thanks!
>
> A little bit offtopic, but what is the point of using imap/pop SNI
Great! Seems to be working fine for my usage and makes my configs 50%
smaller (which is gigantic improvement). Will do more testing though.
Thanks!
A little bit offtopic, but what is the point of using imap/pop SNI? All
clients want to connect to their own domain or what?
--
Kaspars
On Friday 11 of November 2016, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> On 11.11.2016 19:17, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
> > On Friday 11 of November 2016, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> >> If you are interested in testing, please find patch attached that allows
> >> you to specify
> >>
> >> local_name *.foo.bar {
> >> }
> >>
> >
On 11.11.2016 19:17, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
On Friday 11 of November 2016, Aki Tuomi wrote:
If you are interested in testing, please find patch attached that allows
you to specify
local_name *.foo.bar {
}
or
local_name *.*.foo.bar {
}
so basically you can now use certificate name mat
This one is for vmail which is attached.
Bill
On 11/10/2016 8:29 PM, Ben Johnson wrote:
On 11/10/2016 3:46 AM, Bill Shirley wrote:
I don't use the Anti-Spam plugin; I just fire off a BASH script every
four hours with
crontab which iterates thru the vmail email accounts and trains
Spamassassin
On Friday 11 of November 2016, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> If you are interested in testing, please find patch attached that allows
> you to specify
>
> local_name *.foo.bar {
> }
>
> or
>
> local_name *.*.foo.bar {
> }
>
> so basically you can now use certificate name matching rules for
> local_name.
On 11.11.2016 12:22, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
On Friday 11 of November 2016, Felipe Gasper wrote:
Hello,
We’re rolling out large SNI deployments for our mail servers. Each
domain
gets an entry like this in the config:
local_name mail.foo.com {
ssl_cert =
Lack of glob/regexp
Hello everyone,
I would like pointers on how to analyze the following situation, please:
I'm running one test and one production dovecot IMAPS server for one of
our platforms. The clients are essentially appliances we distribute,
auth by client cert, virtual users only, mailboxes in maildir forma
> On Nov 11, 2016, at 5:36 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> We are going to do some changes at some point how the certs are loaded and
> handled to alleviate this. The idea is not yet ripe, so I won't go into too
> much detail, but idea is to move the cert storage from protocol login
> proce
> On November 11, 2016 at 12:22 PM Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
>
>
> On Friday 11 of November 2016, Felipe Gasper wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > We’re rolling out large SNI deployments for our mail servers. Each
> > domain
> > gets an entry like this in the config:
> >
> > local_name mail.foo
On Friday 11 of November 2016, Felipe Gasper wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We’re rolling out large SNI deployments for our mail servers. Each
> domain
> gets an entry like this in the config:
>
> local_name mail.foo.com {
> ssl_cert = ssl_key = }
Lack of glob/regexp support here is also a
> On 10 Nov 2016, at 19.11, deoren wrote:
>
>
> I'm running 2.2.25.5 now and when I looked at the announcement forum[1] I see
> a posting[2] for 2.2.26.1, but nothing about repo changes.
>
> For what it is worth, I use the EE credentials on only a single node so I am
> hopefully not triggeri
Hi,
I'm new to dovecot but as I see in mailinglist archive this issue is old
and I didn't find this in archive.
One of cuplrits (I believe not the only possible) is spamassassin. It's
added headers make exactly the difference between S value and filesize.
Probably it's in the way emails are pr
15 matches
Mail list logo
