RE: Out of memory on lmtp vsz_limit

2018-02-27 Thread Terence Lau
Looks like its working. Haven't had any recurrence of the issue since scheduling a move operation daily. Thanks for your help. Cheers. From: Aki Tuomi [mailto:aki.tu...@dovecot.fi] Sent: Friday, 16 February 2018 3:17 PM To: Terence Lau ; dovecot@dovecot.org Subject:

Re: use IMAP and POP3 simultaneously (single inbox)

2018-02-27 Thread Robert Schetterer
Am 28.02.2018 um 01:17 schrieb Stanislaw Findeisen: > Hi > > Is it safe to use IMAP and POP3 simultaneously to access the same inbox > (using Maildir structure)? > > Thanks! > Stanisław > It works as designed, you may use virtual plugin with it , too Best Regards MfG Robert Schetterer --

Re: Using virtual folders with younger and index files

2018-02-27 Thread David Mehler
Hello Rob, Do you by chance have a virtual/All folder which holds all your messages? If so, could I see that configuration? Thanks. Dave. On 2/27/18, Rob Hoelz wrote: > Hi list, > > I just encountered a problem while using dovecot's Virtual plugin with > 2.3.0. I

Using virtual folders with younger and index files

2018-02-27 Thread Rob Hoelz
Hi list, I just encountered a problem while using dovecot's Virtual plugin with 2.3.0. I managed to solve the issue, but I wanted to bring it to the attention of others on the list to see if there exists a better solution, if I found a bug, or if it's just a matter of updating documentation.

use IMAP and POP3 simultaneously (single inbox)

2018-02-27 Thread Stanislaw Findeisen
Hi Is it safe to use IMAP and POP3 simultaneously to access the same inbox (using Maildir structure)? Thanks! Stanisław signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

extra IMAP folders: how to make all clients use the same Sent folder?

2018-02-27 Thread Stanislaw Findeisen
Dear All I have just setup IMAP with Maildir, but unfortunately some clients create their own folders instead of using those specified in 15-mailboxes.conf . What could be the reason? Here's what it looks like: > B list "" * > * LIST (\HasNoChildren \Sent) "." "Sent Messages" > * LIST

Re: dovecot.index.pvt reset, view is now inconsistent

2018-02-27 Thread Aki Tuomi
> On 27 February 2018 at 20:02 Rupert Gallagher wrote: > > > Problem solved by going in manually. The log message appears for empty > "public" folders. Say, you have a folder X with subfolder Y, where X does not > contain any e-mail. The log message disappears if you

dovecot.index.pvt reset, view is now inconsistent

2018-02-27 Thread Rupert Gallagher
Problem solved by going in manually. The log message appears for empty "public" folders. Say, you have a folder X with subfolder Y, where X does not contain any e-mail. The log message disappears if you drop an email into X, then remove it. Puf, gone! So, there seems to be a baby bug in how

Re: Quota status to postfix in distributed environment

2018-02-27 Thread Karol Augustin
On 2018-02-27 15:26, LuKreme wrote: > Out of curiosity would it be possible to configure dovecot in such a > way that if a message had been accepted by postfix because it couldn't > check quota the message was delivered anyway, despite being over > quota? There is quota grace parameter, but it

Re: Quota status to postfix in distributed environment

2018-02-27 Thread LuKreme
Out of curiosity would it be possible to configure dovecot in such a way that if a message had been accepted by postfix because it couldn't check quota the message was delivered anyway, despite being over quota? I'd much rather that then risk backscatter. (I used to have quotas, but with the

Re: Quota status to postfix in distributed environment

2018-02-27 Thread Karol Augustin
On 2018-02-26 16:28, SAAHIL IFTEKHAR wrote: > Hi > > I have implemented Quota status to postfix in our setup. I have an imap > server (dovecot) and mail server (postfix) in every node. I am able to send > quota status to postfix and mails are rejected after 100% mail quota is > crossed. This

Re: Quota status to postfix in distributed environment (@lbutlr)

2018-02-27 Thread SAAHIL IFTEKHAR
Hi Actually, the requirement is such that we have to work with this version only. I want to point out that the reason from the problem can be found out from logs(the end section). The "check_policy_service" in main.cf of postfix is the problem according to me. This configuration as a part of