Re: Dovecot >=2.2.29 + Filesystem quota = incorrect storage information

On Tuesday 17 of October 2017, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 17 Oct 2017, at 18.02, Macka wrote: > > I have to resume the thread. > > > > Apparently the problem is caused by the new /usr/include/sys/quota.h file > > (glibc-2.25 and newer) > > > > When I use the quota.h with

dovecot-2.3 (-git) Warning and Fatal Compile Error

I haven't been tracking dovecot-2.3 until now, but I've just given it a quick run, and there are a few things that may need some attention. Linux x86-64, Gentoo, GCC-7.2.0 Dovecot 2.3 @ commit 32c2612514a404ebc226f32bb88f28d76ceb1db1 Compiled with: ./configure --prefix=/usr

Re: Limit the nuumber of mails POPped at a time

I have a piece of software with a mailclient that has problems when it POP's large amounts of mail. Unfortunately the system can't be updated or fixed.So I'm trying to figure out if I can limit the number of mails that can be seen via Dovecot. ... So it would be a question of always presenting

mdbox + director + nfs

Hi Matt We've been running this configuration for the past couple of years. Not noticed any locking issues. As I understand it that's the objective of using Director. As Aki notes make sure you have the appropriate NFS settings. Other lessons we encountered. Important to ensure NFS is NTP

Re: Dovecot >=2.2.29 + Filesystem quota = incorrect storage information

On 17 Oct 2017, at 18.02, Macka wrote: > > I have to resume the thread. > > Apparently the problem is caused by the new /usr/include/sys/quota.h file > (glibc-2.25 and newer) > > When I use the quota.h with glibc-headers-2.25, the filesystem quota limits > are badly

Last Login example

Howdy, Where can i find a configuration example for the last login plugin, that fits for latest dovecot version? Thanks in advanced! Jorge,

Re: Dovecot >=2.2.29 + Filesystem quota = incorrect storage information

W dniu 21.06.2017 o 17:46, Macka pisze: W dniu 20.06.2017 o 21:25, Timo Sirainen pisze: On 20 Jun 2017, at 15.49, Macka wrote: Hi, I have problem with quota storage information in dovecot-2.2.29 (and newer versions, too - 2.2.30.2). I use FS quota backend. . After upgrade

Re: Dovecot 2.2.31 Incorrect Search

My understanding is that the only FTS search provider that supports substrings is the legacy fts-squat. All the others perform only full tokenized search. I think it's possible to configure multiple fts providers, so they can "cascade". But my installation is small enough that I only use

Replication between different versions of dovecot

Hi, Can't find any notes about this in documentation. Is replication supposed to work between different versions of dovecot? I've just found that dovecot 2.2.33.1 was uploaded to debian unstable and it crashes on every replication with older dovecot 2.2.27. (version 2.2.32.1 was probably ok)

Re: Dovecot 2.2.31 Incorrect Search

Hi. I found that the problem emerges when the dovecot uses fts-solr plugin. without it this problem does not emerge. No one has any ideas? 2017-10-12 18:39 GMT+02:00 Siarhei Chystsiakou : > > Hi. > I have installed dovecot 2.2.31 and fts plugin with Apache Solr 6.6.1. > I

Re: Disable PAM

Yep. Just remove any passdb/userdb pam blocks ---Aki TuomiDovecot oy Original message From: Travis Dolan Date: 17/10/2017 17:40 (GMT+02:00) To: dovecot@dovecot.org Subject: Disable PAM Can I disable PAM auth if all my username/password lookups are

Disable PAM

Can I disable PAM auth if all my username/password lookups are via a database connection? I would love to get rid of the following lines in my logs... Oct 17 14:32:14 auth-worker(7809): Info: pam(xxx-xxx-xxx,111.111.111.111,): pam_authenticate() failed: Authentication failure (password

Limit the nuumber of mails POPped at a time

Hi All I'm completely new to the world of Dovecot, so please bear with me if this is a simple noob question (which I fer it is :-) ) I have a postfix/dovecot setup for handling specific mails for clients. I have a piece of software with a mailclient that has problems when it POP's large amounts

Re: Fast replication

On 2017-10-17 01:53, Aki Tuomi wrote: On 16.10.2017 20:34, @4OS wrote: Hi, I'm trying to get replication to work with a 2 machines setup. So far full replication is happening at the specified interval (24hrs) without problem but fast sync is not happening. The fast sync counter is always

Re: mdbox + director + nfs

I am currently in the process of setting up and testing a cluster of 2 Director proxy instances "directing" 143/110 to a cluster of 2 Dovecot "backend" instances using EFS for their data storage. Let me know if you want to chat more about this. Cheers. On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:32 PM Matt