Re: v2.2.28: patches (to use libressl 2.4.5) and test error (strftime)

2017-02-25 Thread Aki Tuomi
Silly thunderbird, does not understand that "reply to sender" should reply to sender... Aki On 2017-02-25 23:40, Aki Tuomi wrote: tästä jäi pätsi =) Aki On 2017-02-25 22:08, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 25 Feb 2017, at 21.54, Timo Sirainen wrote: Oh, I forgot to remove the #if

Re: v2.2.28: patches (to use libressl 2.4.5) and test error (strftime)

2017-02-25 Thread Aki Tuomi
tästä jäi pätsi =) Aki On 2017-02-25 22:08, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 25 Feb 2017, at 21.54, Timo Sirainen wrote: Oh, I forgot to remove the #if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER checks from lib-dcrypt. Will be removed in v2.2.29. Attached the planned patch that should do it. Well that

Re: v2.2.28: patches (to use libressl 2.4.5) and test error (strftime)

2017-02-25 Thread Timo Sirainen
openssl.diff Description: Binary data

Re: v2.2.28: patches (to use libressl 2.4.5) and test error (strftime)

2017-02-25 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 25 Feb 2017, at 21.11, Ruga wrote: > > t_strftime and variants now .. : ok > > > test-time-util.c:123: Assert failed: strcmp(t_strftime(RFC2822_FMT, > gmtime()), exp) == 0 > > > test-time-util.c:124: Assert failed:

v2.2.28: patches (to use libressl 2.4.5) and test error (strftime)

2017-02-25 Thread Ruga
t_strftime and variants now .. : ok test-time-util.c:123: Assert failed: strcmp(t_strftime(RFC2822_FMT, gmtime()), exp) == 0 test-time-util.c:124: Assert failed: strcmp(t_strfgmtime(RFC2822_FMT, ts), exp) == 0 t_strftime and variants fixed timestamp

Re: sieve_imapsieve centos 7

2017-02-25 Thread Matthew Broadhead
thanks for the help everyone. i reverted to the old antispam plugin as a package from https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/cottsay/dovecot-antispam/ plus this to help configure http://www.iredmail.org/forum/topic8169-iredmail-support-antispam-via-dovecot-and-spamassassin.html On

Re: Director+NFS Experiences

2017-02-25 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 25 Feb 2017, at 17.52, Tanstaafl wrote: > > On Fri Feb 24 2017 14:41:17 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Francisco > Wagner C. Freire wrote: >> In our experience. A ring with more of 4 servers is bad, we have sync >> problems everyone. Using 4

Re: sieve_imapsieve centos 7

2017-02-25 Thread Ben
On 25/02/2017 11:46, Aki Tuomi wrote: imapsieve needs much newer dovecot and sieve. In which case the OP would probably need to install from source, because that's the version in the CentOS 7 repo.

Re: Director+NFS Experiences

2017-02-25 Thread Tanstaafl
On Fri Feb 24 2017 14:41:17 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Francisco Wagner C. Freire wrote: > In our experience. A ring with more of 4 servers is bad, we have sync > problems everyone. Using 4 or less works perfect. Since this contradicts Timo's recommendation not to use

Re: sieve file backend: invalid option `active=~/.dovecot.sieve'

2017-02-25 Thread Stephan Bosch
Op 2/14/2017 om 8:45 PM schreef Ben: > > > On 14/02/2017 14:44, Stephan Bosch wrote: >> >> >> Op 13-2-2017 om 18:15 schreef Ben: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am seeing the followin error in my logs (doveconf -n at the bottom >>> of this mail): >>> >>> Feb 13 16:59:59 mxf dovecot: lmtp(45560,

Re: sieve_imapsieve centos 7

2017-02-25 Thread Aki Tuomi
imapsieve needs much newer dovecot and sieve. ---Aki TuomiDovecot oy Original message From: Ben Date: 25/02/2017 12:33 (GMT+02:00) To: dovecot@dovecot.org Subject: Re: sieve_imapsieve centos 7 >> i am using CentOS 7

Re: sieve_imapsieve centos 7

2017-02-25 Thread Ben
i am using CentOS 7 centos-release-7-3.1611.el7.centos.x86_64 with dovecot dovecot-2.2.10-7.el7.x86_64. i am trying to set up AntiSpam with IMAPSieve but the package seems to be lacking sieve_imapsieve. is there anything i can do? i am not really interested in compiling from source because i