Re: Host ... is being updated before previous update had finished

It's usually very troublesome to try to reproduce and debug these.. It looks like the directors got into some kind of a broken state that wouldn't fix itself. Some host update going around and around in the director ring without being detected as a duplicate/obsolete update. For now I think the

Re: System load spike on dovecot reload

Hi, enabling 'login_proxy_max_disconnect_delay' on IMAP proxy did the trick. I should have mentioned I use proxy servers, sorry Thanks, Dave Dne 22.4.2017 v 06:25 Christian Balzer napsal(a): Hello, On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:43:47 +0200 d...@evilcigi.eu wrote: Hi everyone, I'm running

Re: IMAP hibernate and scalability in general

On 24 Apr 2017, at 4.04, Christian Balzer wrote: > > > Hello, > > Just to follow up on this, we've hit over 16k (default client limit here) > hibernated sessions: > --- > dovecot 119157 0.1 0.0 63404 56140 ?SApr01 62:05 > dovecot/imap-hibernate [11291

Re: Feature Request - Director Balance

Shrinking director_user_expire might be a workaround but not as good as a solution, as also the user can end up mapped to the same server again. Director flush is both manual and aggressive, so not a good solution too. The possibility to move users between backends without killing existing

Re: V1 Dovecot POP3 index migrate to V3

Hello, On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 14:48:01 +0300 Umut Arus wrote: > Hi, > > I've very old Dovecot version so I'm trying to migrate new disk and current > version of dovecot. But POP3 accounts have "version 1" > .INBOX/dovecot-uidlist files so clients download the messages again. > > How can achieve

V1 Dovecot POP3 index migrate to V3

Hi, I've very old Dovecot version so I'm trying to migrate new disk and current version of dovecot. But POP3 accounts have "version 1" .INBOX/dovecot-uidlist files so clients download the messages again. How can achieve not to download to mailbox after copy to new disk? Is there any script or

Re: Dovecot 2.3 ?

Whoops. I meant from -git. Reuben On 24/04/2017 7:54 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: On 24.04.2017 12:30, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: * Reuben Farrelly : Hi, Is anyone here running dovecot-2.3 from hg? I'm using the daily builds on a low traffic machine. It's proxying

Re: Dovecot 2.3 ?

* Aki Tuomi : > > I'm using the daily builds on a low traffic machine. It's proxying > > traffic to a Exchange IMAP server. > > > > Please do not run it from hg, as we no longer provide hg repository. What I meant to say: I use the daily builds. Fair enough :) -- Ralf

Re: Dovecot 2.3 ?

On 24.04.2017 12:30, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * Reuben Farrelly : >> Hi, >> >> Is anyone here running dovecot-2.3 from hg? > I'm using the daily builds on a low traffic machine. It's proxying > traffic to a Exchange IMAP server. > Please do not run it from hg, as we no

Re: Public Folder Problems

No volunteers? Maybe no one understands the cpanel dovecot setup. I certainly don't! atb On 10/04/2017 14:08 +0700, Kevin wrote: Hi, I've been trying to get a Public Folder namespace working, so far without any luck. I've tried in my home folder, outside my home folder, with and without

Re: Dovecot 2.3 ?

* Reuben Farrelly : > Hi, > > Is anyone here running dovecot-2.3 from hg? I'm using the daily builds on a low traffic machine. It's proxying traffic to a Exchange IMAP server. -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charité -

Dovecot 2.3 ?

Hi, Is anyone here running dovecot-2.3 from hg? I'm just interested in finding out how people are going with it, how stable is it and are there any interesting features that make it worth spending time looking at. I'm in a position where I can test with semi-live data (backed up and

Re: Issue with POP3s TLS/SSL on port 995 on Outlook 2016

Aki Tuomi skrev den 2017-04-24 10:42: We consider 2.2.28 stable release. Timo reported one bug in 2.2.28, so not so stable Do you only consider bug-free software as stable? dovecot still works for me, version 2.2.29 i know nothing more

Re: Issue with POP3s TLS/SSL on port 995 on Outlook 2016

On 24.04.2017 11:05, Benny Pedersen wrote: > Aki Tuomi skrev den 2017-04-24 09:16: > >> We consider 2.2.28 stable release. > > Timo reported one bug in 2.2.28, so not so stable Do you only consider bug-free software as stable? Aki

Re: Issue with POP3s TLS/SSL on port 995 on Outlook 2016

Aki Tuomi skrev den 2017-04-24 09:16: We consider 2.2.28 stable release. Timo reported one bug in 2.2.28, so not so stable

Re: Issue with POP3s TLS/SSL on port 995 on Outlook 2016

On 21.04.2017 12:29, Bhushan Bhosale wrote: > Dear Team, > > I'm facing issue with POP3s TLS/SSL on port 995 only for outlook2016. It's > working fine with dovecot v2.2.28 on test environment. > Is the dovecot v2.2.28 is stable released? I can upgrade the version from > v2.1.17 to v2.2.28 on

Re: [BUG] client state / Message count mismatch with imap-hibernate and mixed POP3/IMAP access

On 24.04.2017 04:05, Christian Balzer wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 20:04:38 +0900 Christian Balzer wrote: > >> Hello Aki, Timo, >> >> according to git this fix should be in 2.2.27, which I'm running, so I >> guess this isn't it or something else is missing. >> See: >>